Nondismembered pyeloplasty in a pediatric population: Results of 34 open and laparoscopic procedures

Urology

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 891-894

  Polok, Marcin ^a   Chrzan, Rafal ^b   Veenboer, Paul ^b   Beyerlein, Stefan ^b   Dik, Pieter ^b   Klijn, Aart ^b   Kuijper, Caroline ^b   De Jong, Tom ^b  

^a WROCLAW MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL TENDERNESS; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILDHOOD DISEASE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEVER; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ILEUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NONDISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEROPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELONEPHRITIS; PYELOPLASTY; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEX RATIO; SURGEON; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; URETER; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; UROLOGY;

EID: 80053895451     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.039     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. B.J. Tan, and A.D. Smith Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what? Curr Opin Urol 14 2004 55 59
2. N. Arun, N.S. Kekre, and V. Nath Is open pyeloplasty still justified? Br J Urol 80 1997 379 381
3. D. Dindo, N. Demartines, and C. Pa Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 2004 205 213
4. P.H. O'Reilly, P.J. Brooman, and S. Mark The long therm results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty BJU Int 87 2001 287 289
5. S.A. Seixas-Mikelus, L.C. Jenkins, and P. Williot Pediatric pyeloplasty: comparison of literature meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open techniques with open surgery at a single institution J Urol 182 2009 2428 2434
6. J.C. Sheu, C.C. Koh, and P.Y. Chang Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: 10 years' experience in one institution Pediatr Surg Int 22 2006 519 523
7. T.W. Hensle The correction of ureteropelvic juntion obstruction F.F. Marshall, Operative Urology 1991 WB Saunders Philadelphia 469 476
8. W.W. Schuessler, M.T. Grune, and L.V. Tecuanhuey Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty J Urol 150 1993 1795 1799
9. L.R. Kavousi, and C.A. Peters Laparoscopic pyeloplasty J Urol 150 1993 1891 1894
10. I.R. Ravish, R.B. Nerli, and M.R. Reddy Laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with open pyeloplasty in children J Endourol 21 2006 897 902
11. A. Srivastava, P. Singh, and R. Maheshwari Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a versatile alternative to open pyeloplasty Urol Int 83 2009 420 424
12. H. Singh, A. Ganapule, and V. Malhotra Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children J Endourol 21 2007 1461 1466
13. G. Janetshek, R. Peschel, and G. Bartsch Laparoscopic Fenger plasty J Endourol 14 2000 889 893
14. T. Szydelko, J. Kasprzak, and W. Apoznanski Modified laparoscopic YV pyeloplasty: experience of a single center J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19 2009 633 636
15. T. Inagaki, K.H. Rha, and A.M. Ong Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status BJU Int 95 2005 102 105
16. P. Casale, R.W. Grady, and B.D. Joyner Comparison of dismembered and non-dismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient J Endourol 18 2004 875 878
17. P.O. Szavay, T. Luithle, and G. Seitz Functional outcome after laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children J Pediatr Urol 6 2010 359 363
18. F. Almodhen, R. Jednak, and J.P. Capolicchio Is routine renography required after pyeloplasty? J Urol 184 2010 1128 1133