Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Current status

BJU International, Supplement

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 102-105

  Inagaki, Takeshi ^a   Rha, Koon H ^a   Ong, Albert M ^a   Kavoussi, Louis R ^a   Jarrett, Thomas W ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Pelvi ureteric obstruction; Pyeloplasty

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANDERSON HYNES DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY; BLEEDING; CONFERENCE PAPER; ECHOGRAPHY; FENGER PLASTY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LITHOTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; RENOGRAPHY; SCHOOL CHILD; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; Y V PLASTY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION;

EID: 14644445147     PISSN: 14655101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Arun N, Kekre NS, Nath V, Gopalakrishnan G. Is open pyeloplasty still justified? Br J Urol 1997; 80: 379-81
2. O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 2001; 8: 287-9
3. Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, Schuessler WW, Moore RG. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology 1995; 46: 791-5
4. Kim FJ, Herrell SD, Jahoda AE, Albala DM. Complications of Acucise endopyelotomy. J Endourol 1998; 12: 433-6
5. Gerber GS, Kim JC. Ureteroscopic endopyelotomy in the treatment of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2000; 55: 198-202
6. Lam JS, Cooper KL, Greene TD, Gupta M. Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy. Urology 2003; 61: 1107-11
7. Gupta M, Tuncay OL, Smith AD. Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: a 12-year perspective. J Urol 1997; 157: 1613-8
8. Van Cangh PJ, Wilmart JF, Opsomer RJ, Abi-Aad A, Wese FX, Lorge F. Long-term results and late recurrence after endoureteropyelotomy: a critical analysis of prognostic factors. J Urol 1994; 151: 934-7
9. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150: 1795-9
10. Moore RG, Averch TD, Schulam PG, Adams JB, Chen RN, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: experience with the initial 30 cases. J Urol 1997; 157: 459-62
11. Recker F, Subotic B, Goepel M, Tscholl R. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: preliminary report. J Urol 1995; 153: 1601-4
12. Pattaras JG, Moore RG. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2000; 14: 895-904
13. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic Fenger plasty. J Endourol 2000; 14: 889-93
14. Soulie M, Salomon L, Patard JJ et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol 2001; 166: 48-50
15. Eden CG, Cahill D, Allen JD. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int 2001; 88: 526-31
16. Türk IA, Davis JW, Winkelmann B et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty - the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 268-75
17. Albani J, Streem SB. Endopyelotomy: Determining the durability of endourologic intervention. J Urol 2003; 169 (Suppl. 4): A96
18. Desai MM, Gill IS, Carvalhal EF et al. Percutaneous endopyeloplasty: a novel technique. J Endourol 2002; 16: 431-43
19. Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Wani K, Desai MR. Percutaneous endopyeloplasty: description of new technique. J Urol 2002; 168: 2097-102
20. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Altarac S, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 1996; 47: 311-6
21. Motola JA, Fried R, Badlani GH, Smith AD. Failed endopyelotomy: implications for future surgery on the ureteropelvic junction. J Urol 1993; 150: 821-3
22. Baldwin DD, Dunbar JA, Wells N, McDougall EM. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2003; 17: 155-60
23. Sundaram CP, Grubb RL, Rehman J et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2003; 169: 2037-40
24. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol 2002; 167: 1253-6
25. Partin AW, Adams JB, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 181: 552-7
26. Sung GT, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the DA Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology 2001; 58: 893-8
27. Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the da Vinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 453-7
28. Gettman MT, Lotan Y, Roerhborn CG, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Cost-effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a decision tree analysis. J Urol 2003; 169: 228-32