Laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with open pyeloplasty in children

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 897-902

  Ravish, I R ^a   Nerli, R B ^a   Reddy, Mallikarjun N ^a   Amarkhed, Shrishailesh S ^a  

^a KLES DR PRABHAKAR KORE HOSPITAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PYELOPLASTY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROPERITONEUM; SCHOOL CHILD; STANDARD; SURGICAL APPROACH; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT; LAPAROSCOPY; LONGEVITY; MORBIDITY; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 34548848818     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.0411     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retro-caval ureter: A case diagnosed preoperatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol 1949;21:209
2. Tan H. Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 1999;162:1045.
3. Yeung CK, Tam YH, Sihoe JD, Lee KH, Liu KW. Retroperitoneoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction obstruction in infants and children. Br J Urol 2001;87;509.
4. El Ghoneimi A. Laparoscopic management of hydronephrosis in children. World J Urol 2004;22:415.
5. Soulie M, Thoulouzan M, Seguin P, Mouly P, Vazzoler N, Pontonnier F et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: Comparison of two surgical approaches. Urology 2001;57:443
6. Reddy MN, Nerli RB, Bashetty R, Ravish IR. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 2005;174:700.
7. Nadler RB, Rao GS, Pearle MS, Nakada SY, Clayman RV. Acucise endopyelotomy: Assessment of long-term durability. J Urol 1996;156:1094.
8. Notley RG, Beaurgie JM. The long term follow up of Anderson Hynes pyeloplasty for hydronephrosis. Br J Urol 1973;45:464.
9. Perksy L, Kraurse JR, Boltuch RL. Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1977;118:162.
10. Faerber GJ, Richardson TD, Farah N. Retrograde treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction using the ureteral cutting balloon catheter. J Urol 1997;157:454.
11. Brooks JD, Kouvossi LR, Preminger GM. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the ureteropelvic junction. Urology 1995;46:791.
12. Kavoussi LR, Peters CA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150:189.
13. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1795.
14. Ben Slama MR, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Initial experience in 15 cases. Urology 2000;56:45.
15. Bauer JJ, Bishoff JT, Moore RG, Chen RN, Iverson AJ, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol 1999;162:692.
16. Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Kratzik C, Marberger MJ. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2003;44: 340.
17. Bonnard A, Fouquet V, Carricaburu E, Aigrain Y, El Ghoneimi A. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 2005;173:1710.
18. Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Gettman MT. Robetch pyeloplasty: Technique and results. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:737.
19. Metzelder ML, Schier F, Petersen C, Truss M, Ure BM. Laparoscopic transabdominal pyeloplasty in children is feasible irrespective of age. J Urol 2006;175:688.