Modified laparoscopic Y-V pyeloplasty: Experience of a single center

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 633-636

  Szydełko, Tomasz ^a   Kasprzak, Jarosław ^a   Apoznański, Wojciech ^a  

^a WROCLAW MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; HYDRONEPHROSIS; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODIFIED LAPAROSCOPIC Y V PYELOPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; RENOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; UROGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDRONEPHROSIS; KIDNEY DISEASES; KIDNEY PELVIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70350343697     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2009.0032     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1795-2179.
2. Kavoussi LR, Peters CA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1891-1894.
3. Tuerk IA, Davis JW, Winkelmann B, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty-the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vesels. Eur Urol 2002;42:268-275.
4. Eden CG, Cahill D, Allen JD. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int 2001;88:526-531.
5. Ost MC, Kaye JD, Guttman MJ, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: Comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2005;66(Suppl 5A):47-51.
6. Rassweiler JJ, Subotic S, Feist-Schwenk M, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Long-term experience with algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty. J Urol 2007;177:1000-1005.
7. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic Fenger plasty. J Endourol 2000;14:889-893.
8. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253-1256.
9. Bauer JJ, Bishoff JT, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol 1999;162:692-695.
10. Shoma AM, El Nahas AR, Bazeed MA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A prospective, randomized comparison between the transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol 2007;178:2020-2024.
11. Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, et al. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2003; 44:340-345.