Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A versatile alternative to open pyeloplasty

Urologia Internationalis

Volumn 83, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 420-424

  Srivastava, Aneesh ^a   Singh, Pratipal ^a   Maheshwari, Ruchir ^a   Ansari, Mohd S ^a   Dubey, Deepak ^a   Kapoor, Rakesh ^a   Kumar, Anant ^a   Mandhani, Anil ^a  

^a SANJAY GANDHI POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Pelviureteric junction obstruction; Pyelolithotomy; Pyeloplasty

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CYSTOSCOPE; CYSTOSCOPY; DIURETIC THERAPY; DOUBLE J STENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY SCINTISCANNING; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; RENOGRAPHY; RETROPERITONEUM; SCHOOL CHILD; STENT; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL DRAINAGE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; WOUND DRAINAGE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 72049092006     PISSN: 00421138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000251182     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, et al: Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology 1995; 46: 791-795.
2. Meretyk I, Meretyk S, Clayman RV: Endopyelotomy: comparison of ureteroscopic retrograde and antegrade percutaneous technique. J Urol 1992; 148: 775-782.
3. Knudson BE, Cook AJ, Watterson JD, et al: Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long term results from one institution. Urology 2004; 63: 230-234.
4. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuahuey LV, et al: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 50: 1795-1799.
5. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol 2002; 167: 1253-1256.
6. Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status. BJU Int 2005; 95: 102-105.
7. Moon DA, El-Shazly MA, Chang CM, Gianduzzo TR, Eden CG: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 2006; 67: 932-936.
8. Mandhani A, Kumar D, Kumar A, Dubey D, Kapoor R: Steps to reduce operative time in laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for moderate to large renal pelvis. Urology 2005; 66: 981-986.
9. Mandhani A, Kumar D, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Dubey D, Srivastava A, Bhandari M: Safety profile and complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a critical analysis. J Endourol 2005; 19: 797-802.
10. Mandhani A, Goel S, Bhandari M: Is antegrade stenting superior to retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty? J Urol 2004; 177: 1440-1442.
11. Minervini A, Davenport K, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG: Antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy for pelvi-uretaric junction (PUJ) obstruction. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 536-543.
12. Albani J, Streem SB: Endopyelotomy: determining the durability of endourologic intervention. J Urol 2003; 169(suppl 4):A96.
13. Ost MC, Kaye JD, Guttman MJ, Lee BR, Smith AD: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2005; 66(suppl 5A):47-51.
14. Desai MM, Gill IS, Carvalhal EF, et al: Percutaneous endopyeloplasty: a novel technique. J Endourol 2002; 16: 431-443.
15. Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Wani K, Desai MR: Percutaneous endopyeloplasty: description of new technique. J Urol 2002; 168: 2097-2102.
16. Soulie M, Salomon L, Patard JJ, et al: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol 2001; 166: 48-50. (Pubitemid 32565339)
17. Turk IA, Davis JW, Winkelmann B, et al: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty - the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 268-275.
18. Klinger HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Kratzik C, Marberger MJ: Comparison of open verses laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 340-345.
19. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Bartsch G: Laparoscopic Fenger plasty. J Endourol 2000; 14: 889-893.
20. Ramakumar S, Lancicni V, Chan DY, Parsons JK, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy. J Urol 2002; 167: 1378-1380.
21. Ball AJ, Leveillee RJ, Patel VR, Wong C: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty and flexible nephroscopy: simultaneous treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and nephrolithiasis. JSLS 2004; 8: 223-228.
22. Sundaram CP, Grubb RL, Clayman RV, et al: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2003; 169: 2037-2040.
23. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Franscher F, et al: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 695-704.
24. Zhang X, Li H, Ma X, et al: Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2006; 176: 1077-1080.