Demographic Factors Affecting Long-Term Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 417, Issue , 2003, Pages 62-73

  Röder, Christoph ^a   Parvizi, Javad ^a   Eggli, Stefan ^a   Berry, Daniel J ^b   Müller, Maurice E ^a   Busato, Andre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; BODY MASS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0345060434     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF: Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: Factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg 84A:171-177, 2002.
2. Brand RA, Pedersen DR, Yoder SA: How definition of "loosening" affects the incidence of loose total hip reconstructions. Clin Orthop 210:185-191, 1986.
3. Bryant MJ, Kemohan WG, Nixon JR, Mollan RA: A statistical analysis of hip scores. J Bone Joint Surg 75B:705-709, 1993.
4. Callaghan JJ, Albright JC, Goetz DD, Olejniczak JP, Johnston RC: Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement: Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 82A:487-497, 2000.
5. Callaghan JJ, Dysart SH, Savory CF, Hopkinson WJ: Assessing the results of hip replacement: A comparison of five different rating systems. J Bone Joint Surg 72B:1008-1009, 1990.
6. Charnley J: The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg 54B:61-76, 1972.
7. Dawson J, Jameson-Shortall E, Emerton M, et al: Issues relating to long-term follow-up in hip arthroplasty surgery: A review of 598 cases at 7 years comparing 2 prostheses using revision rates, survival analysis, and patient-based measures. J Arthroplasty 15:710-717, 2000.
8. DeLee JG, Charnley J: Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121:20-32, 1976.
9. Emery D, Britton A, Clarke H, Grover M: The Stanmore total hip arthroplasty: A 15- to 20-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 12:728-735, 1997.
10. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE: Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 257:107-128, 1990.
11. Ferguson AB, Howorth MB: Slipping of the upper femoral epiphysis. JAMA 97:1867-1872, 1931.
12. Greenfield S, Apolone G, McNeil BJ, Cleary PD: The importance of co-existent disease in the occurrence of postoperative complications and one-year recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement: Comorbidity and outcomes after hip replacement. Med Care 31:141-154, 1993.
13. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17-27, 1979.
14. Harris WH: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 51A:737-755, 1969.
15. Hodgkinson JP, Shelley P, Wroblewski BM: The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 228:105-109, 1988.
16. Johanson NA: Outcomes Assessment. In Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, (eds). The Adult Hip. Philadelphia, Lippincott Raven Publishers 853-863, 1998.
17. Johnsson R, Thorngren KG: Function after total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis. Int Orthop 13:221-225, 1989.
18. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH, Harris WH, et al: Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement: A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg 72A:161-168, 1990.
19. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME: Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroptasties in a community based population. J Rheumatol 27: 1745-1752, 2000.
20. Liang MH, Cullen KE, Larson MG, et al: Cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 29:937-943, 1986.
21. Lingard E, Hashimoto H, Sledge C: Development of outcome research for total joint arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 5:175-177, 2000.
22. March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley H, et al: Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis: A prospective cohort study comparing patients' quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population norms. Med J Aust 171:235-238, 1999.
23. Merle d'Aubigné R, Postel M: Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 36A:451-475, 1954.
24. Paterson D: The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES). Orthopedics 16:11-14, 1993.
25. Pettine KA, Aamlid BC, Cabanela ME: Elective total hip arthroplasty in patients older than 80 years of age. Clin Orthop 266:127-132, 1991.
26. Wiklund I, Romanus B: A comparison of quality of life before and after arthroplasty in patients who had arthrosis of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg 73A: 765-769, 1991.
27. Wroblewski BM, Fleming PA, Siney PD: Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty of the hip: 20-to-30 year results. J Bone Joint Surg 81B:427-430, 1999.
28. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD: Charnley low-friction arthroplasty of the hip: Long-term results. Clin Orthop 292:191-201, 1993.
29. Young NL, Cheah D, Waddell JP, Wright JG: Patient characteristics that affect the outcome of total hip arthroplasty: A review. Can J Surg 41:188-195, 1998.