An integrative genomics approach to biomarker discovery in breast cancer

Cancer Informatics

Volumn 10, Issue , 2011, Pages 185-204

  Hicks, Chindo ^a   Asfour, Rozana ^b   Pannuti, Antonio ^a   Miele, Lucio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Genome wide association studies gene expression pathway

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; TUMOR MARKER;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE MARKER; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MAPPING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; PREDICTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

EID: 80053599055     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11769351     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4137/CIN.S6837     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2009-10. American Cancer Society, Inc. 250 Williams Street, NW, Atlanta, GA. 30303.ic
2. Golub TR, Slonin DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, Mesirov JP, et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science. 1999;286:531-7.
3. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747-52.
4. Van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van't Veer LJ, et al. A gene expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. New Eng J Med. 2002;347(25): 1999-2009.
5. Weigelt B, Hu Z, He X, et al. Molecular portraits and 70-gene prognosis signature are preserved throughout the metastatic process of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65(20):9155-8.
6. Hunter DJ, Kraft P, Jacobs KB, Cox DG, Yeager M, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies alleles in FGFR2 associated with risk of sporadic postmenopausal breast cancer. Nature Genet. 2007;39(7)870-4.
7. Easton DF, Pooley KA, Dunning AM, Pharoah PD, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature. 2007;447(7148):1087-93.
8. Stacey SN, Manolescu A, Sulem P, Rafnar T, Gudmundsson J, et al. Common variants on Chromosomes 2q35 and 16q12 confer susceptibility to estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Nature Genet. 2007;39(7):865-9.
9. Commonly Studied Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer: results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(19):1382-96.
10. Turnbull C, Ahmed S, Morrison J, Pernet D, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five new breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature Genetics. 2010;42(6):504-7.
11. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Shetty PB, Guan X, et al. FGFR2 and other loci identified in genome-wide association studies are associated with breast cancer in African American and young women. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31(18):1417-23.
12. Zhong H, Yang X, Kaplan LM, Molony C, Schadt EE. Integrating pathway analysis and genetics in gene expression for genome-wide association studies. Amer J Hum Genet. 2010;86:581-91.
13. Hindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, et al. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide assocition loci for human diseases and traits. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2009 DOI 10.1073/pnas.0903103106
14. Holman P, Green EK, Pahwa JS, Ferreira MAR, et al. Gene ontolology analysis of GWA study data sets provides insights into the biology of bipolar disorder. Amer J Hum Genet. 2009;85:13-24.
15. Chen D, Nasir A, Culhane A, et al. Proliferative genes dominate malignancyrisk gene signature in historically-normal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 DOI 10.1007/s10549-009-0344-y
16. Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucl Acids Res. 2002;30(1):207-10.
17. Ni IBP, Zakaria Z, Muhammad R, et al. Gene expression patterns distinguish breast carcinomas from normal breast tissues: the Malaysia context. Pathology-Res Pract. 2010;206:223-8.
18. Lamason RL, Mohideen MA, Mest JR, Wong AC, et al. SLC24A5, a putative cation exchanger, affects pigmentaion in zebrafish and humans. Science. 2005;310:1782-6.
19. Helgadottir A, Manolescu A, Helgason A, et al. A variant of the gene encoding leukotriene A4 hydrolase confers ethnicity-specific risk of myocardial infarction. Nat Genet. 2006;38:68-74.
20. Wang Y, Klijn JG, Zhang Y, et al. Gene expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet. 2005; 365(9460):671-9.
21. Microarray Analysis Suite 5.0, Affymetrix Inc. Santa Clara, California
22. Fisher RA. "Questions and answers #14". The American Statistician. 1948; 2(5):30-1.
23. Luo L, Peng G, Zhu Y, et al. Genome-wide gene and pathway analysis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:1045-53.
24. Peng G, Luo L, Siu H, et al. Gene and pathway-based second-wave analysis of genome-wide association studies. Europ J Hum Genet. 2010;18:111-7.
25. Wang K, Li M, Bucan M. Pathway-based approaches to analysis of genomewide association studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:1278-83.
26. Berger JA, Hautaniemi S, Jarvinen A-K, Edgren H, Mitra SK, Astola J. Optimized lowess normalization parameter selection for DNA microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004;5:194
27. Radmacher MD, Mcshane LM, Simon R. A paradigm for class prediction using gene expression profiles. J Comput Biol. 2002;9(3):505-11.
28. Lehmann EL, Stein C. On the theory of some nonparametric hypotheses. Ann Math Stat. 1949;20:28-45.
29. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Yosef. "Controlling the false discovery rat: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing". J Royal Stat Society. Series B Methodology. 1995;57(1):289-300.
30. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 95: 14863-8.
31. Morrissey ER, Diaz-Uriarte R. Pomello II: finding differentially expressed genes. Nucl Acids Res. 2009;37:W581-6.
32. Reich M, Liefeld T, Gould J, Lerner J, Tamayo P. GenePattern 2.0. Nature Genetics. 2006;38(5):500-1.
33. Breitkreutz B, Stark C, Tyers M. Osprey: a network visualization system. BMC Genome Biology. 2003;4:R22
34. Gene Ontology Consortium. Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation. Genome Res. 2001;11:1425-33.
35. Stranger BE, Forrest MS, Clark AG, et al. Genome-wide associations of gene expression variation in Humans. PLoS Genetics. 2005;1(6):e78
36. Oleksiak MF, Churchill GA, Crawford DL. Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations. Nature Genetics. 2002;32:261-6.
37. Gorlov IP, Gallick GE, Gorlova OY, et al. GWS meets microarray: are the results of genome-wide association studies and gene expression profiling consistent? Prostate cancer as an example. PLoS One. 2009;4(8):e6511
38. Park J, Wachoder S, Gail MH, et al. Estimation of effect size distribution from genome-wide association studies and implications for future discoveries. Nature Genetics. 2010;42(7):570-5.
39. Evangelo E, Maraganore DM, Ioannidis. Meta-analysis in genome-wide association data sets: strategies and application in parkinson disease. PLoS One. 2007;2:e196
40. Ionnidis JP, Patsopoulos NA, Evangelou E. Heterogeneity in Meta-analyses in genome-wide association investigations. PLoS One. 2007;9:e841
41. Churbanov A, Vorechovsky I, Hicks C. A method for predicting changes in human gene splicing induced by genetic variants in context of cis-acting elements. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:12
42. Eleftherohorinou H, Wright V, Hoggart C, et al. Pathway analysis of GWAS provides new insights into genetic susceptibility to 3 inflammatory diseases. PLoS One. 2009;4(11):e8068
43. Askland K, Read C, Moore J. Pathway based analysis of whole-genome association study data in bipolar disorder reveal genes mediating ion channel activity and synaptic neurotransmission. Hum Genet. 2009;125:63-79.
44. Baranzini SE, Galwey NW, Wang J, et al. Pathway and network analysis of genome-wide association studies in multiple sclerosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(11):2078-90.
45. Haiman CA, Hsu C, de Bakker PIW, et al. Comprehensive association testing of common genetic variation in DNA repair pathway genes in relationship with breast cancer risk in multiple populations. Hum Mol Genet. 2008; 17(6):825-34.
46. Menashe I, Maeder D, Garcia-Closas M, et al. Pathway analysis of breast cancer genome-wide association study highlights three pathways and one canonical signaling cascade. Cancer Res. 2010;7(11):4453-9.
47. Torkamani A, Topol EJ, Schork NJ. Pathway analysis of seven common diseases assessed by genome-wide association. Genomics. 2008;92: 265-78.
48. Li B, Leal SM. Methods for detecting associations with rare variants for common diseases: application to analysis of sequence data. Amer J Hum Genet. 2008;83:311-21.
49. Bhatia G, Bansal V, Harismendy O, et al. A covering method for detecting genetic associations between rare variants and common phenotypes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(10):e1000954
50. Mayer KB, Maia A, O'Reilley M. Allele-specific up-regulation of FGFR2 increases susceptibility to breast cancer. PLoS Biology. 2008;6(5):e108
51. Huijts PEA, Vreeswijk MPG, et al. Clinical correlates of low-risk variants in FGFR2, TNRC9, MAP3K1, LSP1, and 8q24 in Dutch cohort of incident breast cancer cases. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:R78.