Different research markets: A disciplinary perspective

Higher Education

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 721-740

  Ylijoki, Oili Helena ^a   Lyytinen, Anu ^a   Marttila, Liisa ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Finland)

Author keywords

Academic capitalism; Academic research; Commercialisation; Disciplinary differences; University society relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053574189     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-011-9414-2     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aittola, H., & Marttila, L. (Eds.). (2010). Yliopistojen rakenteellinen kehittäminen, akateemiset yhteisöt ja muutos [Universities' structural development, academic communities and change] (Vol. 5). Finland: Publications of the Ministry of Education.
2. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Milton Keynes: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
3. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Milton Keynes: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
4. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Guildford: Pergamon.
5. Crespo, M., & Dridi, H. (2007). Intensification of university-industry relationships and its impact on academic research. Higher Education, 54, 61-84.
6. Croissant, J. L., & Smith-Doerr, L. (2000). Organizational contexts of science: Boundaries and relationships between university and industry. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 691-718). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
7. Deem, R. (1998). 'New managerialism' and higher education: the management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47-70.
8. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy. A triple helix of university-industry-government. London: Pinter.
9. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
10. Gulbrandsen, M., & Kyvik, S. (2010). Are the concepts basic research, applied research and experimental development still useful? An empirical investigation among Norwegian academics. Science and Public Policy, 37(5), 343-353.
11. Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J.-C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research Policy, 34, 932-950.
12. Hakala, J. (2009). Academic cultures in the Finnish mass research university. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1400. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
13. Hakala, J., & Ylijoki, O.-H. (2001). Research for whom? Research orientations in three academic cultures. Organization, 8, 373-380.
14. Häyrinen-Alestalo, M., & Peltola, U. (2006). The problem of a market-oriented university. Higher Education, 52, 251-281.
15. Hessels, L. K., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37(4), 740-760.
16. Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56, 303-324.
17. Kaukonen, E., & Nieminen, M. (1999). Modelling the triple helix from a small country perspective: The case of Finland. Journal of Technology Transfer, 24, 173-183.
18. Kutinlahti, P. (2005). Universities approaching market. Intertwining scientific and entrepreneurial goals. VTT publications 589. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
19. Kyvik, S. (2007). Changes in funding university research: Consequences for problem choice and research output of academic staff. In J. Enders & B. Jongbloed (Eds.), Public-private dynamics in higher education (pp. 387-411). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
20. Löppönen, P., Lehvo, A., Vaahtera K., & Nuutinen, A. (Eds.). (2009). The state and quality of scientific research in Finland 2009. Publications of the Academy of Finland 10.
21. Lyytinen, A., Marttila, L., Ylijoki, O.-H., & Kaukonen, E. (2010). Rakenteet muuttuvat-muuttuuko tutkimus? [Structures are changing-What about research?]. In H. Aittola & L. Marttila (Eds.), Yliopistojen rakenteellinen kehittäminen, akateemiset yhteisöt ja muutos [Universities' structural development, academic communities and change] (Vol. 5, pp. 23-49). Finland: Reports of the Ministry of Education.
22. Martin, B. R., & Etzkowitz, H. (2000). The origin and evolution of the university species. Vest, 13(3-4), 9-34.
23. Marttila, L., Lyytinen, A., & Ylijoki, O.-H. (2010). Tutkimusyhteisöjen ja akateemisen työn muutos. Laitosjohtajakyselyn tulokset [The transformation of research communities and academic work. The survey results]. Working papers 5. The Unit for Science, Technology and Innovation Studies, University of Tampere.
24. Massy, W. F. (2009). Academic values in the marketplace. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(3), 1-16.
25. Merton, R. (1968). Science and democratic social structure. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press.
26. Metcalfe, A. S., & Fenwick, T. (2009). Knowledge for whose society? Knowledge production, higher education, and federal policy in Canada. Higher Education, 57, 209-225.
27. Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, P. N. (2005). Universities in national innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 209-239). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Nieminen, M. (2005). Academic research in change. Transformation of Finnish university policies and university research during the 1990s. Helsinki: The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.
29. Nieminen, M., & Kaukonen, E. (2004). Universities and science-industry relationships: Making a virtue out of necessity? In G. Schienstock (Ed.), Embracing the knowledge economy (pp. 196-218). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
30. Pelkonen, A. (2008). The Finnish competition state and entrepreneurial policies in the Helsinki region. Research reports 254. Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki.
31. Puuska, H.-M. (2010). Effects of scholar's gender and professional position on publishing productivity in different publication types. Analysis of a Finnish university. Scientometrics, 82, 419-437.
32. Puuska, H.-M., & Miettinen, M. (2008). Julkaisukäytännöt eri tieteenaloilla [Publication patterns in different disciplines] (Vol. 33). Finland: Publications of the Ministry of Education.
33. Shinn, T. (2002). The triple helix and new production of knowledge: Prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Science, 32, 599-614.
34. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
35. Statistics Finland. (2007). Research and development. http://www. stat. fi/til/tkke/index_en. html.
36. Tuunainen, J. (2005). Hybrid practices? Contributions to the debate on the mutation of science and university. Higher Education, 50, 275-298.
37. Tuunainen, J., & Knuuttila, T. (2008). Determining the norms of science: From epistemological criteria to local struggle on organizational rules? In J. Välimaa & O.-H. Ylijoki (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on higher education (pp. 67-80). Dordrecht: Springer.
38. Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56, 265-285.
39. Ylijoki, O.-H. (2003). Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideals and practices of university research. Higher Education, 45, 307-335.
40. Ylijoki, O.-H. (2008). A clash of academic cultures: The case of Dr. X. In J. Välimaa & O.-H. Ylijoki (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on higher education (pp. 75-89). Dordrecht: Springer.
41. Ziman, J. (1996). Post-academic science: Constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Science Studies, 9, 67-80.