Quantification of non-polar lipid deposits on senofilcon A Contact Lenses

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 88, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1172-1179

  Heynen, Miriam ^a   Lorentz, Holly ^a   Srinivasan, Sruthi ^a   Jones, Lyndon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

cholesterol; contact lens; deposition; dry eye; lens care solutions; lipids; Silicone hydrogel

Indexed keywords

CARE REGIMENS; CHOLESTEROL OLEATE; CIBA VISIONS; CROSS-OVER; DRY EYE; METHYL ESTERS; NON-POLAR; NORMAL PHASE; SILICONE HYDROGEL; SILICONE HYDROGELS; TOTAL LIPIDS; TRIOLEIN;

CHOLESTEROL; ESTERIFICATION; ESTERS; HYDROGELS; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; LIPIDS; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; METHANOL; OLEIC ACID; OXIDATION; SILICONES;

CONTACT LENSES;

LIPID; SENOFILCON A; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRY EYE; EQUIPMENT; EXTENDED WEAR CONTACT LENS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; MALE; METABOLISM; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; DRY EYE SYNDROMES; EQUIPMENT CONTAMINATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; LIPIDS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SILICONES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053376074     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31822a5295     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein and lipid deposition onto hydrophilic contact lenses in vivo. CLAO J 2001;27:75-80. (Pubitemid 32423383)
2. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Jentoft N. Protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. III. Mucin. Biomaterials 1986;7:9-16. (Pubitemid 16151608)
3. Jones L, Evans K, Sariri R, Franklin V, Tighe B. Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. CLAO J 1997;23:122-6. (Pubitemid 27176074)
4. Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A, Libow R, Harvey H. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:842-9. (Pubitemid 17070691)
5. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein-lipid interaction on the surface of a hydrophilic contact lens in vitro. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:776-81. (Pubitemid 27354976)
6. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, Sariri R, Tighe B. Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:16-21.
7. Maissa C, Franklin V, Guillon M, Tighe B. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and lipid deposition. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:697-705. (Pubitemid 28459984)
8. Rapp J, Broich JR. Lipid deposits on worn soft contact lenses. CLAO J 1984;10:235-9. (Pubitemid 14012317)
9. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75-9.
10. Gellatly KW, Brennan NA, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:937-41. (Pubitemid 19028405)
11. Lorentz H, Rogers R, Jones L. The impact of lipid on contact angle wettability. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:946-53. (Pubitemid 351339060)
12. Fonn D, Dumbleton K. Dryness and discomfort with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S101-4.
13. Aswad MI, John T, Barza M, Kenyon K, Baum J. Bacterial adherence to extended wear soft contact lenses. Ophthalmology 1990;97:296-302. (Pubitemid 20087975)
14. Butrus SI, Klotz SA. Contact lens surface deposits increase the adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Curr Eye Res 1990;9:717-24. (Pubitemid 20312994)
15. Taylor RL, Willcox MD, Williams TJ, Verran J. Modulation of bacterial adhesion to hydrogel contact lenses by albumin. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:23-9. (Pubitemid 28065170)
16. Allansmith MR, Korb DR, Greiner JV, Henriquez AS, Simon MA, Finnemore VM. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 1977;83:697-708. (Pubitemid 8136096)
17. Porazinski AD, Donshik PC. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent replacement contact lens wearers: A retrospective study. CLAO J 1999;25:142-7. (Pubitemid 29344697)
18. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:193-7.
19. Skotnitsky CC, Naduvilath TJ, Sweeney DF, Sankaridurg PR. Two presentations of contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) in hydrogel lens wear: Local and general. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:27-36. (Pubitemid 43361653)
20. Maziarz EP, Stachowski MJ, Liu XM, Mosack L, Davis A, Musante C, Heckathorn D. Lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel lenses, part I: Quantification of oleic acid, oleic acid methyl ester, and cholesterol. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:300-7. (Pubitemid 44747205)
21. Hart DE, Tidsale RR, Sack RA. Origin and composition of lipid deposits on soft contact lenses. Ophthalmology 1986;93:495-503. (Pubitemid 16111116)
22. Greiner JV, Glonek T, Korb DR, Booth R, Leahy CD. Phospholipids in meibomian gland secretion. Ophthalmic Res 1996;28:44-9. (Pubitemid 26152737)
23. Greiner JV, Glonek T, Korb DR, Leahy CD. Meibomian gland phospholipids. Curr Eye Res 1996;15:371-5. (Pubitemid 26140475)
24. Shine WE, McCulley JP. Polar lipids in human meibomian gland secretions. Curr Eye Res 2003;26:89-94. (Pubitemid 36776115)
25. McCulley JP, Shine W. A compositional based model for the tear film lipid layer. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1997;95:79-88.
26. Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: Effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989;15:185-8. (Pubitemid 19201038)
27. Fowler SA, Korb DR, Allansmith MR. Deposits on soft contact lenses of various water contents. CLAO J 1985;11:124-7. (Pubitemid 15084133)
28. Minno GE, Eckel L, Groemminger S, Minno B, Wrzosek T. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses: I. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. II. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:865-72.
29. Garrett Q, Laycock B, Garrett RW. Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41:1687-95. (Pubitemid 30354338)
30. Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, Royce FH. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:362-73. (Pubitemid 18078030)
31. Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, Franklin V, Tighe B. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:503-10.
32. Jones L, Senchyna M. Soft contact lens solutions review. Part 1: Components of modern care regimens. Optom Pract 2007;8:45-56.
33. Carney FP, Nash WL, Sentell KB. The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:120-4.
34. Pucker AD, Thangavelu M, Nichols JJ. Enzymatic quantification of cholesterol and cholesterol esters from silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:2949-54.
35. Zhao Z, Carnt NA, Aliwarga Y, Wei X, Naduvilath T, Garrett Q, Korth J, Willcox MD. Care regimen and lens material influence on silicone hydrogel contact lens deposition. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:251-9.
36. Saville JT, Zhao Z, Willcox MD, Blanksby SJ, Mitchell TW. Detection and quantification of tear phospholipids and cholesterol in contact lens deposits: The effect of contact lens material and lens care solution. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:2843-51.
37. Iwata M, Ohno S, Kawai T, Ichijima H, Cavanagh HD. In vitro evaluation of lipids adsorbed on silicone hydrogel contact lenses using a new gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analytical method. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:272-80.
38. Christensen B, Lebow K, White EM, Cedrone R, Bevington R. Effectiveness of citrate-containing lens care regimens: A controlled clinical comparison. Int Contact Lens Clin 1998;25:50-8. (Pubitemid 128360701)
39. Hong B, Bilbaut T, Chowhan M, Keith D, Quintana R, Turner F, Van Duzee B. Cleaning capability of citrate-containing versus noncitrate contact lens cleaning solutions: An in vitro comparative study. Int Contact Lens Clin 1994;21:237-40.
40. Simmons PA, Ridder WH, III, Edrington TB, Ho S, Lau KC. Passive protein removal by two multipurpose lens solutions: Comparison of effects on in vitro deposited and patient worn hydrogel contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1999;26:33-8.
41. Omali NB, Zhu H, Zhao Z, Ozkan J, Xu B, Borazjani R, Willcox MD. Effect of cholesterol deposition on bacterial adhesion to contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2011;88. (e-pub ahead of print).
42. Pucker AD, Thangavelu M, Nichols JJ. In vitro lipid deposition on hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:6334-40.
43. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Lipid deposits on hydrophilic and rigid gas permeable contact lenses. CLAO J 1994;20:242-5. (Pubitemid 24350575)