Effect of cholesterol deposition on bacterial adhesion to contact lenses

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 88, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 950-958

  Omali, Negar Babaei ^a,b   Zhu, Hua ^a,b   Zhao, Zhenjun ^a   Ozkan, Jerome ^a   Xu, Banglao ^a   Borazjani, Roya ^c   Willcox, Mark D P ^a,b  

^a BRIEN HOLDEN VISION INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c ALCON RESEARCH LTD   (United States)

Author keywords

Deposition; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; silicone hydrogel contact lenses; Staphylococcus aureus; tear film

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL ADHESION; BACTERIAL GROWTH; EX-VIVO; LENS SURFACE; P.AERUGINOSA; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; S. AUREUS; SILICONE HYDROGEL CONTACT LENSES; SILICONE HYDROGELS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; TEAR FILMS; VIABLE CELLS;

ADHESION; BACTERIA; BACTERIOLOGY; CONTACT LENSES; HYDROGELS; METHANOL; SILICONES;

CHOLESTEROL;

CHOLESTEROL;

ABSORPTION; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; EXTENDED WEAR CONTACT LENS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; MICROBIOLOGY; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY;

ABSORPTION; BACTERIAL ADHESION; CHOLESTEROL; CHROMATOGRAPHY, THIN LAYER; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; HUMANS; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 80051547150     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821cc683     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Holly FJ. Tear film physiology and contact lens wear. I. Pertinent aspects oftear film physiology. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1981;58: 324-30. (Pubitemid 12079833)
2. Holly FJ, Lemp MA. Tear physiology and dry eyes. Surv Ophthalmol 1977;22:69-87. (Pubitemid 8202636)
3. Shine WE, Mc Culley JP. Polar lipids in human meibomian gland secretions. Curr Eye Res 2003;26:89-94. (Pubitemid 36776115)
4. Greiner JV, Glonek T, Korb DR, Leahy CD. Meibomianglandphos-pholipids. Curr Eye Res 1996;15:371-5.
5. Mc Culley JP, Shine W. Acompositional based model for the tear film lipid layer. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1997;95:79-88; discussion 88-93.
6. Mc Culley JP, Shine WE. The lipid layer oftears: dependent on mei-bomian gland function. Exp Eye Res 2004;78:361-5. (Pubitemid 38183312)
7. Craig JP, Tomlinson A. Importance of the lipid layer in human tear film stabilityand evaporation. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:8-13. (Pubitemid 27114503)
8. Mathers WD, Lane JA. Meibomian gland lipids, evaporation, and tear film stability. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998;438:349-60. (Pubitemid 28303760)
9. Jones L, Evans K, Sariri R, Franklin V, Tighe B. Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. CLAO J 1997;23:122-6. (Pubitemid 27176074)
10. Maziarz EP, Stachowski MJ, Liu XM, Mosack L, Davis A, Musante C, Heckathorn D. Lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel lenses, part I: quantification ofoleic acid, oleic acid methyl ester, and cholesterol. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:300-7. (Pubitemid 44747205)
11. Okada E, Matsuda T, Yokoyama T, Okuda K. Lysozyme penetration in group IV soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:174-7. (Pubitemid 44510307)
12. Mochizuki H, Yamada M, Hatou S, Kawashima M, Hata S. Depo-sition of lipid, protein, and secretory phospholipase A2 on hydro-philic contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:46-9.
13. Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, Franklin V, Tighe B. An in vivo compar-ison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77:503-10.
14. Fonn D. Targeting contact lens induced dryness and discomfort: what properties will make lenses more comfortable. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:279-85. (Pubitemid 46624852)
15. Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye. Invest Ophthal-mol Vis Sci 2006;47:1319-28. (Pubitemid 46780736)
16. Gellatly KW, Brennan NA, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:937-41. (Pubitemid 19028405)
17. Timberlake GT, Doane MG, Bertera JH. Short-term, low-contrast visual acuity reduction associated with in vivo contact lens drying. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:755-60.
18. Nichols JJ, Ziegler C, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK. Self-reported dry eye disease across refractive modalities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46:1911-4.
19. Willcox MD, Harmis N, Cowell, Williams T, Holden. Bacterial interactions with contact lenses; effects oflens material, lens wear and microbial physiology. Biomaterials 2001;22:3235-47. (Pubitemid 32923330)
20. Willcox MD, Holden BA. Contact lens related corneal infections. Biosci Rep 2001;21:445-61. (Pubitemid 34211829)
21. Butrus SI, Klotz SA. Contact lens surface deposits increase the adhe-sion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Curr Eye Res 1990;9:717-24. (Pubitemid 20312994)
22. Aswad MI,John T, Barza M, Kenyon K, Baum J. Bacterial adherence to extended wear soft contact lenses. Ophthalmology 1990;97: 296-302. (Pubitemid 20087975)
23. Thakur A, Chauhan A, Willcox MD. Effect of lysozyme on adhesion and toxin release by Staphylococcus aureus. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1999;27:224-7. (Pubitemid 29429693)
24. Williams TJ, Schneider RP, Willcox MD. The effect of protein-coated contact lenses on the adhesion and viability of gram negative bacteria. Curr Eye Res 2003;27:227-35. (Pubitemid 37315482)
25. Taylor RL, Willcox MD, Williams TJ, Verran J. Modulation ofbac-terial adhesion to hydrogel contact lenses by albumin. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:23-9. (Pubitemid 28065170)
26. Butrus SI, Klotz SA, Misra RP. The adherence of Pseudomonas aerugi-nosa to soft contact lenses. Ophthalmology 1987;94:1310-4. (Pubitemid 17149342)
27. Zhang S, Borazjani RN, Salamone JC, Ahearn DG, Crow SA, Jr., Pierce GE. In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafil-con A hydrogel contact lenses: effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Cont Lens Ante-rior Eye 2005;28:113-9. (Pubitemid 41440041)
28. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, Sariri R, Tighe B. Spoilation and clinical performance ofmonthlyvs. three monthly Group II dispos-able contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:16-21.
29. Zhao Z, Carnt NA, Aiwarga Y, Wei X, Naduvilath T, Garrett Q, Korth J, Willcox MD. Care regimen and lens material influence on silicone hydrogel contact lens deposition. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86: 251-9.
30. Maissa C, Franklin V, Guillon M, Tighe B. Influence ofcontact lens material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and lipid deposition. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:697-705. (Pubitemid 28459984)
31. Saville JT, Zhao Z, Willcox MD, Blanksby SJ, Mitchell TW. Detec-tion and quantification oftear phospholipids and cholesterol in con-tact lens deposits: the effect of contact lens material and lens care solution. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:2843-51.
32. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75-9.
33. Nichols JJ. Deposition rates and lens care influence on galyfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:751-7. (Pubitemid 44581145)
34. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, May C, Forbes I, Glasier MA. Quan-titative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004; 28:25-36. (Pubitemid 38161171)
35. Iwata M, Ohno S, Kawai T, Ichijima H, Cavanagh HD. In vitro evaluation oflipids adsorbed on silicone hydrogel contact lenses using a new gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analytical method. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:272-80.
36. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Lipid deposits on hydrophilic and rigid gas permeable contact lenses. CLAO J 1994;20:242-5. (Pubitemid 24350575)
37. Hart DE, Lane BC, Josephson JE, Tisdale RR, Gzik M, Leahy R, Dennis R. Spoilage ofhydrogel contact lenses by lipid deposits. Tear-film potassium depression, fat, protein, and alcohol consumption. Ophthalmology 1987;94:1315-21. (Pubitemid 17149343)
38. Carney FP, Nash WL, Sentell KB. The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time. Invest Ophthal-mol Vis Sci 2008;49:120-4.
39. Klotz SA, Misra RP, Butrus SI. Contact lens wear enhances adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and binding oflectins to the cornea. Cornea 1990;9:266-70. (Pubitemid 20298641)
40. Miller MJ, Ahearn DG. Adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to hydrophilic contact lenses and other substrata. J Clin Microbiol 1987;25:1392-7. (Pubitemid 17098706)
41. Henriques M, Sousa C, Lira M, Elisabete M, Oliveira R, Azeredo J. Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to silicone-hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:446-50. (Pubitemid 40911481)
42. Boles SF, Refojo MF, Leong FL. Attachment of Pseudomonas to hu-man-worn, disposable etafilcon A contact lenses. Cornea 1992;11: 47-52.
43. Bruinsma GM, Rustema-Abbing M, de Vries J, Stegenga B, van der Mei HC, van der Linden ML, Hooymans JM, Busscher HJ. Influence of wear and overwear on surface properties of etafilcon A contact lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:3646-53. (Pubitemid 35470599)
44. Bruinsma GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials 2001;22:3217-24. (Pubitemid 32923328)
45. Borazjani RN, Levy B, Ahearn DG. Relative primary adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens and Staphylococcus aureus to HEMA-type contact lenses and an extended wear silicone hydrogel contact lens of high oxygen permeability. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2004;27:3-8. (Pubitemid 38240363)
46. Kodjikian L, Casoli-Bergeron E, Malet F, Janin-Manificat H, Freney J, Burillon C, Colin J, Steghens JP. Bacterial adhesion to conven-tional hydrogel and new silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:267-73.
47. Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Oliveira ME, Oliveira R, Vilar EY, Azeredo J. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:183-8. (Pubitemid 46971882)
48. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein andlipid deposition onto hydrophilic contact lenses in vivo. CLAO J 2001;27:75-80. (Pubitemid 32423383)
49. Marquart ME, Monds KS, Mc Cormick CC, Dixon SN, Sanders ME, Reed JM, Mc Daniel LS, Caballero AR, O'Callaghan RJ. Cholesterol as treatment for pneumococcal keratitis: cholesterol-specific inhibi-tion of pneumolysin in the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48:2661-6. (Pubitemid 351261218)
50. Sasaki H, Kojima M, Mori Y, Nakamura J, Shibasaki J. Enhancing effect ofpyrrolidone derivatives on transdermal penetration of 5-flu-orouracil, triamcinolone acetonide, indomethacin, and flurbiprofen. J Pharm Sci 1991;80:533-8.
51. Kijlstra A. The role of lactoferrin in the nonspecific immune response on the ocularsurface. Reg Immunol 1990-1991;3:193-7.
52. Fullard RJ, Tucker DL. Changes in human tear protein levels with progressively increasing stimulus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32:2290-301.
53. Sack RA,Tan KO, Tan A. Diurnaltearcycle:evidenceforanocturnal inflammatory constitutive tear fluid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:626-40.
54. Ellison RT, III, Giehl TJ, La Force FM. Damage of the outer mem-brane ofenteric gram-negative bacteria by lactoferrin and transferrin. Infect Immun 1988;56:2774-81. (Pubitemid 18259927)
55. Di Gaetano M, Stern GA, Zam ZS. The pathogenesis ofcontact lens-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa corneal ulceration. II. An animal model. Cornea 1986;5:155-8. (Pubitemid 17210990)