Democratic theory and citizen participation: Democracy models in the evaluation of public participation in science and technology

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 589-597

  Biegelbauer, Peter ^a   Hansen, Janus ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Austria)

^b Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEMOCRACY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MODEL TEST; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PLANNING THEORY; POLICY MAKING; POLITICAL THEORY; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 80053219754     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234211X13092649606404     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abels, G and A Bora 2004. Demokratische Technikbewertung. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
2. Biegelbauer, P 2010. 25 Jahre staatliche Steuerungsversuche in der Österreichischen Forschungs-, Technologie- und Innovationspolitik. Forschung steuern? Governance des österreichischen Innovationssystems, P Biegelbauer (ed.), pp 67-108. Innsbruck, Austria: Studienverlag.
3. Biegelbauer, P and S Mayer 2008. Regulatory impact assessment in Austria: promising regulations, disappointing practices. Critical Policy Analysis, 2(2), 118-142.
4. Biegelbauer, P, E Griessler and A Loeber 2010. Report on Democracy and Participation. Deliverable 2 CIT-PART-project. Vienna.
5. Bora, A 2010. Technoscientific normativity and the 'iron cage' of law. Science Technology, & Human Values, 35(1), 3-28.
6. Bora, A and H Hausendorf 2004. PARADYS. Participation and the dynamics of social positioning. Final report to the European Commission. Available at http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/iwt/projekte/paradys/Final_Report_PARADYS.pdf, last accessed18 December 2009.
7. Brown, M B 2006. Citizen panels and the concept of representation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(2), 203-225.
8. Brown, N and S Beynon-Jones 2011. UK. Interim report countrycase study CIT-PART-project. York.
9. Bucci, M and F Neresini 2008. Science and public participation. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, third edition, E J Hackett, O Amsterdamska, M Lynch and J Wajcman (eds.), pp 449-472. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
10. Bütschi, D, R Carius, M Decker, S Gram, A Grunwald et al. 2004. The practice of TA; science, interaction, and communication. In Bridges between Science, Society and Policy. Technology Assessment - Methods and Impacts, M Decker and M Ladikas (eds.), pp 13-56. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
11. Campbell, D and T D Barth 2009. Wie können Demokratie und Demokratiequalität gemessen werden? Modelle, Demokratie-Indices und Länderbeispiele im globalen Vergleich. SWS Rundschau, 49(2), 209-233.
12. Dahl, R A 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
13. de Jong, M and M Mentzel 2001. Policy and science: options for democratisation in European countries. Science and Public Policy, 28(6), 403-412.
14. Dryzek, J 2010. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15. Durant, J 1999. Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 313-319.
16. Einsiedel, E, M Jones and M Brieley 2011. Canada. Interim report country case study CIT-PART-project. Calgary, Canada.
17. Fischer, F 1993. Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences, 26(3), 165-187.
18. Gottweis, H 1998. Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Goven, J 2006. Dialogue, governance, and biotechnology: acknowledging the context of the conversation. Integrated Assessment Journal, 6(2), 99-116.
20. Griessler, E 2010. Weil das so ein heißes Thema ist, rühren wir das besser nicht an. Zur Regulierung kontroverser biomedizinischer Forschung in Österreich. Steuerung von Wissenschaft? Die Governance des österreichischen Innovationssystems. P. Biegelbauer, pp 143-186. Innsbruck, Austria: Studienverlag.
21. Griessler, E 2011. Switzerland. Interim report country case study CIT-PART-project. Vienna.
22. Griessler, E and P Biegelbauer 2011. Austria. Interimreport country case study CIT-PART-project. Vienna.
23. Hagendijk, R and A Irwin 2006. Public deliberation and governance: engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva, 44(2), 167-184.
24. Hajer, M and H Wagenaar (eds.) 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Hansen, J 2010. Biotechnology and Public Engagement in Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
26. Hansen, J 2011. Denmark. Interim report country case study CIT-PART-project. Copenhagen.
27. Hansson, K and S Lundin 2011. Sweden. Interim report country case study CIT-PART-project. Lund.
28. Held, D 1996. Models of Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
29. Horlich-Jones, T, J Walls, G Rowe, N Pidgeon, W Poortinga, G Murdock and T O'Riordan 2007. The GM Debate. Risk, Politics and Public Engagement. Routledge, London.
30. Jasanoff, S 2005. Designs on Nature. Princeton, NJ and Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.
31. Joly, P B and G Assouline 2001. Assessing public debate and participation in technology assessment in Europe. Final Report. June 2001 (Contract no. Bio-CT 980318). Available at http://www.inra.fr/internet/Directions/SED/science-gouvernance/pub/ADAPTA/adapta-pdg.pdf, last accessed 2December 2009.
32. Joss, S and S Bellucci (eds.) 2002. Participatory Technology Assessment. European Perspectives. London: Centre for the Study of Democracy.
33. Karlhofer, F and H Sickinger 1999. Korporatismus und Sozialpartnerschaft. In Zukunft der Sozialpartnerschaft, F Karlhofer and E Tálos (eds.), pp 241-276. Vienna: Signum Verlag.
34. Laird, F N 1993. Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decision-making. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 18(3), 341-361.
35. Lengwiler, M 2008. Participatory approaches in science and technology: historical origins and current practices in critical perspective. Science, Technology and Human Values, 33(2), 186-200.
36. Liberatore, A and S Funtowicz 2003. 'Democratising' expertise, 'expertising' democracy: what does this mean, and why bother? Science and Public Policy, 30(3), 146-150.
37. Montpetit, E 2008. Policy design for legitimacy: expert knowledge, citizens, time and inclusion in the United Kingdom's biotechnology sector. Public Administration, 86(1), 259-277.
38. Müller, T and S Pickel 2007. Wie lässt sich Demokratie am besten messen? Zur Konzeptqualität von Demokratie-Indizes. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 48(3), 511-539.
39. Peters, G B and J Pierre (eds.) 2001. Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. London: Routledge.
40. Plotke, D 1997. Representation is democracy. Constellations, 4(1), 19-34.
41. Prainsack, B, I Geesink and S Franklin 2008. Stem cell science 1998-2008: controversies and silences (guest editorial to a special issue). Science as Culture, 17(4), 351-362.
42. Reynolds, L and B Szerszynski 2006. Representing GM nation? PAGANINI Project. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.
43. Rhodes, R A W 1997. Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
44. Roberts, N 2004. Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration, 34(4),315-353.
45. Rowe, G and L Frewer 2000. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(1), 3-29.
46. Schmitter, P and J Grote 1997. Der korporatistische Sisyphus: Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 38(3), 530-554.
47. Sclove, R 1995. Democracy and Technology. New York and London: Guilford Press.
48. Seifert, F 2003. Demokratietheoretische Überlegungen zum österreichischen Gentechnik-Konflikt. SWS-Rundschau, 43(1), 106-128.
49. Steiner, J, A Bächtiger, M Spörndli and M R Steenbergen 2004. Deliberative Politics in Action: Analysing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Thompson, D F 2008. Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 11,497-520.
51. Turner, S P 2003. Liberal Democracy 3.0. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Urbinati, N and M Warren 2008. The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 387-412.
53. Versteeg, W and A Loeber 2011. The Netherlands. Interim report country case study CIT-PART-project. Amsterdam.
54. Weale, A 2001. Science advice, democratic responsiveness and public policy. Science and Public Policy, 28(6), 413-421.
55. Weber, M 2002. The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism (translated by Peter Baehr and Gordon C Wells), London: Penguin Books.
56. Webler, T and O Renn 1995. A brief primer on participation: philosophy and practice. In Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluation Models for Environmental Discourse, O Renn, T Webler and P Wiedemann (eds.), pp 17-23. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.