Coronary artery stenoses: Accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification - A subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial

Radiology

Volumn 261, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 100-108

  Vavere, Andrea L ^a   Arbab Zadeh, Armin ^a   Rochitte, Carlos E ^b   Dewey, Marc ^c   Niinuma, Hiroyuki ^d   Gottlieb, Ilan ^a   Clouse, Melvin E ^e   Bush, David E ^a   Hoe, John W M ^f   De Roos, Albert ^g   Cox, Christopher ^h   Lima, João A C ^a   Miller, Julie M ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^d IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f MOUNT ELIZABETH MEDICAL CENTRE   (Singapore)

^g LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^h JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY CALCIFICATION; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX;

EID: 80053077385     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110537     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2009 update-a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee . Circulation 2009;119(3):e21-e181.
2. Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsifl ikas I, et al. Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcifi cation on image quality and diagnostic accuracy . Radiology 2008;247(2):346-355.
3. Cordeiro MA, Miller JM, Schmidt A, et al. Non-invasive half millimetre 32 detector row computed tomography angiography accurately excludes signifi cant stenoses in patients with advanced coronary artery disease and high calcium scores . Heart 2006;92(5):589-597.
4. Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell JW, Hamon M. Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography-metaanalysis . Radiology 2007;245(3):720-731. (Pubitemid 350127342)
5. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study . J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(25):2135-2144.
6. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359(22:2324-2336.
7. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coro nary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46(3):552-557. (Pubitemid 41040301)
8. Dewey M, Vavere AL, Arbab-Zadeh A, et al. Patient characteristics as predictors of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT compared with conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery stenoses: CORE-64 multicenter international trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(1):93-102.
9. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(21):1724-1732.
10. Dewey M, Hamm B. CT coronary angiography: examination technique, clinical results, and outlook on future developments [in German]. Rofo 2007;179(3):246-260. (Pubitemid 46769326)
11. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography with the Use of a Submillimeter Resolution (CACTUS) trial. Eur Heart J 2007;28(24):3034-3041. (Pubitemid 350262249)
12. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Hunink MG, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography by using different generations of multisection scanners: single-center experience. Radiology 2008;246(2):384-393.
13. Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK, et al. Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: infl uence of calcification. Am Heart J 2006;151(6):1323.e1-1323.e6.
14. Meng L, Cui L, Cheng Y, et al. Effect of heart rate and coronary calcifi cation on the diagnostic accuracy of the dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Korean J Radiol 2009;10(4):347-354.
15. Gottlieb I, Miller JM, Arbab-Zadeh A, et al. The absence of coronary calcifi cation does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55(7):627-634.
16. Miller JM, Dewey M, Vavere AL, et al. Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64 . Eur Radiol 2009;19(4):816-828.
17. Dewey M, Laule M, Krug L, et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16- slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Invest Radiol 2004;39(4):223-229. (Pubitemid 38391787)
18. Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, et al. Patterns of calcifi cation in coronary artery disease: a statistical analysis of intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiography in 1155 lesions. Circulation 1995;91(7):1959-1965.
19. Anderberg M . Cluster analysis for applications. New York, NY : Academic Press, 1973;161.
20. Zou KH, O'Malley AJ, Mauri L. Receiveroperating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models. Circulation 2007;115(5):654-657. (Pubitemid 46226175)
21. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. London, England : Chapman & Hall, 1993.
22. Zhang S, Levin DC, Halpern EJ, Fischman D, Savage M, Walinsky P. Accuracy of MDCT in assessing the degree of stenosis caused by calcifi ed coronary artery plaques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(6):1676-1683.
23. Dewey M . Coronary CT versus MR angiography: pro CT-the role of CT angiography. Radiology 2011;258(2):329-339.
24. Kitagawa K, George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Lima JA, Lardo AC. Characterization and correction of beam-hardening artifacts during dynamic volume CT assessment of myocardial perfusion. Radiology 2010;256(1):111-118.
25. Yamada M, Jinzaki M, Imai Y, et al. Evaluation of severely calcifi ed coronary artery using fast-switching dual-kVp 64-slice computed tomography. Circ J 2011;75(2):472-473.
26. Tanami Y, Jinzaki M, Yamada M, Imai Y, Segawa K, Kuribayashi S. Improvement of in-stent lumen measurement accuracy with new High-Defi nition CT in a phantom model: comparison with conventional 64-detector row CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging doi:10. 1007/s10554-010-9786-x. Published online January 8, 2011. Accessed May 11, 2011.