Improvement of in-stent lumen measurement accuracy with new High-Definition CT in a phantom model: Comparison with conventional 64-detector row CT

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 337-342

  Tanami, Yutaka ^a   Jinzaki, Masahiro ^a   Yamada, Minoru ^b   Imai, Yasuhiro ^c   Segawa, Koji ^c   Kuribayashi, Sachio ^a  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c GE HealthCare Japan   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Coronary artery; In stent restenosis

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84861482335     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 15730743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9786-x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Morice MC, Colombo A, Meier B et al (2006) Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. Jama 295:895-904
2. Holmes DR Jr., Leon MB, Moses JW et al (2004) Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis. Circulation 109:634-640 (Pubitemid 38198871)
3. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256-268 (Pubitemid 43149624)
4. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535-546
5. Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F et al (2008) Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J 29:531-556 (Pubitemid 351264173)
6. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D et al (2006) Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 27:2567-2572 (Pubitemid 44627301)
7. Kumbhani DJ, Ingelmo CP, Schoenhagen P et al (2009) Meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy of 64-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 103:1675-1681
8. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/ SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY WRITING GROUP, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1864-1894
9. Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T et al (2005) Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16- slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 40:8-13 (Pubitemid 40029888)
10. Vartuli JS, Lyons RJ, Vess CJ et al (2008) GE Healthcare's New Computed Tomography Scintillator - Gemstone. Symposium on Radiation Measurement and Applications, June 2-5, Berkeley, California
11. Min JK, Swaminathan RV, Vass M et al (2009) High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standarddefinition 64-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:246-251
12. Sheth T, Dodd JD, Hoffmann U et al (2007) Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:933-938 (Pubitemid 46897923)