Rapid averaging? Not so fast!

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 484-489

  Whiting, Brittany F ^a   Oriet, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; TIME; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIZE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052899910     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0071-3     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ariely, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12, 157-162.
2. Chong, S. C., Joo, S. J., Emmanouil, T., & Treisman, A. (2008). Statistical processing: Not so implausible after all. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1327-1334. doi:10.3758/PP.70.7.1327
3. Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2003). Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 43, 393-404.
4. Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2005a). Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1-13.
5. Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2005b). Statistical processing: Computing the average size in perceptual groups. Vision Research, 45, 891-900. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.004
6. Choo, H., & Franconeri, S. L. (2010). Objects with reduced visibility still contribute to size averaging. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 86-99. doi:10.3758/APP.72.1.86
7. Corbett, J. E., & Oriet, C. (2010). Statistical representation and the temporal allocation of attention: Mean size is rapidly extracted over attentionally-demanding conditions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. Crawford, L. E., Huttenlocher, J., & Engebretson, P. H. (2000). Category effects on estimates of stimuli: Perception or reconstruction? Psychological Science, 11, 280-284.
9. de Fockert, J. W., & Marchant, A. P. (2008). Attention modulates set representation by statistical properties. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 789-794. doi:10.3758/PP.70.5.789
10. Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2000). What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 345-352.
11. Joo, S. J., Shin, K., Chong, S. C., & Blake, R. (2009). On the nature of the stimulus information necessary for estimating mean size of visual arrays. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-12. doi:10.1167/9.9.7
12. Myczek, K., & Simons, D. J. (2008). Better than average: Alternatives to statistical summary representations for rapid judgments of average size. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 772-788. doi:10.3758/PP.70.5.772
13. Teghtsoonian, M. (1965). The judgment of size. The American Journal of Psychology, 78, 392-402. doi:10.2307/1420573
14. Whiting, B. F., & Oriet, C. (2010, June). How rapid is rapid averaging? Poster presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behavior and Cognitive Science, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
15. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9, 33-39. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00006