Statistical processing: Not so implausible after all

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1327-1334

  Sang, Chul Chong ^a   Sung, Jun Joo ^a   Emmanouil, Tatiana Aloi ^b   Treisman, Anne ^b  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

COGNITION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS;

EID: 55449083788     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.7.1327     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ARIELY, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12, 157-162.
2. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
3. CHONG, S. C., & TREISMAN, A. (2003). Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 43, 393-404.
4. CHONG, S. C., & TREISMAN, A. (2005a). Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1-13.
5. CHONG, S. C., & TREISMAN, A. (2005b). Statistical processing: Computing the average size in perceptual groups. Vision Research, 45, 891-900.
6. HOCK, H. S., PARK, C. L., & SCHÖNER, G. (2002). Self-organized pattern formation: Experimental dissection of motion detection and motion integration by variation of attentional spread. Vision Research, 42, 991-1003.
7. LI, F. F., VANRULLEN, R., KOCH, C., & PERONA, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9596-9601.
8. MYCZEK, K., & SIMONS, D. J. (2008). Better than average: Alternatives to statistical summary representations for rapid judgments of average size. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 772-778.
9. NAVON, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
10. OLIVA, A., & TORRALBA, A. (2006). Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Progress in Brain Research, 155, 23-36.
11. PELLI, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
12. POTTER, M. C., & FAULCONER, B. A. (1975). Time to understand pictures and words. Nature, 253, 437-438.
13. RENSINK, R. A., O'REGAN, J. K., & CLARK, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
14. THORPE, S., FIZE, D., & MARLOT, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522.
15. TREISMAN, A. [M.] (2006). How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual Cognition, 14, 411-443.
16. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
17. TREISMAN, A. [M.], & GORMICAN, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
18. TREISMAN, A. [M.], & SOUTHER, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285-310.
19. WOODWORTH, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.