Stakeholder conflict: A case study

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 199-210

  Abma, T A ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Conflict; Evaluation; Multiplicity; Negotiation; Pluralism; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040362716     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00006-9     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abma, T. A. (1994). Responsive evaluation, In conversation with its co-creators. USA, Summer.
2. Abma, T. A. (1996). Responsief evalueren: Discoursen, controversen en allianties in het postmoderne [Responsive evaluation, Discourses, controversies and alliances with/in the postmodern]. Delft: Eburon.
3. Abma, T. A. (1997a). Voices from the margins: Political and ethical dilemmas in evaluation. Canadian Review of Social Policy/Revue Canadienne de Politique Sociale, 39, 41-53.
4. Abma, T. A. (1997b). Sharing power - facing ambiguity. In: L. Mabry, Evaluation and the post-modern dilemma Advances in Program Evaluation, Vol. 3 (pp. 105-119). JAI Press.
5. Abma, T. A. (1998). Storytelling as inquiry in a mental hospital. Qualitative Health Research, 8(6), 821-838.
6. Chia, R. (1996). Metaphors and metaphorization in organizational analysis: thinking beyond the thinkable. In: D. Grant, & C. Oswick, Metaphor and organizations (pp. 127-146). London: Sage Publications.
7. Van Dijk, N. M. H. (1989). Een methodische strategie van organisatie-verandering. [A methodical strategy for organizational change]. Delft: Eburon.
8. van Dongen, H. (1991). Some notions on social integration and steering. In: R. In't Veld, L. Schaap, C. J. A. M. Termeer, & M. J. W. en van Twist, Autopoiesis and configuration theory: new approaches to societal steering (pp. 47-54). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. van Dongen, H. J., de Laat, W. A. M., & Maas, A. J. J. A. (1996). Een kwestie van verschil, Conflicthantering en onderhandeling in een configuratie integratietheorie. [A matter of difference, Conflict management and negotiation in a configuration theory]. Delft: Eburon.
10. Dongen, A. (1997). Culture as method. Delft: Eburon.
11. Ellinor, L., & Gerard, G. (1998). Dialogue: rediscovering the transforming power of conversation. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
12. Fine, M. (1994). Working the hyphens: reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In: N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70-82). Thousand Oakes: Sage.
13. Fine, N., & Macbeth, F. (1996). Playing with fire, the creative use of conflict. In: M. Liebermann, Arts approaches to conflict (pp. 36-67). London and Bristol, Pennsylvania: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
14. Gergen, K. (1991). The saturated self: dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic books.
15. Gergen, K. J. (1992). Organization theory in the postmodern era. In: M. Reed, & M. Hughes, Rethinking organization, new directions in organization theory and analysis (pp. 207-226). London: Sage Publications.
16. Gergen, K. J. (1994). The limits of pure critique. In: M. Billig, & M. W. Simons, After postmodernism: reconstructing ideology critique (pp. 58-78).
17. Gilligan, C. (1986). Remapping the moral domain: New images of the self in relationship. In: T. Heller, & M. Welberg D. Sosna, Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality and self in western thought (pp. 237-252).
18. Gobey, F. (1996). Conflict, knowledge and transformation, Three drama techniques. In: M. Liebermann, Arts approaches to conflict (pp. 26-35). London and Bristol, Pennsylvania: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
19. Greene, J. C. (1994). Qualitative program evaluation. In: N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications.
20. Greene, J. C. (1997). Participatory evolution. In: L. Mabry, Evaluation and the post-modern dilemma Advances in program evaluation, 3 (pp. 171-190). JAI Press.
21. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Heap, J. L. (1995). Constructionism in the rhetoric and practice of fourth generation evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(1), 51-61.
23. Kaminsky, A. (1998). Myth, meaning, multiplicity and metaphor, Abma, T. A., Narrative evaluation, Advances in Program Evaluation, JAI Press, Vol. 6, in press.
24. Kensen, S. (1999). Sturen op variatie [Managing on diversity], dissertation, Den Haag, VNG, in press.
25. Kolb, D. M., & Putnam, L. L. (1992). Introduction. The dialectics of disputing. In: D. M. Kolb, & J. M. Burtunek, Hidden conflict in organizations, uncovering behind-the-scenes disputes (pp. 1-31). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
26. Larson, C. L. (1991). Transforming management philosophy: beyond the illusion of change, Organizations in transition: Opportunities and challenges for evaluation. In: New directions for program evaluation, Vol. 49 (pp. 73-85). Jossey-Bass Inc.
27. Levine, L. (1994). Listening with spirit and the art of team dialogue. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 7(1), 61-73.
28. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous?, Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In: D. D. Williams, Naturalistic evaluation: New directions for program evaluation (pp. 73-84). San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Maas, A. J. J. A. (1991). Offering new possibilities of organizing social situations: Towards a posture of decentering and centering. In: R. In't Veld, L. Schaap, C. J. A. M. Termeer, & M. J. W. van Twist, Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering (pp. 55-65). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Melucci, A. (1996). The playing self, person and meaning in the planetary society. Cambridge University Press.
31. Rein, M. (1983). From policy to practice. New York: Sharpe Inc.
32. Rescher, N. (1993). Pluralism: Against the demand for consensus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. Stake, R. E. (1975). To evaluate an arts program. In: R. E. Stake, Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach (pp. 13-31). Colombus Ohio: Merill.
34. Voogt, A. A. (1991). Managing of social cognitive configurations in a multiple context. In: R. In't Veld, L. Schaap, C. J. A. M. Termeer, & M. J. W. van Twist, Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering (pp. 67-78). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.