A Postscript on Thinking about Dialogue

Evaluation

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 264-276

  Schwandt, Thomas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

instrumental and substantive approaches of dialogue; praxis; types of dialogue

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000355333     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/135638900100700210     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bryk, A. (ed.) (1983) Stakeholder-Based Evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation 17. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Fournier, D. M. (ed.) (1995) Reasoning in Evaluation: Inferential Links and Leaps, New Directions for Evaluation 68. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Fournier, D. M. and N. L. Smith (1993) ‘Clarifying the Merits of Argument in Evaluation Practice’, Evaluation and Program Planning16(4): 315–323.
4. Garrison, J. (1996) ‘A Deweyan Theory of Democratic Listening’, Educational Theory46(4): 429–451.
5. Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln (1989) Fourth-Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. House, E. R. and K. R. Howe (1999) Values in Evaluation and Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Jodalen, H. and A. J. Vetlesen (1997) Closeness: An Ethics. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
8. Michelfelder, D. P. and R. E. Palmer (1989) Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer–Derrida Debate. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
9. Misgeld, D. and G. Nicholson (eds) (1992) Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry and History: Applied Hermeneutics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
10. Noddings, N. (1984) Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Noddings, N. (1992) The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Nussbaum, M. C. (1997) Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Risser, J. (1997) Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
14. Schwandt, T. A. (1997a) ‘Evaluation as Practical Hermeneutics’, Evaluation3(1): 1–15.
15. Schwandt, T. A. (1997b) ‘The Landscape of Values in Evaluation: Charted Terrain and Unexplored Territory’, in D. J. Rog and D. Fournier (eds) Progress and Future Directions in Evaluation: Perspectives on Theory, Practice, and Methods, New Directions for Evaluation 76, pp. 25–39. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16. Scriven, M. (1980) The Logic of Evaluation. Inverness, CA: Edgepress.
17. Stake, R. E. (1975) Evaluating the Arts in Education: A Responsive Approach. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
18. Taylor, C. (1989) The Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Taylor, C. (1991a) ‘The Dialogical Self’, in D. R. Hiley, J. F. Bohman and R. Shusterman (eds) The Interpretive Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20. Taylor, C. (1991b) The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Van Eemeren, F. H., R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds) (1987) Argumentation: Perspectives and Approaches. Dordrecht: Foris.
22. Walker, M. U. (1992) ‘Moral Understandings: Alternative “Epistemology” for a Feminist Ethics’, in E. Browning Cole and S. Coultrap-McQuin (eds) Explorations in Feminist Ethics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
23. Walton, D. N. (1989) Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Wolf, R. (1979) ‘The Use of Judicial Evaluation Methods in the Formation of Educational Policy’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis1: 19–28.