In vitro-in vivo correlation

Pharmaceutical Product Development: In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 107-123

  Modi, Nishit B ^a  

^a ALZA CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052859175     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Brockmeier D, Dengier HJ, Voegele D. In vitro-in vivo correlation of dissolution, a time scaling problem? Transformation of in vitro results to the in vivo situation, using theophylline as a practical example. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1985; 28(3): 291-300.
2. Chan KK, Langenbucher F, Gibaldi M. Evaluation of in vivo drug release by numerical deconvolution using oral solution data as the weighting function. J Pharm Sci 1987; 76(6):446-450.
3. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Extended release solid dosage forms: development, evaluation and application of in vitro/in vivo correlations. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Guidance for the Industry. Sep 1997.
4. The United States Pharmacopeia. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of dosage forms. < 1088 > 23rd ed. Rockville: U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, 1995:1924-1929.
5. Uppoor RS, Marroum PJ. Regulatory considerations for oral extended release dosage forms and in vitro (dissolution)/in vivo (bioavailability) correlations. In: Sahajwalla CH, ed. New Drug Development. Regulatory paradigms for clinical pharmacology and biopharmaceutics. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2004:417-448.
6. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). SUPAC-MR: modified release solid dosage forms. Scale-up and postapproval changes: chemistry, manufacturing, and controls; In Vitro dissolution testing and in vivo bioequivalence documentation. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Sep 1997.
7. Dunne A, O'Hare T, Devane J. Level A in vivo-in vitro correlation: nonlinear models and statistical methodology. J Pharm Sci 1997; 86(11):1245-1249.
8. Modi NB, Lam, A, Lindemulder E, Wang B, Gupta SK. Application of an in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) in setting formulation release specifications. Biopharm Drug Dispos 2000; 21(8):321-326.
9. Pitsiu M, Sathyan G, Gupta S, Verotta S. A semiparametric deconvolution model to establish in vivo-in vitro correlation applied to OROS® oxybutynin. J Pharm Sci 2001; 90(6):702-712.
10. O'Hara T, Hayes S, Davis J, Devane J, Smart T, Dunne A. In vivo-in vitro correlation (IVIVC) modeling incorporating a convolution step. J Pharmacokin Pharmacodyn 2001; 28(3):277-298.
11. Langenbucher F. Handling of computational in vitro/in vivo correlation problems by Microsoft Excel: I. Principles and some general algorithms. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2002; 53(1):1-7.
12. Langenbucher F. Handling of computational in vitro/in vivo correlation problems by Microsoft Excel: III. Convolution and deconvolution. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2003; 56(3):429-437.
13. Amidon GL, Lennernas H, Shah VP, Crison JR. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res 1995; 2(3):413-420.
14. Langenbucher F, Mysicka J. In vitro and in vivo deconvolution assessment of drug release kinetics from oxprenolol Oros preparations. Br J Clin Pharmac 1985; 19(suppl 2):151S-162S.
15. Hwang SS, Gorsline J, Louie J, Dye D, Guinta D, Hamel L. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a once-daily controlled-release pseudoephedrine product. J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 35(3):259-267.
16. Finkelstein A, McClean D, Kar S, et al. Local drug delivery via coronary stent with programmable release pharmacokinetics. Circulation 2003; 107(5):777-784.
17. Lincoff AM, Furst JG, Ellis SG, Tuch RJ, Topol EJ. Sustained local delivery of dexamethasone by a novel intravascular eluting stent to prevent restenosis in the porcine coronary injury model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29(4):808-816.
18. Wright JC, Leonard ST, Stevenson CL, et al. An in vivo/in vitro comparison with a leuprolide osmotic implant for the treatment of prostrate cancer. J Contr Rel 2001; 75(1-2):1-10.
19. Gupta SK, Southam M, Gale R, Hwang SS. System functionality and physicochemical model of fentanyl transdermal system. J Pain Symptom Manag 1992; 7(suppl 3): S17-S26.
20. Gupta SK, Bashaw ED, Hwang SS. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of transdermal products. In: Shah VP, Maiback HI, eds. Topical Drug Bioavailability, and Penetration. New York: Plenum Press, 1993:311-332.
21. Qi X, Liu R, Sun D, Ackermann C, Hou H. Convolution method to predict drug concentration profiles of 2,3,5,6-tetramethylpyrazine following transdermal application. Int J Pharm 2003; 259(1-2):39-45.
22. Murthy SN, Hiremath SR. Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of transdermal drug delivery systems of salbutamol sulfate. Int J Pharm 2004; 287(1-2):47-53.
23. Peschka R, Dennehy C, Szoka FC. A simple in vitro model to study the release kinetics of liposome encapsulated material. J Control Release 1998; 56(1-3):41-51.
24. Shabbits JA, Chiu GNC, Mayer LD. Development of an in vitro drug release assay that accurately predicts in vivo drug retention for liposomal-based drug delivery systems. J Control Release 2002; 84(3):161-170.
25. Smolen VF, Schoenwald RD. Drug-absorption analysis for pharmacological data I: method and confirmation exemplified for the mydriatic drug tropicamide. J Pharm Sci 1971; 60(1):96-103.
26. Smolen VF, Erb RJ. Predictive conversion of in vivo drug dissolution data into in vivo drug response versus time profiles exemplified for plasma levels of warfarin. J Pharm Sci 1977; 66(3):297-304.