Local jekyll and global hyde: The dual identity of face identification

Psychological Science

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1518-1526

  Miellet, Sébastien ^a,b   Caldara, Roberto ^b   Schyns, Philippe G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

eye movements; face identification; gaze contingent; iHybrid

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052858656     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797611424290     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Althoff R. R.,Cohen N. J.Eye-movement-based memory effect: A reprocessing effect in face perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1999;25:997-1010.
2. BlaisC.JackR. E.ScheepersC.FisetD.CaldaraR. (2008). Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLoS ONE, 3(8), e3022. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0003022.
3. Brainard D. H.The Psychophysics Toolbox.Spatial Vision. 1997;10:433-436.
4. Butler S.,Blais C.,Gosselin F.,Bub D.,Fiset D.Recognizing famous people.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2010;72:1444-1449.
5. Cabeza R.,Kato T.Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition.Psychological Science. 2000;11:429-433.
6. Caldara R.,Miellet S.iMap: A novel method for statistical fixation mapping of eye movement data.Behavior Research Methods. 2011;43:864-878.
7. CaldaraR.ZhouX.MielletS. (2010). Putting culture under the spotlight reveals universal information use for face recognition. PLoS ONE, 5(3), e9708. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0009708.
8. ChauvinA.WorsleyK. J.SchynsP. G.ArguinM.GosselinF. (2005). Accurate statistical tests for smooth classification images. Journal of Vision, 5(9), Article 1. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/5/9/1.
9. Cornelissen F. W.,Peters E. M.,Palmer J.The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 2002;34:613-617.
10. Dakin S. C.,Hess R. F.,Ledgeway T.,Achtman R. L.What causes nonmonotonic tuning of fMRI response to noisy images?.Current Biology. 2002;12:R476-R477.
11. Farah M. J.,Tanaka J. W.,Drain H. M.What causes the face inversion effect?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1995;21:628-634.
12. Gosselin F.,Schyns P. G.Bubbles: A new technique to reveal the use of visual information in recognition tasks.Vision Research. 2001;41:2261-2271.
13. Groner R.,Walder F.,Groner M. Looking at faces: Local and global aspects of scanpaths. Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movements research. Gale A. G.Johnson F., ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 1984:523-533.
14. Henderson J. M.,Williams C. C.,Falk R. J.Eye movements are functional during face learning.Memory & Cognition. 2005;33:98-106.
15. Hsiao J. H.-W.,Cottrell G.Two fixations suffice in face recognition.Psychological Science. 2008;19:998-1006.
16. Jack R. E.,Blais C.,Scheepers C.,Schyns P. G.,Caldara R.Cultural confusions show that facial expressions are not universal.Current Biology. 2009;19:1543-1548.
17. Kanwisher N.Domain specificity in face perception.Nature Neuroscience. 2000;3:759-763.
18. KellyD. J.MielletS.CaldaraR. (2010). Culture shapes eye movements for visually homogeneous objects. Frontiers in Psychology, 1. Retrieved from http://www.frontiersin.org/perception_science/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00006/full.
19. KitaY.GunjiA.SakiharaK.InagakiM.KagaM.NakagawaE.HosokawaT. (2010). Scanning strategies do not modulate face identification: Eye-tracking and near-infrared spectroscopy study. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e11050. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883577/.
20. Maurer D.,Le Grand R.,Mondloch C.The many faces of configural processing.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2002;6:255-260.
21. Oliva A.,Schyns P. G.Coarse blobs, or fine scale edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli.Cognitive Psychology. 1997;34:72-107.
22. Oliva A.,Torralba A.,Schyns P. G.Hybrid images.ACM Transactions on Graphics. 2006;25:527-532.
23. Rodger H.,Kelly D.,Blais C.,Caldara R.Inverting faces does not abolish cultural diversity in eye movements.Perception. 2010;39:1491-1503.
24. Schyns P. G.,Bonnar L.,Gosselin F.Show me the features: Understanding recognition from the use of visual information.Psychological Science. 2002;13:402-409.
25. Schyns P. G.,Oliva A.From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition.Psychological Science. 1994;5:195-200.
26. Schyns P. G.,Oliva A.Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: When categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations.Cognition. 1999;69:243-265.
27. Schyns P. G.,Petro L.,Smith M. L.Dynamics of visual information integration in the brain to categorize facial expressions.Current Biology. 2007;17:1580-1585.
28. SchynsP. G.PetroL.SmithM. L. (2009). Transmission of facial expressions co-evolved with their efficient decoding in the brain: Behavioral and brain evidence. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5625. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0005625.
29. Sekuler A. B.,Gaspar C. M.,Gold J. M.,Bennett P. J.Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.Current Biology. 2004;14:391-396.
30. Sergent J.An investigation into component and configurational processes underlying face recognition.British Journal of Psychology. 1984;75:221-242.
31. SimoncelliE. P. (1997). Image and multi-scale pyramid tools [Computer software]. Retrieved from www.cns.nyu.edu/~eero/software.html.
32. Tanaka J. W.,Farah M. J.Parts and wholes in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A. 1993;46:225-245.
33. Taschereau-DumouchelV.RossionB.SchynsP. G.GosselinF. (2010). Interattribute distances do not represent the identity of real-world faces. Frontiers in Perception Science, 1. Retrieved from http://www.frontiersin.org/perception_science/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00159/full.
34. van RijsbergenN. J.SchynsP. G. (2010). Dynamics of trimming the content of face representations for categorization in the brain. PLoS Computational Biology, 5(11), e1000561. Retrieved from http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1000561.
35. Watson A. B.,Pelli D. G.QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.Perception & Psychophysics. 1983;33:113-120.
36. Yarbus A. L.Eye movements and vision. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1967:.