Interattribute distances do not represent the identity of real-world faces

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn , Issue OCT, 2010, Pages

  Taschereau Dumouchel, Vincent ^a   Rossion, Bruno ^b   Schyns, Philippe G ^c   Gosselin, Frédéric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Face recognition; Interattribute distances

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957597273     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00159     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barton, J. J., Keenan, J. P., and Bass, T. (2001). Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: effects of inversion and viewing duration. Br. J. Psychol. 92, 527-549.
2. Bhatt, R. S., Bertin, E., Hayden, A., and Reed, A. (2005). Face processing in infancy: developmental changes in the use of different kinds of relational information. Child Dev. 76, 169-181.
3. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vision 10, 433-436.
4. Caharel, S., Fiori, N., Bernard, C., Lalonde, B., and Rebaï, M. (2006). The effect of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 62, 141-151.
5. Carey, S. (1992). Becoming a face expert. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 335, 95-103.
6. Diamond, R., and Carey, S. (1977). Developmental changes in the representation of faces. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 23, 1-22.
7. Diamond, R., and Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 115, 107-117.
8. Dupuis-Roy, N., Fortin, I., Fiset, D., and Gosselin, F. (2009). Uncovering gender discrimination cues in a realistic setting. J. Vision 9, 1-8.
9. Ekman, P., and Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Clues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Farah, M. J., Tanaka, J. W., and Drain, H. M. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 628-634.
11. Farkas, L. G. (1981). Anthropometry of the Head and the Face. New York: Elsevier.
12. Freire, A., Lee, K., and Symons, L. A. (2000). The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence. Perception 29, 159-170.
13. Goffaux, V. (2008). The horizontal and vertical relations in upright faces are transmitted by different spatial frequency ranges. Acta Psychol. 128, 119-126.
14. Goffaux, V., Hault, B., Michel, C., Vuong, Q. C., and Rossion, B. (2005). The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces. Perception 34, 77-86.
15. Goffaux, V., and Rossion, B. (2007). Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 33, 995-1002.
16. Gonzalez, R. C., Woods, R. E., and Eddins, S. L. (2009). Digital Image ProcessingUsing MATLAB, Second Edition. Gatesmark Publishing.
17. Haig, N. D. (1984). The effect of feature displacement on face recognition. Perception 13, 502-512.
18. Hayden, A., Bhatt, R. S., Reed, A., Corbly, C. R., and Joseph, J. E. (2007). The development of expert face processing: are infants sensitive to normal differences in second-order relational information? J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 97, 85-98.
19. Hochberg, J., and Galper, R. (1967). Recognition of faces: I. An exploratory study. Psychon. Sci. 9, 619-620.
20. Hosie, J. A., Ellis, H. D., and Haig, N. D. (1988). The effect of feature displacement on perception of well known faces. Perception 17, 461-474.
21. Keys, R. (1981). Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 29, 1153.
22. Leder, H., and Bruce, V. (1998). Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 51, 449-473.
23. Leder, H., and Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 53, 513-536.
24. Leder, H., and Carbon, C. C. (2006). Face-specific configural processing of relational information. Br. J. Psychol. 97, 19-29.
25. Leder, L., Candrian, G., Huber, O., and Bruce, V. (2001). Configural information in the context of upright and inverted faces. Perception 30, 73-83.
26. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D., and Brent, H. P. (2001). Early visual experience and face processing. Nature 410, 890 (Correction: Nature 412, 786).
27. Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., and Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 255-260.
28. Mondloch, C. J., Geldart, S., Maurer, D., and Le Grand, R. (2003). Developmental changes in face processing skills. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 86, 67-84.
29. Mondloch, C. J., Le Grand, R., and Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception 31, 553-566.
30. Okada, K., von der Malsburg, C., and Akamatsu, S. (1999). "A pose-invariant face recognition system using linear PCMAP model," in Proceedings of IEICE Workshop of Human Information Processing (HIP99-48), November 1999, Okinawa, 7-12.
31. O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., and Blanz, V. (1999). Two-dimensional reflectance and three-dimensional shape contributions to recognition of faces across viewpoint. Vision Res. 39, 3145-3155.
32. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics:transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vision 10, 437-442.
33. Rhodes, G. (1988). Looking at faces - 1st order and 2nd order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception 17, 43-63.
34. Rhodes, G., Brake, S., and Atkinson, A. P. (1993). What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition 47, 25-57.
35. Rhodes, G., Hayward, W. G., and Winkler, C. (2007). Expert face coding: configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 499-505.
36. Robbins, R., and McKone, E. (2006). No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition 103, 34-79.
37. Rossion, B. (2008). Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychol. 128, 274-289.
38. Rossion, B. (2009). Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: the perceptual field hypothesis. Acta Psychol. 132, 300-312.
39. Schyns, P. G., and Oliva, A. (1999). Dr Angry and Mr Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations. Cognition 69, 243-265.
40. Sergent, J. (1984). An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. Br. J. Psychol. 75, 221-242.
41. Tanaka, J. W., and Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 46, 225-245.
42. Tanaka, J. W., and Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Mem. Cogn. 25, 583-592.
43. Tjan, B. S., Braje, W. L., Legge, G. E., and Kersten, D. (1995). Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise. Vision Res. 35, 3053-3069.
44. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: an approach to object recognition. Cognition 32, 193-254.
45. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. J. Exp. Psychol. 81, 141-145.
46. Young, A. M., Hellawell, D., and Hay, D. C. (1987). Configural information in face perception. Perception 10, 747-759.