Hybrid images

ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Papers, SIGGRAPH '06

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 527-532

  Oliva, Aude ^a   Torralba, Antonio ^b   Schyns, Philippe G ^c  

^a MIT BCS   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

human perception; hybrid images; scale space

Indexed keywords

FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; HUMAN PERCEPTION; HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEM; HYBRID IMAGE; MULTISCALE PROCESSING; PERCEPTUAL GROUPING; SCALE SPACES; STATIC IMAGES; VIEWING DISTANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 77953972548     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1179352.1141919     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. BURT, D. C., AND ADELSON, E. H. 1983. The laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Transaction on Communications 31, 532-540.
2. DALI, S. 1996. The Salvador Dali Museum Collection. Bulfinch Press.
3. HUGHES, H. C., NOZAWA, G., AND KITTERLE, F. 1996. Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistics of natural images. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8, 197-230.
4. LINDEBERG, T. 1993. Detecting salient blob-like images structures and their spatial scales with a scale-space primal sketch: a method for focus of attention. Int. J. Comp. Vis 11, 283-318.
5. LIVINGSTONE, M. S. 2000. Is it warm? is it real? or just low spatial frequency? Science 290, 5495, 1299.
6. MAJAJ, N., PELLI, D., KURSHAN, P., AND PALOMARES, M. 2002. The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Research 42, 1165-1184. (Pubitemid 34454938)
7. NAVON, D. 1977. Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive psychology 9, 353-383.
8. OLIVA, A., AND SCHYNS, P. 1997. Coarse blobs or fine edges? evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive psychology 34, 1, 72-107.
9. PARKER, D., LISHMAN, J., AND HUGHES, J. 1992. Temporal integration of spatially filtered visual images. Perception 21, 147-160.
10. PARKER, D., LISHMAN, J., AND HUGHES, J. 1996. Role of coarse and fine information in face and object processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22, 1448-1466.
11. PORTILLA, J., AND SIMONCELLI, E. 2000. A parametric texture model based on joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients. Int. J. Comp. Vis 40, 49-71.
12. POTTER, M. 1975. Meaning in visual scenes. Science 187, 965-966.
13. SCHYNS, P., AND OLIVA, A. 1994. From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science 5, 195-200.
14. SCHYNS, P., AND OLIVA, A. 1999. Dr. angry and mr. smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations. Cognition 69, 243-265.
15. SETLUR, V., AND GOOCH, B. 2004. Is that a smile?: gaze dependent facial expressions. In NPAR '04: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on Non-photorealistic animation and rendering, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 79-151.
16. SILVERS, R. 1997. Photomosaics. Henry Holt and Company, Inc.
17. SOLOMON, J., AND PELLI, A. 1994. The visual filter mediating letter identification recognition. Nature 369, 395-397.
18. SUGASE, Y., YAMANE, S., UENO, S., AND KAWANO, K. 1999. Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex. Nature 400, 869-873.
19. WATT, R. 1987. Scanning from coarse to fine spatial scales in the human visual system after onset of a stimulus. J. Opt.Soc.Am: A, 4, 2006-2021.