The effects of plant size and light availability on male and female reproductive success and functional gender in a hermaphrodite tree species, Magnolia stellata

Botany

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 593-604

  Setsuko, Suzuki ^a,b   Tomaru, Nobuhiro ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Entomophilous; Geitonogamy; Inbreeding depression; Molecular markers; Parentage analysis; Protogynous; Selfing rate

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS; CHLOROPLAST; DIAMETER; ENTOMOPHILY; EVERGREEN TREE; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; GEITONOGAMY; GENET; GENETIC MARKER; HERMAPHRODITE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; LIGHT AVAILABILITY; METAPOPULATION; PARENTAGE; PHOTON FLUX DENSITY; PLANT ARCHITECTURE; POLLEN; PROTOGYNY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEEDLING EMERGENCE; SIZE;

HEXAPODA; MAGNOLIA STELLATA; MAGNOLIACEAE;

EID: 80052838774     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/b11-051     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adams, W.T., and Birkes, D.S. 1991. Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. In Biochemical markers in the population genetics of forest trees. Edited by S. Fineschi, M.E. Malvolti, F. Cannata, and H.H. Hattemer. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, the Netherlands. pp. 157-172.
2. Bateman, A.J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2(3): 349-368. doi:10.1038/hdy.1948.21. PMID:18103134.
3. Bickel, A.M., and Freeman, D.C. 1993. Effects of pollen vector and plant geometry on floral sex ratio in monoecious plants. Am. Midl. Nat. 130(2): 239-247. doi:10.2307/2426124.
4. Broyles, S.B., and Wyatt, R. 1990. Paternity analysis in a naturalpopulation of Asclepias exalata multiple paternity, functional gender, and the pollen-donation hypothesis. Evolution, 44(6): 1454-1468. doi:10.2307/2409329.
5. Campbell, D.R. 1998. Variation in lifetime male fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata: tests of sex allocation theory. Am. Nat. 152(3): 338-353. doi:10.1086/286173. PMID:18811443.
6. Campbell, D.R. 2000. Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15(6): 227-232. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01872-3. PMID:10802547.
7. Charnov, E.L. (Editor). 1982. Labile sexuality (sex choice) in plants. In The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. pp. 202-205.
8. Charpentier, A. 2002. Consequences of clonal growth for plant mating. Evol. Ecol. 15(4-6): 521-530. doi:10.1023/A:1016057503722.
9. Chase, M.R., Moller, C., Kesseli, R., and Bawa, K.S. 1996. Distant gene flow in tropical trees. Nature (Lond.), 383(6599): 398-399. doi:10.1038/383398a0.
10. Clark, R.B., and Orton, E.R. 1967. Sex ratio in Ilex opaca Ait. HortSci, 2: 115.
11. Corral-Aguirre, J., and Sánchez-Velásquez, L.R. 2006. Seed ecology and germination treatments in Magnolia dealbata: an endangered species. Flora Morphology, Distribution and Functional Ecology of Plants, 201(3): 227-232. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2005.07.004.
12. Cruzan, M.B., Hamrick, J.L., Arnold, M.L., and Bennett, B.D. 1994. Mating system variation in hybridizing irises: effects of phenology and floral densities on family outcrossing rates. Heredity, 72(1): 95-105. doi:10.1038/hdy.1994.12.
13. de Jong, T.J., Waser, N.M., Price, M.V., and Ring, R.M. 1992. Plant size, geitonogamy and seed set in Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia (Berl.), 89: 310-315.
14. Delesalle, V.A., and Mazer, S.J. 2009. Size-dependent pollen:ovule ratios and the allometry of floral sex allocation in Clarkia (Onagraceae) taxa with contrasting mating systems. Am. J. Bot. 96(5): 968-978. doi:10.3732/ajb.0800039. PMID:21628249.
15. Devlin, B., and Ellstrand, N.C. 1990. Male and female fertility variation in wild radish, a hermaphrodite. Am. Nat. 136(1): 87-107. doi:10.1086/285083.
16. Dodson, C.H. 1962. Pollination and variation in the Subtribe Catasetinae (Orchidaceae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 49(1/2): 35-56. doi:10.2307/2394740.
17. Elle, E., and Meagher, T.R. 2000. Sex allocation and reproductive success in the andromonoecious perennial Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae). II. Paternity and functional gender. Am. Nat. 156(6): 622-636. doi:10.1086/316997.
18. Freeman, D., Harper, K., and Charnov, E. 1980. Sex change in plants: old and new observations and new hypotheses. Oecologia (Berl.), 47(2): 222-232. doi:10.1007/BF00346825.
19. Freeman, D.C., McArthur, E.D., Harper, K.T., and Blauer, A.C. 1981. Influence of environment on the floral sex ratio of monoecious plants. Evolution, 35(1): 194-197. doi:10.2307/ 2407956.
20. Freeman, D.C., McArthur, E.D., and Harper, K.T. 1984. The adaptive significance of sexual labilityin plants using Atriplex cabescens as a principal example. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 71(1): 265-277. doi:10. 2307/2399070.
21. Godoy, J.A., and Jordano, P. 2001. Seed dispersal by animals: Exact identification of source trees with endocarp DNA microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 10(9): 2275-2283. doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001. 01342.x. PMID:11555269.
22. Goudet, J. 2002. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3.2). Available from http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm [accessed 27 October 2006].
23. Gregorius, H.R. 1982. Selection in plant populations of effectively infinite size II. Protectedness of a biallelic polymorphism. J. Theor. Biol. 96(4): 689-705. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(82)90237-5.
24. Grivet, D., Smouse, P.E., and Sork, V.L. 2005. A novel approach to an old problem: tracking dispersed seeds. Mol. Ecol. 14(11): 3585-3595. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02680.x. PMID: 16156825.
25. Harder, L.D., and Barrett, S.C.H. 1995. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrosite plants. Nature (Lond.), 373(6514): 512-515. doi:10.1038/373512a0.
26. Hartnett, D. 1990. Size-dependent allocation to sexual and vegetative reproduction in four clonal composites. Oecologia (Berl.), 84(2): 254-259.
27. Heslop-Harrison, J. 1957. The experimental modification of sex expression in flowering plants. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 32(1): 38-90. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1957.tb01576.x.
28. Hirayama, K., Ishida, K., and Tomaru, N. 2005. Effects of pollen shortage and self-pollination on seed production of an endangered tree, Magnolia stellata. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 95(6): 1009-1015. doi:10.1093/aob/mci107. PMID:15753118.
29. Hirayama, K., Ishida, K., Setsuko, S., and Tomaru, N. 2007. Reduced seed production, inbreeding, and pollen shortage in a small population of a threatened tree, Magnolia stellata. Biol. Conserv. 136(2): 315-323. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.12.004.
30. Holtsford, T.P., and Ellstrand, N.C. 1992. Genetic and environmental variation in floral traits affecting outcrossing rate in Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). Evolution, 46(1): 216-225. doi:10. 2307/2409816.
31. Isagi, Y., Kanazashi, T., Suzuki, W., Tanaka, H., and Abe, T. 1999. Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers for Magnolia obovata Thunb., and their utility in related species. Mol. Ecol. 8(4): 698-700. PMID:10327668. Published by NRC Research Press
32. Isagi, Y., Kanazashi, T., Suzuki, W., Tanaka, H., and Abe, T. 2000. Microsatellite analysis of the regeneration process of Magnolia obovata Thunb. Heredity, 84(2): 143-151. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00642.x. PMID:10762383.
33. Isagi, Y., Kanazashi, T., Suzuki, W., Tanaka, H., and Abe, T. 2004. Highly variable pollination patterns in Magnolia obovata revealed by microsatellite paternity analysis. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165(6): 1047-1053. doi:10.1086/423883.
34. Isagi, Y., Saito, D., Kawaguchi, H., Tateno, R., and Watanabe, S. 2007. Effective pollen dispersal is enhanced by the genetic structure of an Aesculus turbinata population. J. Ecol. 95(5): 983-990. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01272.x.
35. Ishii, H.S. 2004. Increase of male reproductive components with size in an animal-pollinated hermaphrodite, Narthecium asiaticum (Liliaceae). Funct. Ecol. 18(1): 130-137. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2004.00826.x.
36. Jones, F.A., Chen, J., Weng, G.J., and Hubbell, S.P. 2005. A genetic evaluation of seed dispersal in the neotropical tree Jacaranda copaia (Bignoniaceae). Am. Nat. 166(5): 543-555. doi:10.1086/ 491661. PMID:16224720.
37. Kalinowski, S.T., Taper, M.L., and Marshall, T.C. 2007. Revising how the computer program Cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 16(5): 1099-1106. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x. PMID:17305863
38. Kilkenny, F.F., and Galloway, L.F. 2008. Reproductive success in varying light environments: direct and indirect effects of light on plants and pollinators. Oecologia (Berl.), 155(2): 247-255. doi:10. 1007/s00442-007-0903-z. PMID:18278516.
39. Kisanuki, H., Oguro, H., Nakai, A., Setsuko, S., Nishimura, N., and Tomaru, N. 2008. The soil seed bank of the threatened plant Magnolia stellata is subordinate to the emergence of current-year seedlings. J. For. Res. 13(2): 143-146. doi:10.1007/s10310-008-0066-8.
40. Klinkhamer, P.G.L., and de Jong, T.J. 1993. Attractiveness to pollinators: a plant's dilemma. Oikos, 66(1): 180-184. doi:10. 2307/3545212.
41. Klinkhamer, P.G.L., de Jong, T.J., and Metz, H. 1997. Sex and size in cosexual plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12(7): 260-265. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01078-1. PMID:21238063.
42. Latta, R.G., Linhart, Y.B., Fleck, D., and Elliot, M. 1998. Direct and indirect estimates of seed versus pollen movement within a population of ponderosa pine. Evolution, 52(1): 61-67. doi:10. 2307/2410920.
43. Lian, C., Goto, S., Kubo, T., Takahashi, Y., Nakagawa, M., and Hogetsu, T. 2008. Nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite analysis of Abies sachalinensis regeneration on fallen logs in a subboreal forest in Hokkaido, Japan. Mol. Ecol. 17(12): 2948-2962. doi:10. 1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03802.x. PMID:18489547.
44. Liao, W.J., Hu, Y., Zhu, B.R., Zhao, X.Q., Zeng, Y.F., and Zhang, D. Y. 2009. Female reproductive success decreases with display size in monkshood, Aconitum kusnezoffii (Ranunculaceae). Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 104(7): 1405-1412. doi:10.1093/aob/mcp237. PMID: 19767308.
45. Lloyd, D.G. 1980. Sexual strategies in plants. III. A quantitative method for describing the gender of plants. N.Z. J. Bot. 18: 103-108.
46. Lloyd, D.G., and Bawa, K.S. 1984. Modification of the gender of seed plants in varying conditions. Evol. Biol. 17: 255-338
47. Matzke, E.B. 1938. Inflorescence patterns and sexual expression in Begonia semperflorens. Am. J. Bot. 25(7): 465-478. doi:10.2307/ 2436672.
48. Meagher, T.R. 1986. Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. 1. Identification of most-likely male parents. Am. Nat. 128(2): 199-215. doi:10.1086/284554
49. Méndez, M., and Obeso, J. 1993. Size-dependent reproductive and vegetative allocation in Arum italicum (Araceae). Can. J. Bot. 71(2): 309-314. doi:10.1139/b93-032.
50. Ministry of the Environment of Japan Government of Japan. 2007. Red list (Plant I) vascular plants Ministry of the Environment, Tokyo, Japan. Available from http://www.env.go.jp/press/file_view.php?serial=9947&hou_id=8648 [accessed 3 August 2007]. [In Japanese.]
51. Mizui, N. 1990. Seed viability of deciduous broad-leaved tree species during two-year storage in a forest soil. Trans Mtg Hokkaido Br Jpn For Soc, 38 38-40. [In Japanese.]
52. Mori, Y., Nagamitsu, T., and Kubo, T. 2009. Clonal growth and its effects on male and female reproductive success in Prunus ssiori (Rosaceae). Popul. Ecol. 51(1): 175-186. doi:10.1007/s10144-008-0099-z.
53. Murray, M.G., and Thompson, W.F. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 8(19): 4321-4326. doi:10.1093/nar/8.19.4321. PMID:7433111.
54. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.
55. Nei, M., and Tajima, F. 1981. DNA polymorphism detectable by restriction endonucleases. Genetics, 97(1): 145-163. PMID: 6266912.
56. Nooteboom, H.P. 1994. Proposals to reject Magnolia tomentosa (Thymelaeaceae) and conserve Magnolia kobus (Magnoliaceae) with a conserved type. Taxon, 43(3): 467-468. doi:10.2307/ 1222726.
57. R Development Core Team. 2003. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available from http://www.r-project.org/[accessed 24 December 2006].
58. Routley, M.B., Kron, P., and Husband, B.C. 2004. The consequences of clone size for paternal and maternal success in domestic apple (Malus X Domestica). Am. J. Bot. 91(9): 1326-1332. doi:10.3732/ ajb.91.9.1326. PMID:21652365.
59. Sargent, S. 1990. Neighborhood effects on fruit removal by birds: A field experiment with Viburnum dentatum (Caprifoliaceae). Ecology, 71(4): 1289-1298. doi:10.2307/1938266.
60. Schoen, D.J., and Stewart, S.C. 1986. Variation in male reproductive investment and male reproductive success in white spruce. Evolution, 40(6): 1109-1120. doi:10.2307/2408940
61. Setsuko, S., Ishida, K., and Tomaru, N. 2004. Size distribution and genetic structure in relation to clonal growth within a population of Magnolia tomentosa Thunb. (Magnoliaceae). Mol. Ecol. 13(9): 2645-2653. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004. 02271.x. PMID:15315677.
62. Setsuko, S., Ueno, S., Tsumura, Y., and Tomaru, N. 2005. Development of microsatellite markers in Magnolia stellata (Magnoliaceae), a threatened Japanese tree. Conserv. Genet. 6(2): 317-320. doi:10.1007/s10592-004-7826-6.
63. Setsuko, S., Ishida, K., Ueno, S., Tsumura, Y., and Tomaru, N. 2007. Population differentiation and gene flow within a metapopulation of a threatened tree, Magnolia stellata (Magnoliaceae). Am. J. Bot. 94(1): 128-136. doi:10.3732/ajb.94.1.128. PMID:21642215.
64. Setsuko, S., Tamaki, I., Ishida, K., and Tomaru, N. 2008. Relationships between flowering phenology and female reproductive success in the Japanese tree species Magnolia stellata. Botany, 86(3): 248-258. doi:10.1139/B07-135.
65. Smouse, P.E., Meagher, T.R., and Kobak, C.J. 1999. Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae): why do some males have higher reproductive contributions? J. Evol. Biol. 12(6): 1069-1077. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00114.x.
66. Tamaki, I., Ishida, K., Setsuko, S., and Tomaru, N. 2009. Interpopulation variation in mating system and late-stage inbreeding depression in Magnolia stellata. Mol. Ecol. 18(11): 2365-2374. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04195.x. PMID:19457207. Published by NRC Research Press
67. Teixeira, S., and Bernasconi, G. 2007. High prevalence of multiple paternity within fruits in natural populations of Silene latifolia, as revealed by microsatellite DNA analysis. Mol. Ecol. 16(20): 4370-4379. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03493.x. PMID:17784922
68. Ueda, K. 1986. A nomenclatural revision of the Japanese Magnolia species (Magnoliaceae), together with two long-cultivated Chinese species. II. M. tomentosa and M. praecocissima. Taxon, 35(2): 344-347. doi:10.2307/1221288.
69. Ueno, S., Setsuko, S., Kawahara, T., and Yoshimaru, H. 2005. Genetic diversity and differentiation of the endangered Japanese endemic tree Magnolia stellata using nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers. Conserv. Genet. 6(4): 563-574. doi:10. 1007/s10592-005-9011-y.
70. Vallejo-Marín, M., Dorken, M.E., and Barrett, S.C.H. 2010. The ecological and evolutionary consequences of clonality for plant mating. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 41(1): 193-213. doi:10.1146/ annurev.ecolsys.110308.120258.
71. Vrieling, K., Saumitou-Laprade, P., Cuguen, J., van Dijk, H., de Jong, T.J., and Klinkhamer, P.G.L. 1999. Direct and indirect estimates of the selfing rate in small and large individuals of the bumblebee pollinated Cynoglossum officinale L (Boraginaceae). Ecol. Lett. 2(5): 331-337. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00093.x
72. Wilson, P., Thomson, J.D., Stanton, M.L., and Rigney, L.P. 1994. Beyond floral Batemania -gender biases in selection for pollination success. Am. Nat. 143(2): 283-296. doi:10.1086/ 285604. Published by NRC Research Press