Increase of male reproductive components with size in an animal-pollinated hermaphrodite, Narthecium asiaticum (Liliaceae)

Functional Ecology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 130-137

  Ishii, H S ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Animal pollinated plant; Male reproductive components; Size dependent sex allocation

Indexed keywords

GEITONOGAMY; HERMAPHRODITE; POLLINATION; SEX ALLOCATION; SIZE EFFECT; ZOOPHILY;

ANIMALIA; LILIACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; NARTHECIUM; NARTHECIUM ASIATICUM;

EID: 1342290121     PISSN: 02698463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2004.00826.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ackerly, D.D. & Jasienski, M. (1990) Size-dependent variation of gender in high density stands of the monoecious annual, Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae). Oecologia 82, 474-477.
2. Andersson, S. (1988) Size-dependent pollination efficiency in Anchusa officinalis (Boraginaceae): cause and consequences. Oecologia 76, 125-130.
3. Ashman, T.L. & Hitchens, M.S. (2000) Dissecting the causes of variation in intra-inflorescence allocation in a sexually polymorphic species, Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 87, 197-204.
4. Ashman, T.L., Pacyna, J., Diefenderfer, C. & Leftwich, T. (2001) Size-dependent sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: the effects of sex morph and inflorescence architecture. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162, 327-334.
5. Bickel, A.M. & Freeman, D.C. (1993) Effect of pollen vector and plant geometry on floral sex ratio in monoecious plants. American Midland Naturalist 130, 239-247.
6. Brunet, J. (1992) Sex allocation in hermaphroditic plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7, 79-84.
7. Brunet, J. (1996) Male reproductive success and variation in fruil and seed set in Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae). Ecology 77, 2458-2471.
8. Burd, M. & Allen, T.F.H. (1988) Sexual allocation strategy in wind-pollinated plants. Evolution 42, 403-407.
9. Damgaard, C. & Loeschcke, V. (1994) Genotypic variation for reproductive characters, and the influence of pollen-ovule ratio on selfing rate in rape seed (Brassica napus). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 7, 599-607.
10. Harder, L.D. & Barrett, S.C.H. (1995) Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373, 512-515.
11. Ishii, H.S. & Sakai, S. (2001) Effects of display size and position on individual floral longevily in racemes of Narthecium asiaticum (Liliaceae). Functional Ecology 15, 396-405.
12. Ishii, H.S. & Sakai, S. (2002) Temporal variation in floral display size and individual floral sex allocation in racemes of Narthecium asiaticum (Liliaceae). American Journal of Botany 89, 441-446.
13. de Jong, T.J. (2000) From pollen dynamics to adaptive dynamics. Plant Species Biology 15, 31-41.
14. de Jong, T.J. & Klinkhamer, P.G.L. (1994) Plant size and reproductive success through female and male function. Journal of Ecology 82, 399-402.
15. Klinkhamer, P.G.L., de Jong, T.J. & Nell, H.W. (1994) Limiting factors for seed production and phenotypic gender in the gynodioecious species Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Oikos 71, 469-478.
16. Klinkhamer, P.G.L., de Jong, T.J. & Metz, H. (1997) Sex and size in cosexual plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12, 260-265.
17. Kudo, G. & Maeda, T. (1998) Size-dependent variation of phenotypic gender and functional gender of a spring ephemeral, Anemone debilis Fisch. Plant Species Biology 13, 69-76.
18. Kudo, G., Maeda, T. & Narita, K. (2001) Variation in floral sex allocation and reproductive success within inflorescences of Corydalis ambigua (Fumariaceae): pollination efficiency or resource limitation? Journal of Ecology 89, 48-56.
19. Lloyd, D.G. & Bawa, K.S. (1984) Modification of the gender of seed plants in varying conditions. Evolutionary Biology 17, 225-388.
20. Lundholm, J.T. & Aarssen, L.D. (1993) Neighbour effects on gender variation in Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Canadian Journal of Botany 72, 794-800.
21. Mazer, S.J. & Dawson, K.L. (2001) Size-dependent sex allocation within flowers of the annual herb Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae): ontogenetic and among-plant variation. American Journal of Botany 88, 819-831.
22. Mitchell, R. J. ( 1994) Effects of floral traits, pollinator visitation, and plant size on Ipomopsis aggregata fruit production. American Naturalist 143, 870-889.
23. Peakall, R. & Handel, S.N. (1993) Pollinators discriminate among floral heights of a sexually deceptive orchid: ampliations for selection. Evolution 47, 1681-1687.
24. Rademaker, M.C.J. & de Jong, T.J. (1999) The shape of the fitness curve for Cynoglossum officinale: quantifying sees dispersal and seedling survival in the field. Plant Biology 1, 351-356.
25. Thomson, J.D. & Brunet, J. (1990) Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5, 11-16.
26. Wright, S.I. & Barrett, S.C.H. (1998) Size-dependent gender modification in a hermaphroditic perennial herb. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 266, 225-232.