Effects of pollen shortage and self-pollination on seed production of an endangered tree, Magnolia stellata

Annals of Botany

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1009-1015

  Hirayama, Kimiko ^a   Ishida, Kiyoshi ^a   Tomaru, Nobuhiro ^b  

^a FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Fruit set; Inbreeding depression; Magnolia stellata; Microsatellite analyses; Outcrossing rate; Ovule survival rate; Pollen limitation; Pollen shortage; Pollination; Primary selfing rate; Seed set; Self pollination

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; FRUIT SET; OUTCROSSING; POLLEN LIMITATION; POLLINATION; SEED PRODUCTION;

ANIMALIA; COLEOPTERA; INSECTA; MAGNOLIA STELLATA; MAGNOLIACEAE;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; JAPAN; MAGNOLIACEAE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; REPRODUCTION; TREE;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; JAPAN; MAGNOLIA; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; SEEDS; TREES;

EID: 21244480189     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci107     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Barrett SCH. 1998. The evolution of mating strategies in flowering plants. Trends in Plant Science 9: 335-341.
2. Bateman AJ. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349-368.
3. Bernhardt P, Thien LB. 1987. Self-isolation and insect pollination in the primitive angiosperms: new evaluations of older hypotheses. Plant Systematics and Evolution 156: 159-176.
4. Burd M. 1994. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. The Botanical Review 60: 83-139.
5. Campbell DR, Halama KJ. 1993. Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology 74: 1043-1051.
6. Charlesworth D. 1989. Evolution of low female fertility in plants: pollen limitation, resource allocation and genetic load. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 289-292.
7. Dafni A. 1992. Pollination ecology: a practical approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Dieringer G, Cabrera RL, Lara M, Loya L, Reyes-Castillo P. 1999. Beetle pollination and floral thermogenicity in Magnolia tamaulipana (Magnoliaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: 64-71.
9. Environment Agency of Japan. 2000. Threatened wildlife of Japan - Red Data Book, vol. 8. Vascular plants. Tokyo: Japan Wildlife Research Center (in Japanese).
10. Galloway LF, Cirigliano T, Gremski K. 2002. The contribution of display size and dichogamy to potential geitonogamy in Campanula americana. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 133-139.
11. Harder LD, Barrett SCH. 1996. Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York: Chapman and Hall, 140-190.
12. Holsinger KE. 1992. Ecological models of plant mating systems and the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. In: Wyatt R, ed. Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction. New York: Chapman and Hall, 169-191.
13. Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
14. Isagi Y, Kanazashi T, Suzuki W, Tanaka H, Abe T. 1999. Polymorphic microsatellite DNA makers for Magnolia obovata Thunb. and their utility in related species. Molecular Ecology 8: 685-702.
15. Ishida K. 1996. Beetle pollination of Magnolia praecocissima var. borealis. Plant Species Biology 11: 199-206.
16. Ishida K, Yoshimaru H, Itô H. 2003. Effects of geitonogamy on the seed set of Magnolia obovata Thunb. (Magnoliaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 729-735.
17. Japan Association for Shidekobushi Conservation. 1996. Wild stand of Shidekobushi (Star magnolia) in Japan. Mizunami City: Japan Association Shidekobushi Conservation (in Japanese).
18. de Jong TJ, Waser NM, Klinkhamer PGL. 1993. Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selling. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 321-325.
19. Kikuzawa K, Mizui N. 1990. Flowering and fruiting phenology of Magnolia hypoleuca. Plant Species Biology 5: 255-261.
20. Klinkhamer PGL, de Jong TJ. 1993. Attractiveness to pollinators: a plant's dilemma. Oikos 66: 180-184.
21. Kunin WE. 1993. Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed set. Ecology 74: 2145-2160.
22. Lande R, Schemske DW. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
23. Larson BMH, Barrett SCH. 2000. A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69: 503-520.
24. Lloyd DG. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153: 370-380.
25. Lynch M, Walsh B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
26. McCall C, Primack RB. 1992. Influence of flower characteristics weather, time of day, and season on insect visitation rates in three plant communities. American Journal of Botany 79: 434-442.
27. Maki M. 1993. Outcrossing and fecundity advantage of females in gynodioecious Chionographis japonica var. kurohimensis (Liliaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 629-634.
28. Manly BFJ. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and monte carlo methods in biology, 2nd edn. London: Chapman and Hall.
29. Milligan BG. 1998. Total DNA isolation. In: Hoelzel AR, ed. Molecular genetic analysis of population: a practical approach, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 29-64.
30. Motten AF. 1986. Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community of a temperate deciduous forest. Ecological Monographs 56: 21-42.
31. de Nettancourt D. 1977. Incompatibility in angiosperms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
32. Nooteboom HP. 1994. Proposals to reject Magnolia tomentosa (Thymelaeaceae) and conserve Magnolia kobus (Magnoliaceae) with a conserved type. Taxon 43: 467-468.
33. Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A. 1996. The natural history of pollination. Oregon: Timber Press, Inc.
34. Quinn GP, Keough MJ. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Ramsey MW. 1988. Differences in pollinator effectiveness of birds and insects visiting Banksia menziesii (Proteaceae). Oecologia 76: 119-124.
36. Ramsey M, Vaughton G. 2000. Pollen quality limits seed set in Burchardia umbellata (Colchicaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 845-852.
37. Rathcke BJ, Jules ES. 1993. Habitat fragmentation and plant-pollinator interactions. Current Science 65: 273-277.
38. Ritland K. 2002. Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88: 221-228. Source of program: http://genetics.forestry.ubc.ca/ritland/programs
39. Ritland K, Jain S. 1981. A model for the estimation of outcrossing rate and gene frequencies using n independent loci. Heredity 47: 35-52.
40. Rogstad SH. 1994. The biosystematics and evolution of the Polyalthia hypoleuca species complex (Annonaceae) of Malesia. III. Floral ontogeny and breeding systems. American Journal of Botany 81: 145-154.
41. Sage TL, Strumas F, Cole WW, Barrett SCH. 1999. Differential ovule development following self- and cross-pollination: The basis of self-sterility in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 855-870.
42. Seavey SR, Bawa KS. 1986. Late-acting self-incompatibility in angiosperms. The Botanical Review 52: 195-219.
43. Sih A, Baltus M-S. 1987. Patch size, pollinator behavior, and pollinator limitation in catnip. Ecology 68: 1679-1690.
44. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometory, 3rd edn. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
45. Stephenson AG. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: Proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 12: 253-279.
46. Thien LB. 1974. Floral biology of Magnolia. American Journal of Botany 61: 1037-1045.
47. Ueda K. 1986. A nomenclatural revision of the Japanese Magnolia species (Magnoliaceae), together with two long-cultivated Chinese species. II. M. tomentosa and M. praecocissima. Taxon 35: 344-347.
48. Wilson MF. 1979. Sexual selection in plants. American Naturalist 113: 777-790.
49. Zimmerman M, Pyke GH. 1988. Reproduction in Polemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. American Naturalist 131: 723-738.