Relationships between flowering phenology and female reproductive success in the Japanese tree species Magnolia stellata

Botany

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 248-258

  Setsuko, Suzuki ^a   Tamaki, Ichiro ^a   Ishida, Kiyoshi ^b   Tomaru, Nobuhiro ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Geitonogamy; Photoenvironment; Plant size; Protogyny; Seed production; Star magnolia

Indexed keywords

PLANTS (BOTANY); SEED;

GEITONOGAMY; PHOTOENVIRONMENT; PROTOGYNY; SEED PRODUCTION; STAR MAGNOLIA;

FORESTRY;

BODY SIZE; FLOWERING; GEITONOGAMY; GENET; PHENOLOGY; PROTOGYNY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEED PRODUCTION; SHRUB;

FORESTRY; PLANTS; SEEDS;

MAGNOLIA STELLATA; MAGNOLIACEAE;

EID: 42449141388     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B07-135     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Azuma, H., Toyota, M., Asakawa, Y., Yamaoka, R., Garcia-Franco, J., Dieringer, G., and Thien, L.B. 1997. Chemical divergence in floral scents of Magnolia and allied genera (Magnoliaceae). Plant Species Biol. 12: 69-83. doi:10.1111/j.1442-1984.1997.tb00159.x.
2. Bawa, K.S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 15-39. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.000311.
3. Bernhardt, P., and Thien, L.B. 1987. Self-isolation and insect pollination in the primitive angiosperms: new evaluations of older hypotheses. Plant Syst. Evol. 156: 159-176. doi:10.1007/BF00936071.
4. Callaway, D.J. 1994. The world of Magnolias. Timber Press, Portland, Ore.
5. Chan, H.T., and Appanah, S. 1980. Reproductive biology of some Malaysian Dipterocarps I. Flowering biology. Malays. For. 43: 132-143.
6. Dafni, A. 1984. Mimicry and deception in pollination. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 259-278. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.001355.
7. Dandy, J.E. 1978. A revised survey of the genus Magnolia together with Manglietia and Michelia. In Magnolias. Edited by N.G. Treseder. Faber and Faber, London, UK. pp. 29-37.
8. de Jong, T.J., Waser, N.M., Price, M.V., and Ring, R.M. 1992. Plant size, geitonogamy and seed set in Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia (Berl.), 89: 310-315.
9. Dieringer, G., Cabrera-R, L., Lara, M., Loya, L., and Reyes-Castillo, P. 1999. Beetle pollination and floral thermogenicity in Magnolia tamaulipana (Magnoliaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 160: 64-71. doi:10.1086/314099.
10. Environment Agency of Japan. 2000. Threatened wildlife of Japan - Red Data Book. Vol. 8. Vascular plants, 2nd ed. Japan Wildlife Research Center, Tokyo, Japan [in Japanese].
11. Godley, E.J., and Smith, D.H. 1981. Breeding systems in New Zealand plants. 5. Pseudowintera colorata (Winteraceae). N.Z. J. Bot. 19: 151-156.
12. Hara, M. 1992. Plants in Sapporo. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo, Japan [in Japanese].
13. Hirayama, K., Ishida, K., Setsuko, S., and Tomaru, N. 2007. Reduced seed production, inbreeding, and pollen shortage in a small population of a threatened tree, Magnolia stellata. Biol. Conserv. 136: 315-323. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.12.004.
14. Hirayama, K., Ishida, K., and Tomaru, N. 2005. Effects of pollen shortage and self-pollination on seed production of an endangered tree, Magnolia stellata. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 95: 1009-1015. doi:10.1093/aob/mci107. PMID:15753118.
15. Horikawa, Y. 1972. Atlas of the Japanese flora - an introduction to plant sociology of East Asia. Gakken, Tokyo, Japan [in Japanese].
16. Ishida, K. 1996. Beetle pollination of Magnolia praecocissima var. borealis. Plant Species Biol. 11: 199-206. doi:10.1111/j.1442- 1984.1996.tb00146.x.
17. Ishida, K., Yoshimaru, H., and Ito, H. 2003. Effects of geitonogamy on the seed set of Magnolia obovata Thunb. (Magnoliaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 164: 729-735. doi:10.1086/376812.
18. Japan Association for Shidekobushi Conservation. 1996. Wild stand of Shidekobushi (star magnolia) in Japan. Japan Association for Shidekobushi Conservation, Mizunami City, Japan [in Japanese].
19. Kikuzawa, K. 1987. Development and survival of leaves in Magnolia obovata in a deciduous broad-leaved forest in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Can. J. Bot. 65: 412-417. doi:10.1139/b87-050.
20. Kikuzawa, K., and Mizui, N. 1990. Flowering and fruiting phenology of Magnolia hypoleuca. Plant Species Biol. 5: 255-261. doi:10.1111/j.1442-1984.1990.tb00185.x.
21. Mauricio, R., and Mojonnier, L.E. 1997. Reducing bias in the measurement of selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 433-436. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97) 01178-6.
22. McIntosh, M.E. 2002. Flowering phenology and reproductive output in two sister species of Ferocactus (Cactaceae). Plant Ecol. 159: 1-13. doi:10.1023/A:1015589002987.
23. Mizui, N. 1993. Ecological studies on reproduction in deciduous broad-leaved tree species. Bull. Hokkaido For. Res. Inst. 30: 1-67 [in Japanese with English abstract].
24. Nooteboom, H.P. 1994. Proposals to reject Magnolia tomentosa (Thymelaeaceae) and conserve Magnolia kobus (Magnoliaceae) with a conserved type. Taxon, 43: 467-468. doi:10.2307/1222726.
25. Ollerton, J., and Lack, A. 1998. Relationships between flowering phenology, plant size and reproductive success in shape Lotus corniculatus (Fabaceae). Plant Ecol. 139: 35-47. doi:10.1023/A: 1009798320049.
26. Opler, P.A., Frankie, G.W., and Baker, H.G. 1976. Rainfall as a factor in the release, timing, and synchronization of anthesis by tropical trees and shrubs. J. Biogeogr. 3: 231-236. doi:10.2307/3038013.
27. Osunkoya, O.O. 1999. Population structure and breeding biology in relation to conservation in the dioecious Gardenia actinocarpa (Rubiaceae) - a rare shrub of North Queensland rainforest. Biol. Conserv. 88: 347-359. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00115-3.
28. Prefecture of Aichi. 1998. Nature conservation research in southeast Seto city (woodland area). Aichi Prefecture, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan [in Japanese].
29. Primack, R.B. 1985. Longevity of individual flowers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 15-37. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000311.
30. Ramsey, M.W. 1988. Differences in pollinator effectiveness of birds and insects visiting Banksia menziesii (Proteaceae). Oecologia (Berl.), 76: 119-124.
31. Rathcke, B., and Lacey, E.P. 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 179-214. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16. 110185.001143.
32. Rathcke, B.J. 2003. Floral longevity and reproductive assurance: seasonal patterns and an experimental test with Kalmia latifolia (Ericaceae). Am. J. Bot. 90: 1328-1332.
33. Reich, P.B., and Borchert, R. 1982. Phenology and ecophysiology of the tropical tree, Tabebuia neochrysantha (Bignoniaceae). Ecology, 63: 294-299. doi:10.2307/1938945.
34. Robertson, C. 1895. The philosophy of flower seasons, and the phenological relations of the entomophilous flora and the anthophilous insect fauna. Am. Nat. 29: 97-117. doi:10.1086/276089.
35. Satake, Y., Hara, H., Watari, S., and Tominari, T. 1989. Wild flowers of Japan - Woody plants. Heibonsha, Tokyo, Japan [in Japanese].
36. Schemske, D.W., Willson, M.F., Melampy, M.N., Miller, L.J., Verner, L., Schemske, K.M., and Best, L.B. 1978. Flowering ecology of some spring woodland herbs. Ecology, 59: 351-366. doi:10.2307/1936379.
37. Schmitt, J. 1983. Individual flowering phenology, plant size, an reproductive success in Linanthus androsaceus, a California annual. Oecologia (Berl.), 59: 135-140. doi:10.1007/BF00388084.
38. Setsuko, S., Ishida, K., and Tomaru, N. 2004. Size distribution and genetic structure in relation to clonal growth within a population of Magnolia tomentosa Thunb. (Magnoliaceae). Mol. Ecol. 13: 2645-2653. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02271.x. PMID:15315677.
39. Sih, A., and Baltus, M.S. 1987. Patch size, pollinator behavior, and pollinator limitation in catnip. Ecology, 68: 1679-1690. doi:10.2307/1939860.
40. Smithberg, M.H., and Weiser, C.J. 1968. Patterns of variation among climatic races of red-osier dogwood. Ecology, 49: 495-505. doi:10.2307/1934116.
41. Takhtajan, A.L. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev. 46: 225-359.
42. Tamaki, I., Hoshino, D., Setsuko, S., Tomaru, N., and Yamamoto, S. 2005. Population structure of woody species in the Kaisho Forest. Chubu Forestry Research, 53: 45-48 [in Japanese].
43. The R Development Core Team. 2003. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available from www.r-project.org/ [accessed 24 December 2006].
44. Thien, L.B. 1974. Floral biology of Magnolia. Am. J. Bot. 61: 1037-1045. doi:10.2307/2441921.
45. Thien, L.B., Azuma, H., and Kawano, S. 2000. New perspectives on the pollination biology of basal angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161: S225-S235. doi:10.1086/317575.
46. Thien, L.B., Heimermann, W.H., and Holman, R.T. 1975. Floral odors and quantitative taxonomy of Magnolia and Liriodendron. Taxon, 24: 557-568. doi:10.2307/1220717.
47. Ueda, K. 1986. A nomenclatural revision of the Japanese Magnolia species (Magnoliaceae), together with two long - cultivated Chinese species. II. M. tomentosa and M. praecocissima. Taxon, 35: 344-347. doi:10.2307/1221288.
48. Ueda, K. 1987. Notes on the Magnoliaceae. Acta Phytotaxon. Geobot. 38: 339-348 [in Japanese].
49. Vasek, F.C., and Sauer, R.H. 1971. Seasonal progression of flowering in Clarkia. Ecology, 52: 1038-1045. doi:10.2307/1933810.
50. Vázquez-G, J.A. 1994. Magnolia (Magnoliaceae) in Mexico and Central America: a synopsis. Brittonia, 46: 1-23. doi:10.2307/2807454.
51. Yasukawa, S., Kato, H., Yamaoka, R., Tanaka, H., Arai, H., and Kawano, S. 1992. Reproductive and pollination biology of Magnolia and its allied genera. (Magnoliaceae) I. Floral volatiles of several Magnolia and Michelia species and their roles in attracting insects. Plant Species Biol. 7: 121-140. doi:10.1111/j.1442-1984.1992.tb00225.x.