Variation in lifetime male fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata: Tests of sex allocation theory

American Naturalist

Volumn 152, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 338-353

  Campbell, Diane R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ipomopsis aggregata; Male fitness; Paternity; Sex allocation

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; FITNESS; FLOWERING PLANT; HERMAPHRODITISM; MODEL;

AGGREGATA; DICOTYLEDONEAE; IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 0031684890     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/286173     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Adams, W. T., A. R. Griffin, and G. F. Moran. 1992. Using paternity analysis to measure effective pollen dispersal in plant populations. American Naturalist 140: 762-780.
2. Ågren, J., and D. W. Schemske. 1995. Sex allocation in the monoecious herb Begonia semiovata. Evolution 49: 121-130.
3. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38: 709-719.
4. Ashman, T. 1994a. A dynamic perspective on the physiological cost of reproduction in plants. American Naturalist 144:300-316.
5. _. 1994b. Reproductive allocation in hermaphrodite and female plants of Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata (Malvaceae) using four currencies. American Journal of Botany 81:433-438.
6. Ashman, T., and I. Baker. 1992. Variation in floral sex allocation with time of season and currency. Ecology 73: 1237-1243.
7. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
8. Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 223:224-265.
9. Bertin, R. I. 1982. Paternity and fruit production in trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans). American Naturalist 119:694-709.
10. Brody, A. K., and R. J. Mitchell. 1997. Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the humming-bird-pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia (Berlin) 110:86-93.
11. Broyles, S. B., and R. Wyatt. 1990. Paternity analysis in a natural population of Asclepias exaltata: multiple paternity, functional gender, and the "pollen-donation hypothesis." Evolution 44:1454-1468.
12. _. 1995. A reexamination of the pollen-donation hypothesis in an experimental population of Asclepias exaltata. Evolution 49:89-99.
13. Burd, M., and G. Head. 1992. Phenological aspects of male and female function in hermaphroditic plants. American Naturalist 140:305-324.
14. Campbell, D. R. 1989. Inflorescence size: test of the male function hypothesis. American Journal of Botany 76: 730-738.
15. _. 1991. Comparing pollen dispersal and gene flow in a natural plant population. Evolution 45:1965-1968.
16. _. 1992. Variation in sex allocation and floral morphology in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 79:516-521.
17. _. 1997a. Genetic and environmental variation in life-history traits of a monocarpic perennial: a decade-long field experiment. Evolution 51:373-382.
18. _. 1997b. Genetic correlation between biomass allocation to male and female functions in a natural plant population. Heredity 79:606-614.
19. _. 1998. Multiple paternity in fruits of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 85 (in press).
20. Campbell, D. R., and J. L. Dooley. 1992. The spatial scale of genetic differentiation in a hummingbird-pollinated plant: comparison with models of isolation by distance. American Naturalist 139:735-748.
21. Campbell, D. R., and N. M. Waser. 1989. Variation in pollen flow within and among populations of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 43:1444-1455.
22. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, M. V. Price, E. A. Lynch, and R. J. Mitchell. 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: pollen export and flower corolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 45:1458-1467.
23. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, and M. V. Price. 1996. Mechanisms of hummingbird-mediated selection for flower width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 77:1463-1472.
24. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1981. Allocation of resources to male and female function in hermaphrodites. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 15: 57-74.
25. _. 1987. The effect of investment in attractive structures on allocation to male and female functions in plants. Evolution 41:948-968.
26. Charlesworth, D., and M. T. Morgan. 1991. Allocation of resources to sex functions in flowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 332:91-102.
27. Charnov, E. L. 1979. Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 76:2480-2484.
28. _. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
29. Charnov, E. L., and J. J. Bull. 1986. Sex allocation, pollinator attraction and fruit dispersal in cosexual plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology 118:321-326.
30. Conner, J. K., S. Rush, and P. Jennetten. 1996. Measurements of natural selection on floral traits in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). II. Selection through lifetime male and total fitness. Evolution 50:1137-1146.
31. de Jong, T. J., N. M. Waser, M. V. Price, and R. M. Ring. 1992. Plant size, geitonogamy and seed set in Ipomopsis aggregate Oecologia (Berlin) 89:310-315.
32. de Jong, T. J., N. M. Waser, and P. G. L. Kinkhamer. 1993. Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8:321-325.
33. Devlin, B., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1990. Male and female fertility variation in wild radish, a hermaphrodite. American Naturalist 136:87-102.
34. Devlin, B., K. Roeder, and N. C. Ellstrand. 1988. Fractional paternity assignment: theoretical development and comparison to other methods. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 76:369-380.
35. Devlin, B., J. Clegg, and N. C. Ellstrand. 1992. The effect of flower production on male reproductive success in wild radish populations. Evolution 46:1030-1042.
36. Emms, S. K. 1993. On measuring fitness gain curves in plants. Ecology 74:1750-1756.
37. Emms, S. K., D. A. Stratton, and A. A. Snow. 1997. The effect of inflorescence size on male fitness: experimental tests in the andromonoecious lily, Zigadenus paniculatus. Evolution 51:1481-1489.
38. Geber, M. A., and E. L. Charnov. 1986. Sex allocation in hermaphrodites with partial overlap in male/female resource inputs. Journal of Theoretical Biology 118:33-43.
39. Harder, L. D., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1995. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature (London) 373:512-515.
40. Houle, D. 1991. Genetic covariance of fitness correlates: what genetic correlations are made of and why it matters. Evolution 45:630-648.
41. Lau, T., and A. G. Stephenson. 1993. Effects of soil nitrogen on pollen production, pollen grain size, and pollen performance in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). American Journal of Botany 80:763-768.
42. Lee, T. D., and F. A. Bazzaz. 1982. Regulation of fruit and seed production in an annual legume. Ecology 63:1363-1373.
43. Levin, D. A. 1988. The paternity pool of plants. American Naturalist 132:309-317.
44. Lloyd, D. G. 1984. Gender allocations in outcrossing cosexual plants. Pages 277-300 in R. Dirzo and J. Sarukhan, eds. Perspectives in plant population ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
45. _. 1987. A general principle for the allocation of limited resources. Evolutionary Ecology 2:175-187.
46. Louda, S. M., and M. A. Potvin. 1995. Effect of inflorescence-feeding insects on the demography and lifetime fitness of a native plant. Ecology 76:229-245.
47. Lovett Doust, J., and J. L. Harper. 1980. The resource costs of gender and maternal support in an andromonoecious umbellifer, Smyrnium olusatrum L. New Phytologist 85:251-264.
48. McKone, M. J. 1987. Sex allocation and outcrossing rate: a test of theoretical predictions using bromegrass (Bromus). Evolution 41:591-598.
49. Meagher, T. R. 1991. Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. II. Patterns of male reproductive success. American Naturalist 137:738-752.
50. Milligan, B. G., and C. K. McMurry. 1993. Dominant versus codominant genetic markers in the estimation of male mating success. Molecular Ecology 2:275-283.
51. Molau, U. 1991. Gender variation in Bartsia alpina (Scrophulariaceae), a subarctic perennial hermaphrodite. American Journal of Botany 78:326-339.
52. Morgan, M. T. 1992. The evolution of traits influencing male and female fertility in outcrossing plants. American Naturalist 139:1022-1051.
53. Morgan, M. T., and D. J. Schoen. 1997. The role of theory in an emerging new plant reproductive biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12:231-234.
54. Nakamura, R. R., M. L. Stanton, and S. J. Mazer. 1989. Effects of mate size and mate number on male reproductive success in plants. Ecology 70:71-76.
55. O'Neil, P., and J. Schmitt. 1993. Genetic constraints on the independent evolution of male and female reproductive characters in the tristylous plant Lythrum salicaria. Evolution 47:1457-1471.
56. Primack, R. B., and D. G. Lloyd. 1980. Sexual strategies in plants. IV. The distributions of gender in two monomorphic shrub populations. New Zealand Journal of Botany 18:109-114.
57. Queller, D. C. 1983. Sexual selection in a hermaphroditic plant. Nature (London) 305:706-707.
58. _. 1997. Pollen removal, paternity, and the male function of flowers. American Naturalist 149:585-594.
59. Rausher, M. D. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46:616-626.
60. Roeder, K. M., B. Devlin, and B. G. Lindsay. 1989. Application of maximum likelihood methods to population genetic data for the estimation of individual fertilities. Biometrics 45:363-379.
61. Sakai, A. K., W. L. Wagner, D. M. Ferguson, and D. R. Herbst. 1995. Origins of dioecy in the Hawaiian flora. Ecology 76:2517-2529.
62. SAS Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6.04 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.
63. Schoen, D. J. 1982. Male reproductive effort and breeding system in an hermaphroditic plant. Oecologia (Berlin) 53:255-257.
64. Schoen, D. J., and S. C. Stewart. 1986. Variation in male reproductive investment and male reproductive success in white spruce. Evolution 40:1109-1120.
65. Seger, J., and V. M. Eckhart. 1996. Evolution of sexual systems and sex allocation in plants when growth and reproduction overlap. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 263:833-841.
66. Smouse, P. E., and T. R. Meagher. 1994. Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae). Genetics 136:313-322.
67. Snow, A. A., and P. O. Lewis. 1993. Reproductive traits and male fertility in plants: empirical approaches. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:331-351.
68. Stanton, M. L., and L. F. Galloway. 1990. Natural selection and allocation to reproduction in flowering plants. Pages 1-50 in M. Mangel, ed. Sex allocation and sex change: experiments and models. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I.
69. Stanton, M. L., and R. E. Preston. 1988. Ecological consequences and phenotypic correlates of petal size variation in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 75:528-539.
70. Stanton, M. L., A. A. Snow, and S. N. Handel. 1986. Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness. Science (Washington, D.C.) 232:1625-1627.
71. Stephenson, A. G. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12:253-279.
72. Stephenson, A. G., and R. I. Bertin. 1983. Male competition, female choice, and sexual selection in plants. Pages 109-149 in L. Real, ed. Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla.
73. Stephenson, A. G., and J. A. Winsor. 1986. Lotus cornicnlatns regulates offspring quality through selective fruit abortion. Evolution 40:453-458.
74. Sutherland, S. 1986. Patterns of fruit-set: what controls fruit-flower ratios in plants? Evolution 40:117-128.
75. Sutherland, S., and L. F. Delph. 1984. On the importance of male fitness in plants: patterns of fruit-set. Ecology 65:1093-1104.
76. van Noordwijk, A. J., and G. de Jong. 1986. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life-history tactics. American Naturalist 128: 137-142.
77. Waser, N. M. 1982. A comparison of distances flown by different visitors to flowers of the same species. Oecologia (Berlin) 55:251-257.
78. Waser, N. M., and M. V. Price. 1983. Optimal and actual outcrossing, and the nature of plant-pollinator interaction. Pages 341-359 in C. E. Jones and R. J. Little, eds. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
79. 1989. Optimal outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregata: seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution 43:1097-1109.
80. Willson, M. 1979. Sexual selection in plants. American Naturalist 113:777-790.
81. Wilson, P., J. D. Thomson, M. L Stanton, and L. P. Rigney. 1994. Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success. American Naturalist 143:283-296.
82. Yampolsky, E., and H. Yampolsky. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in phanerogamic flora. Bibliotheca Genetica 3:1-62.