ECG-Triggered Non-Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography (TRANCE) versus Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease of the lower extremities

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1979-1987

  Gutzeit, Andreas ^a,d   Sutter, Reto ^a,e   Froehlich, Johannes M ^a   Roos, Justus E ^a   Sautter, Thomas ^a   Schoch, Erik ^a   Giger, Barbara ^a   Wyss, Michael ^b   Graf, Nicole ^c   Von Weymarn, Constantin ^a   Jenelten, Regula ^a   Binkert, Christoph A ^a   Hergan, Klaus ^d  

^a CANTONAL HOSPITAL WINTERTHUR   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^e BALGRIST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Digital subtraction angiography; Lower extremity; Nephrotoxicity; Non contrast enhanced MR angiography; Peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENOSIS;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; COHORT STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 80052756892     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2132-4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. W Rosamond K Flegal G Friday, et al. 2006 Heart disease and stroke statistics-2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Circulation 115 69 71 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.179918
2. MM McDermott L Tian K Liu, et al. 2008 Prognostic value of functional performance for mortality in patients with peripheral artery disease J Am Coll Cardiol 15 1482 1489 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.034 (Pubitemid 351492522)
3. YW Nielsen JP Eiberg VB Løgager S Just TV Schroeder HS Thomsen 2010 Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography with additional steady-state acquisition of the infragenicular arteries in patients with peripheral arterial disease Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 33 484 491 10.1007/s00270-009-9759-4
4. J Vavrik GM Rohrmoser B Madani M Ersek D Tscholakoff RA Bucek 2004 Comparison of MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography as a basis for planning treatment of lower limb occlusive disease J Endovasc Ther 11 294 301 15174919 10.1583/03-1144.1 (Pubitemid 38802612)
5. H Ersoy FJ Rybicki 2008 MR angiography of the lower extremities AJR Am J Roentgenol 190 1675 1684 18492924 10.2214/AJR.07.2223 (Pubitemid 351798548)
6. C Loewe M Schoder T Rand, et al. 2002 Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 1013 1021 12239057
7. SG Ruehm TF Hany T Pfammatter E Schneider M Ladd JF Debatin 2000 Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 1127 1135 10749264 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3htVyhsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30180017)
8. RW Huegli M Aschwanden G Bongartz, et al. 2006 Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison Radiology 239 901 908 16641335 10.1148/radiol.2393041574
9. HS Thomsen 2006 Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a serious late adverse reaction to gadodiamide Eur Radiol 16 2619 2621 17061066 10.1007/s00330-006- 0495-8 (Pubitemid 44823915)
10. MR Prince HL Zhang GH Roditi T Leiner W Kucharczyk 2009 Risk factors for NSF: a literature review J Magn Reson Imaging 30 1298 1308 19937930 10.1002/jmri.21973
11. VJ Wedeen RA Meuli RR Edelman, et al. 1985 Projective imaging of pulsatile flow with magnetic resonance Science 23 946 948 10.1126/science. 4059917 (Pubitemid 16193991)
12. RP Lim EM Hecht J Xu, et al. 2008 3D non gadolinium-enhanced ECG-gated MRA of the distal lower extremities: preliminary clinical experience J Magn Reson Imaging 28 181 189 18581339 10.1002/jmri.21416 (Pubitemid 351956482)
13. OK Mohrs SE Petersen MC Heidt, et al. 2010 High-resolution 3D non-contrast-enhanced, ECG-gated, multi-step MR angiography of the lower extremities: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography Eur Radiol 195 1423 1428
14. K Hughes CM Domenig AD Hamdan, et al. 2004 Bypass to plantar and tarsal arteries: an acceptable approach to limb salvage J Vasc Surg 40 1149 1157 15622369 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.08.037 (Pubitemid 40037283)
15. SA Arain CJ White 2008 Endovascular therapy for critical limb ischemia Vasc Med 13 267 279 18687765 10.1177/1358863X07087129
16. PN Suding W McMaster E Hansen AW Hatfield IL Gordon SE Wilson 2008 Increased endovascular interventions decrease the rate of lower limb artery bypass operations without an increase in major amputation rate Ann Vasc Surg 22 195 199 18346571 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.12.002 (Pubitemid 351381311)
17. JH Rogers JR Laird 2007 Overview of new technologies for lower extremity revascularization Circulation 116 2072 2085 17967988 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107. 715433 (Pubitemid 350027514)
18. JW Olin BA Sealove 2010 Peripheral artery disease: current insight into the disease and its diagnosis and management Mayo Clin Proc 85 678 692 20592174 10.4065/mcp.2010.0133
19. OA Meissner J Rieger C Weber, et al. 2005 Critical limb ischemia: hybrid MR angiography compared with DSA Radiology 235 308 318 15716387 10.1148/radiol.2343031685 (Pubitemid 40432268)
20. WY Hahn EM Hecht B Friedman JS Babb GR Jacobowitz VS Lee 2007 Distal lower extremity imaging: prospective comparison of 2-dimensional time of flight, 3-dimensional time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and 3-dimensional bolus chase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography J Comput Assist Tomogr 31 29 36 17259830 10.1097/01.rct.0000235073.72926.4d (Pubitemid 46183339)
21. M Miyazaki VS Lee 2008 Nonenhanced MR angiography Radiology 248 20 43 18566168 10.1148/radiol.2481071497
22. S Thurnher S Miller G Schneider, et al. 2007 Diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography of the iliofemoral and calf arteries: a large multicenter trial AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 1223 1237 17954665 10.2214/AJR.07.2218 (Pubitemid 350033021)
23. M Bosiers JP Hart K Deloose J Verbist P Peeters 2006 Endovascular therapy as the primary approach for limb salvage in patients with critical limb ischemia: experience with 443 infrapopliteal procedures Vascular 14 63 69 16956473 10.2310/6670.2006.00014 (Pubitemid 44047250)
24. RP Lim P Storey IP Atanasova, et al. 2009 Three-dimensional electrocardiographically gated variable flip angle FSE imaging for MR angiography of the hands at 3.0T: initial experience Radiology 252 874 881 19567653 10.1148/radiol.2531090290
25. S Kos C Reisinger M Aschwanden GM Bongartz AL Jacob D Bilecen 2009 Pedal angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: first-pass i.v. contrast-enhanced MR angiography with blood pool contrast medium versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography AJR Am J Roentgenol 192 775 784 19234277 10.2214/AJR.08.1384