Comparison of MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography as a basis for planning treatment of lower limb occlusive disease

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 294-301

  Vavrik, Joachim ^a   Rohrmoser, Georg Michael ^a   Madani, Babak ^a   Ersek, Murat ^a   Tscholakoff, Dimiter ^a   Bucek, Robert A ^a,b  

^a Department of Medicine 1   (Austria)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Digital subtraction angiography; Femoropopliteal segment; Lower limb arteries; Magnetic resonance angiography; Occlusive disease; Superficial femoral artery; Tibial arteries

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMOROPOPLITEAL REGION; GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE; HUMAN; INGUINAL REGION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG; LEG ISCHEMIA; LEG OCCLUSIVE DISEASE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY; SUPRAINGUINAL REGION; TIBIAL ARTERY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; ARTIFACTS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 3042658651     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/03-1144.1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Fowkes FG, Housley E, Cawood EH, et al. Edinburgh Artery Study: prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the general population. Int J Epidemiol. 1991;20:384-392.
2. Stoffers HE, Kaiser V, Knottnerus JA. Prevalence in general practice. In: Fowkes FGR, ed. Epidemiology of Peripheral Vascular Disease. London: Springer-Verlag; 1991:109-111.
3. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology. 1995;197:785-792.
4. Perendreu J, Montanya X, Callejas JM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of and morbidity from digital subtraction angiography. A study of 5817 cases [in French]. Ann Radiol (Paris). 1996;39:153-160.
5. Visser K, Hunink MG. Peripheral arterial disease: gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus color-guided duplex US-a meta-analysis. Radiology. 2000;216:67-77.
6. Prokop M. Multislice CT angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2000;36:86-96.
7. Poon E, Yucel EK, Pagan-Marin H, Kayne H. Iliac artery stenosis measurements: comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1139-1144.
8. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, et al. Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:431-437.
9. Ho KY, de Haan MW, Oei TK, et al. MR angiography of the iliac and upper femoral arteries using four different inflow techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:45-53.
10. Lee HM, Wang Y, Sostman HD, et al. Distal lower extremity arteries: evaluation with two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 1998;207:505-512.
11. Earls JP, Patel NH, Smith PA, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:599-604.
12. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, et al. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;206:683-692.
13. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology. 1999;211:59-67.
14. Busch HP, Hoffmann HG, Metzner C, et al. MR angiography of the lower extremities with an automatic table translation (Mobitrak) compared to i.a. DSA [in German]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 1999;170:275-283.
15. Ho VB, Choyke PL, Foo TIC, et al. Automated bolus chase peripheral MR angiography: initial practical experiences and future directions of this work-in-progress. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:376-388.
16. Leiner T, Ho KY, Nelemans PJ, et al. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-bed infusion-tracking (MoBl-track) peripheral MR angiography with flexible choice of imaging-parameters for each field of view. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11:368-377.
17. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Ademan MA, et al. Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 1997;205:163-169.
18. Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Semonsen KG, et al. Aortic and lower extremity arterial disease: evaluation with MR angiography versus conventional angiography. Radiology. 1998;206:693-701.
19. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HC, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology. 2000;217:105-114.
20. Kreitner K-F, Kalden P, Neufang A, et al. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:171-179.
21. Winterer JT, Laubenberger J, Scheffler K, et al. Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999;23:583-589.
22. Ho KY, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, et al. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: detection with subtracted and nonsubtracted MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;206:673-681.
23. Loewe C, Schoder M, Rand T, et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1013-1021.
24. Hentsch A, Aschauer MA, Balzer JO, et al. Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2103-2114.
25. Dormandy JA, Rutherford B. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:S1-S296.
26. Carriero A, Maggialetti A, Pinto D, et al. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography MoBl-trak in the study of peripheral vascular disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002;25:42-47.
27. Fenchel S, Wisianowsky C, Schams S, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA of the aortoiliac and infrainguinal arteries when conventional transfemoral arteriography is not feasible. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9:511-519.
28. Turski PA, Korosec FR, Carroll TJ, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid bifurcation using the time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) technique. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;12:175-181.
29. Hany TF, Carroll TJ, Omary RA, et al. Aorta and runoff vessels: single-injection MR angiography with automated table movement compared with multiinjection time-resolved MR angiography-initial results. Radiology. 2001;221:266-272.
30. Ruehm SG, Hany TF, Pfammatter T, et al. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1127-1135.
31. Hood MN, Ho VB, Foo TK, et al. High-resolution gadolinium-enhanced 3D MRA of the infrapopliteal arteries. Lessons for improving boluschase peripheral MRA. Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;20:543-549.
32. Winterer JT, Schaefer O, Uhrmeister P, et al. Contrast enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of relevant stenoses in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: diagnostic value of a two-step examination protocol in comparison to conventional DSA. Eur J Radiol. 2002;41:153-160.