Comparison of T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T for assessing the local extent of cervical carcinoma

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1850-1857

  Akita, Ayano ^a   Shinmoto, Hiroshi ^b   Hayashi, Shigenori ^c   Akita, Hirotaka ^a   Fujii, Takuma ^a   Mikami, Shuji ^a   Tanimoto, Akihiro ^a   Kuribayashi, Sachio ^a  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION TOKYO MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Comparative study; Diagnostic imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Uterine cervical cancer; Uterine cervical neoplasms

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NOISE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RATING SCALE; T1 WEIGHTED IMAGING; T2 WEIGHTED IMAGING; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; COHORT STUDIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 80052727474     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2122-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. The National Cancer Institute (Updated 22 Jul 2010) Title of Stage 1B Cervical Cancer. The National Cancer Institute. Available via http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/cervical/HealthProfessional/ page7. Accessed 20 Sep 2010
2. E Marhhom I Cohen 2007 Fertility preservation options for women with malignancies Obstet Gynecol Surv 62 58 72 17176489 10.1097/01.ogx.0000251029. 93792.5d (Pubitemid 46360535)
3. L Rob P Skapa H Robova 2011 Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with cervical cancer Lancet Oncol 12 192 200 20619737 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70084-X
4. D Dargent X Martin A Sacchetoni P Mathevet 2000 Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy: a treatment to preserve the fertility of cervical carcinoma patients Cancer 88 1877 1882 10760765 10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0142(20000415)88:8<1877::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-W 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c3isFKjsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30212998)
5. PD Peppercorn AR Jeyarajah R Woolas, et al. 1999 Role of MR imaging in the selection of patients with early cervical carcinoma for fertility-preserving surgery: initial experience Radiology 212 395 399 10429696 1:STN:280: DyaK1MzlvVehtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29356559)
6. K Togashi K Nishimura K Itoh, et al. 1986 Uterine cervical cancer: assessment with high-field MR imaging Radiology 160 431 435 3726122 1:STN:280:DyaL283mtVKhtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 16070654)
7. K Togashi K Nishimura T Sagoh, et al. 1989 Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging Radiology 171 245 251 2928532 1:STN:280: DyaL1M7osFCqsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19093078)
8. S Sironi F De Cobelli G Scarfone E Colombo G Bolis A Ferrari A DelMaschio 1993 Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness Radiology 188 797 801 8351350 1:STN:280:DyaK3szlsFSitQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23254604)
9. J Scheidler AF Heuck M Steinborn R Kimmig MF Reiser 1998 Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression Radiology 206 125 129 9423661 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FosFOiuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28062995)
10. S Pecorelli L Zigliani F Odicino 2009 Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105 107 108 19342051 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02. 009
11. H Hricak KK Yu 1996 Radiology in invasive cervical cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 167 1101 1108 8911159 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2Fmslygsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26376214)
12. P Marchiolè G Cittadini P Sala M Moioli P Mathevet E Capaccio S Costantini 2010 Pre- and post-operative work-up in patients affected by early cervical cancer and eligible for fertility-sparing treatment: role of MRI with saline hydrocolpos Abdom Imaging 35 271 279 19305940 10.1007/s00261-009-9511-1
13. DG Mitchell B Snyder F Coakley, et al. 2006 Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study J Clin Oncol 24 5687 5694 17179104 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.4799 (Pubitemid 46631310)
14. S Sironi C Belloni G Taccagni A DelMaschio 1991 Invasive cervical carcinoma: MR imaging after preoperative chemotherapy Radiology 180 719 722 1871283 1:STN:280:DyaK3MzjsVOlug%3D%3D
15. A Vives C Castelo-Branco X Iglesias, et al. 1995 Is MRI helpful in evaluating the response of cervical cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74 467 471 7541596 10.3109/00016349509024411 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzivVCisg%3D%3D
16. P Mathevet E Laszlo de Kaszon D Dargent 2003 Fertility preservation in early cervical cancer Gynécol Obstét Fertil 31 706 712 14499714 10.1016/S1297-9589(03)00200-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3svktVCltA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 37158565)
17. M Plante MC Renaud H François M Roy 2004 Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature Gynecol Oncol 94 614 623 15350349 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.032 (Pubitemid 39194451)
18. C Balleyguier E Sala T Da Cunha, et al. 2010 Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Eur Radiol 10.1007/s00330-010-1998-x
19. EM Charles-Edwards C Messiou VA Morgan, et al. 2008 Diffusion-weighted imaging in cervical cancer with an endovaginal technique: potential value for improving tumor detection in stage Ia and Ib1 disease Radiology 249 541 550 18936313 10.1148/radiol.2491072165
20. EK Choi JK Kim HJ Choi, et al. 2009 Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI Eur Radiol 19 2024 2032 19277675 10.1007/s00330-009-1350-5
21. K Itoh T Shiozawa S Ohira S Shiohara I Konishi 2006 Correlation between MRI and histopathologic findings in stage I cervical carcinomas: influence of stromal desmoplastic reaction Int J Gynecol Cancer 16 610 614 16681734 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00383.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283lslymtw%3D%3D
22. NM deSouza R Dina GA McIndoe WP Soutter 2006 Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension Gynecol Oncol 102 80 85 16427688 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.038 (Pubitemid 44183745)
23. K Tsuda T Murakami H Kurachi, et al. 1997 MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: comparison among T2-weighted, dynamic, and postcontrast T1-weighted images with histopathological correlation Abdom Imaging 22 103 107 9000368 10.1007/s002619900151 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7ltlCmtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27030228)
24. Y Yamashita M Takahashi T Sawada K Miyazaki H Okamura 1992 Carcinoma of the cervix: dynamic MR imaging Radiology 182 643 648 1535875 1:STN:280:DyaK387lvFemsA%3D%3D
25. H Seki R Azumi M Kimura K Sakai 1997 Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging AJR Am J Roentgenol 168 1579 1585 9168730 1:STN:280:DyaK2szht1aruw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27232686)
26. M Hori T Kim T Murakami, et al. 2009 Uterine cervical carcinoma: preoperative staging with 3.0-T MR imaging-comparison with 1.5-T MR imaging Radiology 251 96 104 19221059 10.1148/radiol.2511081265