Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1102-1110

  Balleyguier, Corinne ^a   Sala, E ^b   Da Cunha, T ^c   Bergman, A ^d   Brkljacic, B ^e   Danza, F ^f   Forstner, R ^g   Hamm, B ^h   Kubik Huch, R ⁱ   Lopez, C ^j   Manfredi, R ^j   McHugo, J ^k   Oleaga, L ^l   Togashi, K ^m   Kinkel, K ⁿ  

^a INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

^b ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTO PORTUGUÊS DE ONCOLOGIA DE LISBOA FRANCISCO GENTIL   (Portugal)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e University of Zagreb School of Medicine   (Croatia)

^f CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^g LandesklinikenSalzburg ^*  (Austria)

^h CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

ⁱ Kantonsspital Baden   (Germany)

^j FONDAZIONE POLICLINICO UNIVERSITARIO A GEMELLI IRCCS   (Italy)

^k BIRMINGHAM WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^l HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

^m KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

ⁿ Institut de Radiologie   (Switzerland)

more..

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Cervix; Magnetic resonance (MR); Staging; Uterus

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM CHELATE;

ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIS LYMPH NODE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; ARTIFACTS; CHELATING AGENTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; EUROPE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; NEOPLASM STAGING; RADIOLOGY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 79954433560     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1998-x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. O Ozsarlak W Tjalma E Schepens B Corthouts B Op de Beeck E Van Marck, et al. 2003 The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma Eur Radiol 13 2338 2345 12802611 10.1007/s00330-003-1928-2 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3svnt1agsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 37220369)
2. F Odicino G Tisi F Rampinelli R Miscioscia E Sartori S Pecorelli 2007 New development of the FIGO staging system Gynecol Oncol 107 1 Suppl 1 S8 S9 17761268 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.07.018 (Pubitemid 47483861)
3. LD Lagasse WT Creasman HM Shingleton JH Ford JA Blessing 1980 Results and complications of operative staging in cervical cancer: experience of the Gynecologic Oncology Group Gynecol Oncol 9 90 98 7353805 10.1016/0090-8258(80) 90013-X 1:STN:280:DyaL3c7htl2itQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 10175950)
4. MS Piver WS Chung 1975 Prognostic significance of cervical lesion size and pelvic node metastases in cervical carcinoma Obstet Gynecol 46 507 510 1196552 1:STN:280:DyaE28%2Fns1Cjsw%3D%3D
5. S Pecorelli 2009 Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105 103 104 19367689 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009. 02.012
6. M Hori T Kim T Murakami I Imaoka H Onishi K Tomoda, et al. 2009 Uterine cervical carcinoma: preoperative staging with 3.0-T MR imaging-comparison with 1.5-T MR imaging Radiology 251 96 104 19221059 10.1148/radiol.2511081265
7. G Engin Cervical cancer 2006 MR imaging findings before, during, and after radiation therapy Eur Radiol 16 313 324 16425027 10.1007/s00330-005-2804-z (Pubitemid 43149630)
8. Y Liu R Bai H Sun H Liu X Zhao Y Li 2009 Diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting and monitoring the response of uterine cervical cancer to combined chemoradiation Clin Radiol 64 1067 1074 19822239 10.1016/j.crad.2009.07.010 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MnosFOrtA%3D%3D
9. MA Haider M Patlas K Jhaveri W Chapman A Fyles B Rosen 2006 Adenocarcinoma involving the uterine cervix: magnetic resonance imaging findings in tumours of endometrial, compared with cervical, origin Can Assoc Radiol J 57 43 48 16719212 (Pubitemid 43793312)
10. L Van Hoe D Vanbeckevoort R Oyen U Itzlinger I Vergote 1999 Cervical carcinoma: optimized local staging with intravaginal contrast-enhanced MR imaging-preliminary results Radiology 213 608 611 10551250 (Pubitemid 29510617)
11. MA Haider I Sitartchouk TP Roberts A Fyles AT Hashmi M Milosevic 2007 Correlations between dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived measures of tumour microvasculature and interstitial fluid pressure in patients with cervical cancer J Magn Reson Imaging 25 153 159 17173303 10.1002/jmri.20795 (Pubitemid 46095210)
12. H Hricak KK Yu CB Powell LL Subak J Stem RL Arenson 1996 Comparison of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of stage Ib carcinoma of the cervix Acad Radiol 3 Suppl 1 S44 S46 8796509 10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80479-X
13. NM deSouza R Dina GA McIndoe WP Soutter 2006 Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension Gynecol Oncol 102 80 85 16427688 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.038 (Pubitemid 44183745)
14. AG Rockall S Ghosh F Alexander-Sefre S Babar MT Younis S Naz, et al. 2006 Can MRI rule out bladder and rectal invasion in cervical cancer to help select patients for limited EUA? Gynecol Oncol 101 244 249 16310245 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.10.012 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283nt1ersA%3D%3D
15. PB Van Vierzen LF Massuger SH Ruys JO Barentsz 1998 Fast dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of cervical carcinoma Clin Radiol 53 183 192 9528868 10.1016/S0009-9260(98)80098-6 (Pubitemid 28118770)
16. K Kinkel M Ariche AA Tardivon A Spatz D Castaigne C Lhomme, et al. 1997 Differentiation between recurrent tumour and benign conditions after treatment of gynecologic pelvic carcinoma: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging Radiology 204 55 63 9205223 1:STN:280:DyaK2szkvFaiuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27281709)
17. H Hricak C Gatsonis DS Chi MA Amendola K Brandt LH Schwartz, et al. 2005 Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183 J Clin Oncol 23 9329 9337 16361632 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.0354
18. TM Keller SC Michel J Frohlich D Fink R Caduff B Marincek, et al. 2004 USPIO-enhanced MRI for preoperative staging of gynecological pelvic tumours: preliminary results Eur Radiol 14 937 944 10.1007/s00330-004-2258-8 (Pubitemid 38787234)
19. SH Choi SH Kim HJ Choi BK Park HJ Lee 2004 Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: results of prospective study J Comput Assist Tomogr 28 620 627 15480035 10.1097/01.rct.0000138007. 77725.0a (Pubitemid 39195536)
20. D Akata U Kerimoglu T Hazirolan M Karcaaltincaba F Kose MN Ozmen, et al. 2005 Efficacy of transvaginal contrast-enhanced MRI in the early staging of cervical carcinoma Eur Radiol 15 1727 1733 16034642 10.1007/s00330-005-2645-9 (Pubitemid 41102371)
21. K Hancke V Heilmann P Straka R Kreienberg C Kurzeder 2008 Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients Ann Surg Oncol 15 2856 2861 18696156 10.1245/s10434-008-0088-7
22. C Messiou VA Morgan SS De Silva TE Ind NM deSouza 2009 Diffusion weighted imaging of the uterus: regional ADC variation with oral contraceptive usage and comparison with cervical cancer Acta Radiol 50 696 701 19449230 10.1080/02841850902926473
23. EM Charles-Edwards C Messiou VA Morgan SS De Silva NA McWhinney M Katesmark, et al. 2008 Diffusion-weighted imaging in cervical cancer with an endovaginal technique: potential value for improving tumour detection in stage Ia and Ib1 disease Radiology 249 541 550 18936313 10.1148/radiol.2491072165
24. VN Harry SI Semple FJ Gilbert DE Parkin 2008 Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the early detection of response to chemoradiation in cervical cancer Gynecol Oncol 111 213 220 18774597 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.048
25. CS Whittaker A Coady L Culver G Rustin M Padwick AR Padhani 2009 Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of female pelvic tumours: a pictorial review Radiographics 29 759 774 19448114 10.1148/rg.293085130 discussion 74-8
26. S Naganawa C Sato H Kumada T Ishigaki S Miura O Takizawa 2005 Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix Eur Radiol. 15 71 78 15538578 10.1007/s00330-004-2529-4 (Pubitemid 40109773)
27. PZ McVeigh AM Syed M Milosevic A Fyles MA Haider 2008 Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer Eur Radiol. 18 1058 1064 18193428 10.1007/s00330-007- 0843-3
28. SO Park JK Kim KA Kim BW Park N Kim G Cho, et al. 2009 Relative apparent diffusion coefficient: determination of reference site and validation of benefit for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in uterine cervical cancer J Magn Reson Imaging 29 383 390 19161191 10.1002/jmri.21635
29. HD Xue S Li F Sun HY Sun ZY Jin JX Yang, et al. 2008 Clinical application of body diffusion weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis and preoperative N staging of cervical cancer Chin Med Sci J 23 133 137 18853846 10.1016/S1001-9294(09)60027-4
30. M Torashima Y Yamashita Y Hatanaka M Takahashi K Miyazaki H Okamura 1997 Invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: MR imaging Comput Med Imaging Graph 21 253 260 10.1016/S0895-6111(97)00007-4 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fmtlygsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27500527)
31. PF Liu GP Krestin RA Huch SC Gohde RF Caduff JF Debatin 1998 MRI of the uterus, uterine cervix, and vagina: diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar gradient-echo imaging in comparison with fast spin-echo T2-weighted pulse imaging Eur Radiol 8 1433 1440 9853231 10.1007/s003300050569 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FntVensQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 128662811)
32. MH Sheu CY Chang JH Wang MS Yen 2001 Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls Eur Radiol 11 1828 1833 11511909 10.1007/s003300000774 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3Mvms1Gjsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32821394)
33. JC Dimopoulos C Kirisits P Petric P Georg S Lang D Berger, et al. 2006 The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: clinical feasibility and preliminary results Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 83 90 16839702 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.041 (Pubitemid 44175668)
34. G Ferrandina M Distefano M Ludovisi A Morganti D Smaniotto G D'Agostino, et al. 2007 Lymph node involvement in locally advanced cervical cancer patients administered preoperative chemoradiation versus chemotherapy Ann Surg Oncol 14 1129 1135 17206484 10.1245/s10434-006-9252-0
35. K Narayan AF McKenzie RJ Hicks R Fisher D Bernshaw S Bau 2003 Relation between FIGO stage, primary tumour volume, and presence of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients referred for radiotherapy Int J Gynecol Cancer 13 657 663 14675351 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13026.x 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3srpsVeqsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38222609)
36. H Hawighorst 1999 Dynamic MR imaging in cervical carcinoma Radiology 213 617 618 10551252 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FhvV2nuw%3D%3D
37. J Scheidler H Hricak KK Yu L Subak MR Segal 1997 Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis JAMA 278 1096 1101 9315770 10.1001/jama.278.13.1096 1:STN:280:DyaK2svlvFyisg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27418338)
38. PV Pandharipande G Choy MG del Carmen GS Gazelle AH Russell SI Lee 2009 MRI and PET/CT for triaging stage IB clinically operable cervical cancer to appropriate therapy: decision analysis to assess patient outcomes AJR Am J Roentgenol 192 802 814 19234280 10.2214/AJR.08.1224
39. DG Mitchell B Snyder F Coakley C Reinhold G Thomas MA Amendola, et al. 2009 Early invasive cervical cancer: MRI and CT predictors of lymphatic metastases in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 intergroup study Gynecol Oncol 112 95 103 19019414 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.005
40. M Jimenez de la Pena M de Vega V Fernandez M Recio Rodriguez J Carrascoso Arranz L Herraiz Hidalgo E Alvarez Moreno 2008 Current imaging modalities in the diagnosis of cervical cancer Gynecol Oncol 110 S49 S54 18672276 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.030
41. C Haie-Meder B Fervers J Chauvergne E Fondrinier C Lhomme A Bataillard, et al. 2000 Radiochimiothérapie concomitante dans les cancers du col de l'utérus : analyse critique des données et mise a jour des Standards, Options et Recommandations Cancer Radiother 4 60 75 10742810 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3gslaisQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30143571)
42. QY Gong JN Brunt CS Romaniuk JP Oakley LT Tan N Roberts, et al. 1999 Contrast enhanced dynamic MRI of cervical carcinoma during radiotherapy: early prediction of tumour regression rate Br J Radiol 72 1177 1184 10703475 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7mvVWhsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30028931)
43. M Plante M Roy 2006 Fertility-preserving options for cervical cancer Oncology 20 479 488 16739746 discussion 491-3 (Pubitemid 46940181)