Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: Evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression

Radiology

Volumn 206, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 125-129

  Scheidler, Juergen ^a   Heuck, Andreas F ^a   Steinborn, Marc ^a   Kimmig, Rainer ^a   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Gadolinium; Uterine neoplasms, MR; Uterine neoplasms, staging; Uterus, MR

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERUS CANCER;

EID: 0031931666     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.206.1.9423661     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T. Cancer statistics, 1992. CA Cancer J Clin 1992; 42:19-38. [Erratum. CA Cancer J Clin 1992; 42:127-128.]
2. Lagasse LD, Creasman WT, Shingleton HM, Blessing JA. Results and complications of operative staging in cervical cancer: experience of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 1980; 9:90-98.
3. van Nagell JR Jr, Roddick JW Jr, Lowin DM. The staging of cervical cancer: inevitable discrepancies between clinical staging and pathological findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971; 110:973-978.
4. Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandles LG, Chang YC, Winkler ML, Stern JL. Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology 1988; 166:623-631.
5. Kim SH, Choi BI, Lee HP, et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings. Radiology 1990; 175:45-51.
6. Kim SH, Choi BI, Han JK, et al. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:633-640.
7. Subak LL, Hricak H, Powell CB, Azizi L, Stern JL. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86:43-50.
8. Semelka RC, Lawrence PH, Shoenut JP, Heywood M, Kroeker MA, Lotocki R. Primary ovarian cancer: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced CT and pre- and postcontrast, fat-suppressed MR imaging, with histologic correlation. JMRI 1993; 3:99-106.
9. Okizuka H, Sugimura K, Yoshizako T, Kaji Y, Wada A. Rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of conventional and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced fat-suppressed MR imaging. JMRI 1996; 6:465-471.
10. Bartolozzi C, Caramella D, Zampa V, et al. MR imaging with STIR technique and air insufflation for local staging of bladder neoplasms. Acta Radiol 1992; 33:577-581.
11. Masuko E, Homma H, Mezawa S, Matsuyama T, Watanabe N, Niitsu Y. Determining depth of invasion of advanced colorectal cancer using MRI short inversion time inversion recovery sequences. J Gastroenterol 1996; 31:361-365.
12. Gauger J, Holzknecht NG, Lackerbauer CA, et al. Breathhold imaging of the upper abdomen using a cp-array coil: comparison with standard body coil imaging. MAGMA 1996; 4:93-104.
13. Manabe A. Multi-angle projection shim (MAPshim) for localized volumes (abstr). In: Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkely, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1995; 696.
14. Dwyer AJ. Matchmaking and McNemar in the comparison of diagnostic modalities. Radiology 1991; 178:328-330.
15. Montana GS, Hanlon AL, Brickner TJ, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: patterns of care studies - review of 1978, 1983, and 1988-1989 surveys. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 32:1481-1486.
16. Russell AH, Shingleton HM, Jones WB, et al. Diagnostic assessments in patients with invasive cancer of the cervix: a national patterns of care study of the American College of Surgeons. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 63:159-165.
17. Hricak H, Hamm B, Semelka RC, et al. Carcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 181:95-106.
18. Sironi S, De Cobelli F, Scarfone G, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness. Radiology 1993; 188:797-801.
19. Postema S, Peters LA, Hermans J, Trimbos JB, Pattynama PM. Cervical carcinoma: do fast SE and fat suppression techniques improve MR tumor staging at 0.5 T? J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:807-811.
20. Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Sawada T, Miyazaki K, Okamura H. Carcinoma of the cervix: dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 182:643-648.
21. Kaji Y, Sugimura K, Kitao M, Ishida T. Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18: 785-792.
22. Milestone BN, Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE, Kressel HY. Cervical carcinoma: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. Radiology 1991; 180:91-95.
23. deSouza NM, Hawley IC, Schwieso JE, Gilderdale DJ, Soutter WP. The uterine cervix on in vitro and in vivo MR images: a study of zonal anatomy and vascularity using an enveloping cervical coil. AJR 1994; 163:607-612.
24. Heuck A, Sittek H, Seelos K, Kreft B, Hermanns M, Reiser M. MRI of the female pelvis: turbo-spin-echo (TSE) sequences compared to conventional spin-echo sequences at 0.5 Tesla. ROFO 1994; 160:538-545.
25. Bydder GM, Pennock JM, Steiner RE, Khenia S, Payne JA, Young IR. The short TI inversion recovery sequence: an approach to MR imaging of the abdomen. Magn Reson Imaging 1985; 3:251-254.
26. Shuman WP, Baron RL, Peters MJ, Tazioli PK. Comparison of STIR and spin-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T in 90 lesions of the chest, liver, and pelvis. AJR 1989; 152:853-859.
27. Lien HH, Blomlie V, Iversen T, Trope C, Sundfor K, Abeler VM. Clinical stage I carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in determining invasion into the parametrium. Acta Radiol 1993; 34:130-132.