Correlation between MRI and histopathologic findings in stage I cervical carcinomas: Influence of stromal desmoplastic reaction

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 610-614

  Itoh, K ^a   Shiozawa, T ^a   Ohira, S ^a   Shiohara, S ^a   Konishi, I ^a  

^a SHINSHU UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cervical carcinoma; Desmoplastic reaction; Diagnosis; MRI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DESMOPLASTIC REACTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROMA; TISSUE REACTION; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, ADENOID CYSTIC; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33646026720     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: 15251438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00383.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Krivak TC McBroom JW Elkas JC Cervical and vaginal cancer In Berek JS ed Novak's gynecology 13th edn Philadelphia, PA Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2002 1199 206
2. Togashi K Nishimura K Sagoh T et al Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging Radiology 1989 171 245 51
3. Hricak H Lacey CG Sandles LG Chang YC Winkler ML Stern JL Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings Radiology 1988 166 623 31
4. Hricak H Hamm B Semelka RC et al Carcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging Radiology 1991 181 95 106
5. Sironi S Belloni C Taccagni GL DelMaschio A Carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991 156 753 6
6. Menell JH Chi DS Hann LE Hricak H The use of MRI in the diagnosis and management of a bulky cervical carcinoma Gynecol Oncol 2003 89 517 21
7. Sheu M Chang C Wang J Yen M MR staging of clinical stage I and IIa cervical carcinoma: a reappraisal of efficacy and pitfalls Eur J Radiol 2001 38 225 31
8. Tsuda K Murakami T Kurachi H et al MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: comparison among T2-weighted, dynamic, and postcontrast T1-weighted images with histopathological correlation Abdom Imaging 1997 22 103 7
9. Wright TC Ferenczy A Kurman RJ Carcinoma and other tumors of the cervix In Kurman RJ ed Blaustein's pathology 5th edn New York Springer-Verlag 2001 325 41
10. Fujiwara K Yoden E Asakawa T et al Negative MRI findings with invasive cervical biopsy may indicate stage IA cervical carcinoma Gynecol Oncol 2000 79 451 6
11. Seki H Azumi R Kimura M Sakai K Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997 168 1579 85
12. Angel C Beecham JB Rubens DJ Thornbury JR Stoler MH Magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic correlation in stage IB cervix cancers Gynecol Oncol 1987 27 357 67
13. Rubens D Thornbury JR Angel C et al Stage IB cervical carcinoma: comparison of clinical, MR, and pathologic staging AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988 150 135 8
14. Lien HH Blomlie V Kjorstad K Abeler V Kaalhus O Clinical stage I carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in determining degree of invasiveness AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991 156 1191 4
15. Innocenti P Fiumicelli D Agostini S et al Magnetic resonance imaging in the measurement of clinical stage IB cervical carcinoma Eur J Radiol 1996 23 222 7
16. Hatano K Sekiya Y Araki H et al Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy on cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999 45 639 44
17. Togashi K MRI of the female pelvis Tokyo, Japan Igaku-Shoin 1994 1 5
18. Yamashita Y Baba T Baba Y Nishimura R Ikeda S Takahashi M Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of uterine cervical cancer: pharmacokinetic analysis with histopathologic correlation and its importance in predicting the outcome of radiation therapy Radiology 2000 216 803 9