Cervical cancer: Value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 80-85

  deSouza, Nandita M ^a   Dina, Roberto ^a   McIndoe, G Angus ^a   Soutter, W Patrick ^a,b  

^a HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Endovaginal imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Trachelectomy; Tumor staging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEVICE; FEMALE; FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; TUMOR VOLUME; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX DISEASE; BIOPSY; HYSTERECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33745965952     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.038     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Togashi K., Morikawa K., Kataoka M.L., et al. Cervical cancer. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 8 (1998) 391-397
2. Boss E.A., Barentsz J.O., Massuger L.F., et al. The role of MR imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma. Eur. Radiol. 10 (2000) 256-270
3. Choi S.H., Kim S.H., Choi H.J., et al. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: results of prospective study. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 28 (2004) 620-627
4. de Souza N.M., Scoones D.J., and Krausz T. High-resolution MR imaging of stage I cervical neoplasia, using a dedicated endovaginal coil: MR features and correlation of imaging and pathologic findings. Am. J. Roentgenol. 166 (1996) 553-559
5. de Souza N.M., Whittle M., Williams A.D., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the primary site in Stage I cervical carcinoma: a comparison of endovaginal and external phased array techniques at 0.5-T. JMRI 12 (2000) 1020-1026
6. Kaji Y., Sugimura K., Kitao M., et al. Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 18 (1994) 785-792
7. Preidler K.W., Tamussino K., Szolar D.M., et al. Staging of cervical carcinomas. Comparison of body-coil magnetic resonance imaging and endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging with histopathologic correlation. Invest. Radiol. 31 (1996) 458-462
8. deSouza N.M., McIndoe G.A.J., Hughes C., et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging with an endovaginal receiver coil in the preoperative assessment of Stage I and IIa cervical neoplasia. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 105 (1999) 500-507
9. Hawnaur J.M., Johnson R.J., Buckley C.H., et al. Staging, volume estimation and assessment of nodal status in carcinoma of the cervix: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with surgical findings. Clin. Radiol. 49 (2000) 443-452
10. Soutter W.P., Hanoch J., Gornall R.J., et al. Pre-treatment tumor volume in cervical cancer as a predictor of survival: assessment using endovaginal and external coil magnetic resonance imaging. BJOG 111 (2004) 741-747
11. Chen A.C., Sung W.H., Wang P.H., et al. Correlation of three-dimensional tumor volumetry with cervical cancer prognostic parameters. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 23 (2002) 401-404
12. Wagenaar H.C., Trimbos J.B., Postema S., et al. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 82 (2001) 474-482
13. Ozsarlak O., Tjalma W., Schepens E., et al. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. Eur. Radiol. 13 (2003) 2338-2345
14. Narayan K., McKenzie A., Fisher R., et al. Estimation of tumor volume in cervical cancer by magnetic resonance imaging. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 26 (2003) 163-168
15. Plante M., Renaud M.C., Francois H., and Roy M. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol. Oncol. 94 (2004) 614-623
16. Ungar L., Palfalvi L., Hogg R., Siklos P., Boyle D.C., Del P.G., and Smith J.R. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: a fertility-preserving option for women with early cervical cancer. BJOG 112 (2005) 366-369
17. Mahon M.M., Williams A.D., Soutter W.P., et al. 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of invasive cervical cancer: an in vivo study with ex vivo corroboration. NMR Biomed. 17 (2004) 1-9
18. Kim M.J., Chung J.J., Lee Y.H., et al. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma. Am. J. Roentgenol. 168 (1997) 1215-1221
19. Wang L.J., Wong Y.C., Chen C.J., et al. Cervical carcinoma: MR imaging with integrated endorectal/phased-array coils: a pilot study. Eur. Radiol. 11 (2001) 1822-1827
20. Bipat S., Glas A.S., van der Velden J., Zwinderman A.H., et al. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol. Oncol. 91 (2003) 59-66