Constraint-induced movement therapy: Some thoughts about theories and evidence

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Supplement

Volumn , Issue 41, 2003, Pages 41-45

  Van Der Lee, Johanna H ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arm; Cerebrovascular accident; Constraint induced movement therapy; Review literature; Somatosensory disorders; Stroke; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ARM; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVARIANCE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXPERIMENT; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; IMMOBILIZATION; LEARNING; MONKEY; MOVEMENT THERAPY; NEGLECT; NONHUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; SOMATOSENSORY DISORDER; STROKE; THEORY;

ARM; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; EXERCISE THERAPY; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; MOTOR CORTEX; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; SENSATION DISORDERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80052723907     PISSN: 16501969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti RD. Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - A clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999; 36: 237-251.
2. Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. In: Keogh JF, ed. Exercise and Sports Sciences Reviews. Santa Barbara: Journal Publishing Affiliates, 1977, p. 335-374.
3. Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint-induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 1997; 3: 38-61.
4. Andrews K, Stewart J. Stroke recovery: He can but does he? Rheumatol Rehabil 1979; 18: 43-48.
5. Van Der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Devillé WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: Results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999; 30: 2369-2375.
6. Ostendorf CG, Wolf SL. Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. A single-case design. Phys Ther 1981; 61: 1022-1028.
7. Wolf SL, Lecraw E, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989; 104: 125-132.
8. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW III, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1993; 74: 347-354.
9. Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, Groomes TE, Cook EW III, DeLuca SC, et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: Overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav 1994; 61: 281-293.
10. Taub E, Crago JE, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabil Psych 1998; 43: 152-170.
11. Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther 1999; 79: 847-853.
12. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, Villringer K, Villringer A, Taub E, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1999; 80: 624-628.
13. Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication. Stroke 1999; 30: 586-592.
14. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke 2000; 31: 2984-2988.
15. Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, Keller P, Chakeres DW. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80: 4-12.
16. Taub E, Morris DM. Constraint-induced movement therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2001; 3: 279-286.
17. Page SJ, Sisto S, Johnston MV, Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: A preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 290-295.
18. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology. A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine. 2 edn. Boston/Toronto/London: Little, Brown and Company, 1995.
19. Van Der Lee JH, Snels IAK, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Wagenaar RC, Bouter LM. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehab 2001; 15: 20-31.
20. Van Der Lee JH. Constraint-induced therapy for stroke: More of the same or something completely different? Curr Opin Neurol 2001; 14: 741-744.
21. Kozlowski DA, James DC, Schallert T. Use-dependent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 4776-4786.
22. Matyas TA, Ottenbacher KJ. Confounds of insensitivity and blind luck: Statistical conclusion validity in stroke rehabilitation clinical trials. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1993; 74: 559-565.
23. Langhorne P, Wagenaar RC, Partridge CJ. Physiotherapy after stroke: More is better? Physiother Res Int 1996; 1: 75-88.
24. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke 1997; 28: 1550-1556.
25. Duncan PW. Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Topics Stroke Rehabil 1997; 3: 1-20.
26. Richards L, Pohl P. Therapeutic interventions to improve upper extremity recovery and function. Clin Geriatr Med 1999; 15: 819-832.
27. Van Der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. Constraint-induced movement therapy [Letter to the Editor]. Phys Ther 2000; 80: 711-712.
28. Rosenthal R. Parametric measures of effect size. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, eds. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York. Russell Sage Foundation; 1994, p. 231-244.
29. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Laupacis A, Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 1992; 102 (Supplement): 305S-311S.
30. Van Der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of the Action Research Arm test: A practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2001; 82: 14-19.
31. Oxman AD. Checklists for review articles. BMJ 1994; 309: 648-651.
32. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: Implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, ed. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1980, p. 371.
33. Monane M, Kanter DS, Glynn RJ, Avorn J. Variability in length of hospitalization for stroke. The role of managed care in an elderly population. Arch Neurol 1996; 53: 875-880.
34. Retchin SM, Brown RS, Yeh SC, Chu D, Moreno L. Outcomes of stroke patients in Medicare fee for service and managed care. JAMA 1997; 278: 119-124.