Amplitude modulation and loudness in cochlear implantees

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 101-111

  McKay, Colette M ^a,b   Henshall, Katherine R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electrical stimulation; Loudness model; Temporal modulation

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOUDNESS; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NOISE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 77149127700     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0188-5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. PA Busby YC Tong GM Clark 1993 The perception of temporal modulations by cochlear implant patients J Acoust Soc Am 94 124 131 10.1121/1.408212 1:STN:280:DyaK3szlvFGksQ%3D%3D 8354754
2. Y Cazals M Pelizzone O Saudan C Boex 1994 Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants J Acoust Soc Am 96 2048 2054 10.1121/1.410146 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2Flt1SmsQ%3D%3D 7963020 (Pubitemid 24311632)
3. M Chatterjee 1999 Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants J Acoust Soc Am 105 850 860 10.1121/1.426274 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7jvVGitQ%3D%3D 9972570 (Pubitemid 29061318)
4. M Chatterjee SI Oba 2005 Noise improves modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners at moderate carrier levels J Acoust Soc Am 118 993 1002 10.1121/1.1929258 16158655 (Pubitemid 41129234)
5. M Chatterjee ME Robert 2001 Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system? J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2 159 171 10.1007/s101620010079 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MrgtFansQ%3D%3D 11550525 (Pubitemid 32622737)
6. QJ Fu 2002 Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users Neuroreport 13 1635 1639 10.1097/00001756-200209160-00013 12352617
7. JJ Galvin 3rd QJ Fu 2005 Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 6 269 279 10.1007/s10162-005-0007-6 16075190
8. JJ Galvin 3rd QJ Fu 2009 Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users Hear Res 250 46 54 10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.009 19450432
9. HA Kreft GS Donaldson DA Nelson 2004 Effects of pulse rate and electrode array design on intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users J Acoust Soc Am 116 2258 2268 10.1121/1.1786871 15532657 (Pubitemid 39391628)
10. HJ Mcdermott CM Mckay LM Richardson KR Henshall 2003 Application of loudness models to sound processing for cochlear implants J Acoust Soc Am 114 2190 2197 10.1121/1.1612488 14587616 (Pubitemid 37266644)
11. HJ Mcdermott CM Sucher CM Mckay 2004 Speech perception with a cochlear implant sound processor incorporating loudness models Acoust Res Lett Online 6 7 13 10.1121/1.1809152
12. CM Mckay HJ Mcdermott 1998 Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals J Acoust Soc Am 104 1061 1074 10.1121/1.423316 1:STN:280:DyaK1czotVKmtQ%3D%3D 9714925 (Pubitemid 28373192)
13. CM Mckay HJ Mcdermott 1999 The perceptual effects of current pulse duration in electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve J Acoust Soc Am 106 998 1009 10.1121/1.428052 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzpt1Sltg%3D%3D 10462805 (Pubitemid 29379527)
14. CM Mckay MD Remine HJ Mcdermott 2001 Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation J Acoust Soc Am 110 1514 1524 10.1121/1.1394222 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrisV2hsg%3D%3D 11572362 (Pubitemid 32834896)
15. CM Mckay KR Henshall RJ Farrell HJ Mcdermott 2003 A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli J Acoust Soc Am 113 2054 2063 10.1121/1.1558378 12703716 (Pubitemid 36389944)
16. DA Nelson JL Schmitz GS Donaldson NF Viemeister E Javel 1996 Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation J Acoust Soc Am 100 2393 2414 10.1121/1.417949 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FhvFSgsg%3D%3D 8865646 (Pubitemid 26340008)
17. BE Pfingst L Xu CS Thompson 2007 Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants J Acoust Soc Am 121 2236 2246 10.1121/1.2537501 17471737 (Pubitemid 46548423)
18. RV Shannon 1985 Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants Hear Res 18 135 143 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90005- X 1:STN:280:DyaL28%2FgslyltQ%3D%3D 3840159 (Pubitemid 15003787)
19. RV Shannon 1992 Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants J Acoust Soc Am 91 2156 2164 10.1121/1.403807 1:STN:280:DyaK383osVSkug%3D%3D 1597606
20. NF Viemeister GH Wakefield 1991 Temporal integration and multiple looks J Acoust Soc Am 90 858 865 10.1121/1.401953 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FktlSqsA%3D%3D 1939890
21. FG Zeng RV Shannon 1994 Loudness-coding mechanisms inferred from electric stimulation of the human auditory system Science 264 564 566 10.1126/science.8160013 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3ht1Wluw%3D%3D 8160013
22. FG Zeng RV Shannon 1995 Loudness of simple and complex stimuli in electric hearing Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166 235 238 1:STN:280: DyaK2MzpvVagtg%3D%3D 7668651
23. C Zhang FG Zeng 1997 Loudness of dynamic stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing J Acoust Soc Am 102 2925 2934 10.1121/1.420347 1:STN:280: DyaK1c%2FktFemtQ%3D%3D 9373979 (Pubitemid 27486270)