Supraglottic airway devices;Atemwegsmanagement: Supraglottische Atemwegshilfen

Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 598-607

  Bein, Berthold ^a   Francksen, Helga ^a   Steinfath, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

airway device; laryngeal mask airway; laryngeal tube; routine anaesthesia

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; DRAIN; LARYNGEAL MASK; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; RESPIRATION CONTROL; SURGICAL DRAINAGE;

AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA; GLOTTIS; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; OBESITY; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY ASPIRATION;

EID: 80052471682     PISSN: 09392661     EISSN: 14391074     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1286612     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The Elisha airway device: supraglottic and infraglottic, or simply extraglottic? Anesth Analg author reply: 2005; 100
2. McIntyre JW. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal airways: I (1880-1995). Can J Anaesth: 1996; 43 629 635 (Pubitemid 126785041)
3. Charters P. Airway devices: where now and where to? Br J Anaesth: 2000; 85 504 505
4. Brain AI. The development of the Laryngeal Mask a brief history of the invention, early clinical studies and experimental work from which the Laryngeal Mask evolved. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl: 1991; 4 5 17
5. Brain AI. The laryngeal mask a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth: 1983; 55 801 805 (Pubitemid 13035618)
6. Nakayama S, Osaka Y, Yamashita M. The rotational technique with a partially inflated laryngeal mask airway improves the ease of insertion in children. Paediatr Anaesth: 2002; 12 416 419 (Pubitemid 34639462)
7. Brimacombe J. Analysis of 1500 laryngeal mask uses by one anaesthetist in adults undergoing routine anaesthesia. Anaesthesia: 1996; 51 76 80 (Pubitemid 26111717)
8. Verghese C, Brimacombe JR. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage. Anesth Analg: 1996; 82 129 133 (Pubitemid 26017393)
9. Kihara S, Yaguchi Y, Brimacombe J et al. Intubating laryngeal mask airway size selection: a randomized triple crossover study in paralyzed, anesthetized male and female adult patients. Anesth Analg table of contents: 2002; 94
10. Asai T, Kawashima A, Hidaka I, Kawachi S. The laryngeal tube compared with the laryngeal mask: insertion, gas leak pressure and gastric insufflation. Br J Anaesth: 2002; 89 729 732 (Pubitemid 35277222)
11. Bein B, Carstensen S, Gleim M et al. A comparison of the proseal laryngeal mask airway, the laryngeal tube S and the oesophageal-tracheal combitube during routine surgical procedures. Eur J Anaesthesiol: 2005; 22 341 346 (Pubitemid 40676788)
12. Matioc AA, Arndt G. The laryngeal tube and pharyngeal mucosal pressure. Can J Anaesth author reply: 2003; 50
13. Heuer JF, Stiller M, Rathgeber J et al. Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway devices Ambu AuraOnce and Intersurgical i-gel. Positioning, sealing, patient comfort and airway morbidity. Anaesthesist: 2009; 58 813 820
14. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Alvarez M. Safety and efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway. A prospective survey of 1400 children. Anaesthesia: 1996; 51 969 972 (Pubitemid 26343537)
15. Brimacombe J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth: 1995; 42 1017 1023
16. Benumof JL. Use of the laryngeal mask airway to facilitate fiberscope-aided tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg: 1992; 74 313 315
17. Oczenski W, Krenn H, Dahaba AA et al. Hemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to insertion of the Combitube, laryngeal mask airway or tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg: 1999; 88 1389 1394 (Pubitemid 29246958)
18. Wood ML, Forrest ET. The haemodynamic response to the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand: 1994; 38 510 513 (Pubitemid 24204473)
19. Joshi GP, Inagaki Y, White PF et al. Use of the laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to the tracheal tube during ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Analg: 1997; 85 573 577 (Pubitemid 27381309)
20. Akhtar TM, McMurray P, Kerr WJ, Kenny GN. A comparison of laryngeal mask airway with tracheal tube for intra-ocular ophthalmic surgery. Anaesthesia: 1992; 47 668 671
21. Macario A, Chang PC, Stempel DB, Brock-Utne JG. A cost analysis of the laryngeal mask airway for elective surgery in adult outpatients. Anesthesiology: 1995; 83 250 257
22. Bilgin H, Bozkurt M. Tracheal intubation using the ILMA, C-Trach or McCoy laryngoscope in patients with simulated cervical spine injury. Anaesthesia: 2006; 61 685 691 (Pubitemid 43871478)
23. Bannon L, Brimacombe J, Nixon T, Keller C. Repeat autoclaving does not remove protein deposits from the classic laryngeal mask airway. Eur J Anaesthesiol: 2005; 22 515 517 (Pubitemid 40992754)
24. Spielman FJ. Complete separation of the tube from the mask during removal of a disposable laryngeal mask airway. Can J Anaesth: 2002; 49 990 992 (Pubitemid 36097615)
25. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Morris R, Mecklem D. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients. Anesth Analg: 1998; 87 921 924 (Pubitemid 28455495)
26. Cao MM, Webb T, Bjorksten AR. Comparison of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways in spontaneously ventilating adult patients. Anaesth Intensive Care: 2004; 32 530 534 (Pubitemid 39172458)
27. Francksen H, Bein B, Cavus E et al. Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures. Eur J Anaesthesiol: 2007; 24 134 140 (Pubitemid 46058450)
28. Van Zundert AA, Fonck K, Al-Shaikh B, Mortier E. Comparison of the LMA-classic with the new disposable soft seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients. Anesthesiology: 2003; 99 1066 1071 (Pubitemid 37339450)
29. Asai T, Shingu K. Time-related cuff pressures of the laryngeal tube with and without the use of nitrous oxide. Anesth Analg table of contents: 2004; 98
30. Dorges V, Ocker H, Wenzel V, Schmucker P. The laryngeal tube: a new simple airway device. Anesth Analg: 2000; 90 1220 1222 (Pubitemid 30253481)
31. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Brimacombe L. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation. Anesth Analg table of contents: 1996; 43
32. Cook TM, McCormick B, Asai T. Randomised comparison of the laryngeal tube and the laryngeal mask during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia: 2003; 58 508 508
33. Cook TM, Cranshaw J. Randomized crossover comparison of ProSeal(R) Laryngeal Mask Airway with Laryngeal Tube Sonda(R) during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth: 2005; 95 261 266 (Pubitemid 41487157)
34. Chiu CL, Murugasu J, Chan L. The use of modified VBM laryngeal tube compared to Laryngeal Mask Airway during spontaneous ventilation. Anaesth Intensive Care: 2003; 31 187 192 (Pubitemid 36503833)
35. Asai T, Murao K, Shingu K. Efficacy of the laryngeal tube during intermittent positive-pressure ventilation. Anaesthesia: 2000; 55 1099 1102
36. Miller DM, Youkhana I, Pearce AC. The laryngeal mask and VBM laryngeal tube compared during spontaneous ventilation. A pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol: 2001; 18 593 598 (Pubitemid 34603800)
37. Wrobel M, Grundmann U, Wilhelm W et al. Laryngeal tube versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetised non-paralysed patients. A comparison of handling and postoperative morbidity. Anaesthesist: 2004; 53 702 708 (Pubitemid 39158704)
38. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Roth W, Loeckinger A. Large cuff volumes impede posterior pharyngeal mucosal perfusion with the laryngeal tube airway. Can J Anaesth: 2002; 49 1084 1087 (Pubitemid 36231111)
39. Figueredo E, Martinez M, Pintanel T. A comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask and the laryngeal tube in spontaneously breathing anesthetized patients. Anesth Analg table of contents: 2003; 96
40. Cook TM, McKinstry C, Hardy R, Twigg S. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the Laryngeal Tube during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth: 2003; 91 678 683 (Pubitemid 37369528)
41. Richebe P, Semjen F, Cros AM, Maurette P. Clinical assessment of the laryngeal tube in pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth: 2005; 15 391 396 (Pubitemid 40559483)
42. Genzwuerker HV, Hohl E, Rapp HJ. Ventilation with the laryngeal tube in pediatric patients undergoing elective ambulatory surgery. Paediatr Anaesth: 2005; 15 385 390 (Pubitemid 40559482)
43. Amini A, Zand F, Sadeghi SE. A comparison of the disposable vs. the reusable laryngeal tube in paralysed adult patients. Anaesthesia: 2007; 62 1167 1170 (Pubitemid 47556417)
44. Wiese CH, Semmel T, Muller JU et al. The use of the laryngeal tube disposable (LT-D) by paramedics during out-of-hospital resuscitation an observational study concerning ERC guidelines 2005. Resuscitation: 2009; 80 194 198
45. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal' a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth: 2000; 84 650 654 (Pubitemid 30229613)
46. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth: 2005; 52 739 760 (Pubitemid 41644171)
47. Howath A, Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum-elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a new technique. Anaesth Intensive Care: 2002; 30 624 627 (Pubitemid 35189864)
48. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Loeckinger A. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Anesth Analg: 2000; 91 1017 1020
49. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C et al. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth: 2002; 88 527 533 (Pubitemid 34285203)
50. Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth: 2008; 101 405 410
51. Lopez AM, Valero R, Hurtado P et al. Comparison of the LMA SupremeTM with the LMA ProsealTM for airway management in patients anaesthetized in prone position. Br J Anaesth 10.1093/bja/aer104: 2011
52. Tham HM, Tan SM, Woon KL, Zhao YD. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study. Can J Anaesth: 2010; 57 672 678
53. Chew EE, Hashim NH, Wang CY. Randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme with the I-Gel in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesth Intensive Care: 2010; 38 1018 1022
54. Francksen H, Renner J, Hanss R et al. A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA-Unique in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesthesia: 2009; 64 1118 1124
55. Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D et al. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology: 2009; 111 55 62
56. Weber U, Oguz R, Potura LA et al. Comparison of the i-gel and the LMA-Unique laryngeal mask airway in patients with mild to moderate obesity during elective short-term surgery. Anaesthesia 481 487
57. Shin WJ, Cheong YS, Yang HS, Nishiyama T. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol: 2010; 27 598 601
58. Singh I, Gupta M, Tandon M. Comparison of Clinical Performance of I-Gel with LMA-Proseal in Elective Surgeries. Indian journal of anaesthesia: 2009; 53 302 305
59. Teoh WHL, Lee KM, Suhitharan T et al. Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs. the i-gel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia: 2010; 65 1173 1179
60. Schmidbauer W, Bercker S, Volk T et al. Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model. Br J Anaesth: 2009; 102 135 139
61. Gibbison B, Cook TM, Seller C. Case series: Protection from aspiration and failure of protection from aspiration with the i-gel airway. Br J Anaesth: 2008; 100 415 417 (Pubitemid 351773645)
62. Doerges V, Ocker H, Wenzel V et al. The Laryngeal Tube S: A Modified Simple Airway Device. Anesth Analg: 2003; 96 618 621 (Pubitemid 36125792)
63. Roth H, Genzwuerker HV, Rothhaas A et al. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube Suction for ventilation in gynaecological patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol: 2005; 22 117 122 (Pubitemid 40488644)
64. Gaitini LA, Vaida SJ, Somri M et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with the Laryngeal Tube Suction in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology: 2004; 101 316 320 (Pubitemid 38988486)
65. Miller DM, Light D. Storage capacities of the laryngeal mask and laryngeal tube compared and their relevance to aspiration risk during positive pressure ventilation. Anesth Analg table of contents: 2003; 96
66. Thee C, Serocki G, Doerges V et al. Laryngeal tube S II, laryngeal tube S disposable, Fastrach laryngeal mask and Fastrach laryngeal mask disposable during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison between reusable and disposable supraglottic airway devices. Eur J Anaesthesiol: 2010; 27 468 472
67. Abdi W, Dhonneur G, Amathieu R et al. LMA supreme versus facemask ventilation performed by novices: a comparative study in morbidly obese patients showing difficult ventilation predictors. Obesity surgery: 2009; 19 1624 1630
68. Natalini G, Franceschetti ME, Pantelidi MT et al. Comparison of the standard laryngeal mask airway and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in obese patients. Br J Anaesth: 2003; 90 323 326 (Pubitemid 36304874)
69. Zoremba M, Aust H, Eberhart L et al. Comparison between intubation and the laryngeal mask airway in moderately obese adults. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand: 2009; 53 436 442
70. Bernardini A, Natalini G. Risk of pulmonary aspiration with laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube: analysis on 65712 procedures with positive pressure ventilation. Anaesthesia: 2009; 64 1289 1294
71. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth: 2011; 106 617 631
72. LMA Deutschland: Gebrauchsanweisung PLMA. 2011; 18 18