Randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme™ with the I-Gel™ in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1018-1022

  Chew, E F F ^a   Hashim, N H M ^a   Wang, C Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Fibreoptic; Insertion; Laryngeal mask airway; Lma supreme; Oropharyngeal leak pressure

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; PROPOFOL; SEVOFLURANE;

ACID ASPIRATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AIRWAY; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BREATHING APPARATUS; BRONCHOSPASM; COUGHING; FEMALE; FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; HICCUP; HUMAN; HYPOXIA; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNX SPASM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OROPHARYNGEAL LEAK PRESSURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHARYNX DISEASE; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL RISK; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOMITING;

EID: 78650486443     PISSN: 0310057X     EISSN: 14480271     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x1003800609     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Brain AIJ. The laryngeal mask: a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth 1983; 55:801-805.
2. Americian Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on management of the difficult airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:1269-1277.
3. Cook T, Gatward JJ, Handel J, Hardy R, Thompson C, Srivastava R et al. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme™ in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:555-562.
4. Gatward JJ , Cook TM, Seller C, Handel J, Simpson T, Vanek V et al. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel™ airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:1124-1130.
5. Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Bräuer A, Graf BM et al. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:262-265.
6. Verghese C, Berlet J, Kapila A, Pollard R. Clinical assessment of the single use laryngeal mask airway - the LMA-Unique. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80:677-679.
7. Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme™ - a new singleuse LMA™ with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:405-410.
8. Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A et al. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2009; 111:55-62.
9. Asai T, Muroa K, Yukawa H, Shingu K. Reevaluation of appropriate size of the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83:478-479. (Pubitemid 29412708)
10. Janakiraman C, Chethan DB, Wilkes AR, Stacey MR, Goodwin N. A randomised crossover trial comparing the i-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:674-678.
11. Francksen H, Bein B, Cavus E, Renner J, Scholz J, Steinfath M et al. Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24:134-140.
12. Brimacombe J. Anatomy. In: Laryngeal mask anesthesia. Principles and practice, 2nd ed. London: WB Saunders Compnay 2005. p. 73-104.
13. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Influence of neuromuscular block, mode of ventilation and respiratory cycle on pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83:480-482.