A theoretical and empirical approach in assessing motivational factors: From serious games to an ITS

Proceedings of the 24th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society, FLAIRS - 24

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 513-518

  Derbali, Lotfi ^a   Chalfoun, Pierre ^a   Frasson, Claude ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

EEG attention ratio; Game elements; ITS; Motivational factors; Physiological sensors

Indexed keywords

ARCS MODEL; ATTENTION LEVEL; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; GAME ELEMENTS; HEART RATES; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; ITS; MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS; PHYSIOLOGICAL DATA; PHYSIOLOGICAL SENSORS; SERIOUS GAMES; SKIN CONDUCTANCE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; MOTIVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSORS;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

EID: 80052421909     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Arroyo, I., Ferguson, K., Johns, J., Dragon, T., Mehranian, H., Fisher, D., Barto, A., Mahadevan, S., Woolf, B. 2007. Repairing disengagement with non invasive interventions. In Proc. of AIED. Los Angeles, USA, pp. 195-202.
2. Baker, R.S.J.D., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Evenson, S.E., Roll, I., Wagner, A.Z., Nairn, M., Raspat, J., Baker, D.J., Beck, J. 2006. Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System. In Proc. of ITS. Jhongli, Taiwan, pp. 392-401.
3. Boyer, K., Phillips, R., Wallis, M., Vouk, M., Lester, J. 2008. Balancing Cognitive and Motivational Scaffolding in Tutorial Dialogue. In Proc. of ITS. Montreal, Canada, pp. 239-249.
4. Brogni, A., Vinayagamoorthy, V., Steed, A., Slater, M. 2006. Variations in physiological responses of participants during different stages of an immersive virtual environment experiment. In Proc. of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology. Limassol, Cyprus, pp. 376-382.
5. Conati, C., Maclaren, H. 2009. Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 19, 267-303.
6. de Vicente, A., Pain, H. 2002. Informing the detection of the students' motivational state: an empirical study. In Proc. of ITS. Biarritz, France and San Sebastian, Spain, pp. 933-943.
7. Dempsey, J.V., Johnson, R.B. 1998. The development of an ARCS gaming scale. Instructional Psychology 25, 215-221.
8. Derbali, L., Frasson, C. 2010. Players' Motivation and EEG Waves Patterns in a Serious Game Environment. In Proc. of ITS. Pittsburgh, USA, pp. 297-299.
9. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., Driskell, J.E. 2002. Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming 33, 441-467.
10. Guay, F., Vallerand, R.J., Blanchard, C. 2000. On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The situational motivation scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion 24, 175-213.
11. Gunter, G.A., Kenny, R.F., Vick, E.H. 2006. A case for a formal design paradigm for serious games. International Digital Media & Arts Association 3, 93-105.
12. Huang, W.-H., Huang, W.-Y., Tschopp, J. 2010. Sustaining iterative game playing processes in DGBL: The relationship between motivational processing and outcome processing. Comput. Educ. 55, 789-797.
13. Hung, K.-H., Kinzer, C., Chen, C.-L.A. 2009. Motivational Factors in Educational MMORPGs: Some Implications for Education. In Proc. of the International Conference on E-Learning and Games: Learning by Playing. Game-based Education System Design and Development. Alberta, Canada.
14. Johnson, W.L., Wu, S. 2008. Assessing. Aptitude for Learning with a Serious Game for Foreign Language and Culture. In Proc. of ITS. Montreal, Canada, pp. 520-529.
15. Keller, J.M. 1987. Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Instructional Development 10, 2-10.
16. Lin, T., Imamiya, A., Hu, W., Omata, M. 2007. Display Characteristics Affect Users' Emotional Arousal in 3D Games. Universal Access in Ambient Intelligence Environments, vol. 4397, pp. 337-351. Berlin / Heidelberg.
17. Malone, T.W., Lepper, M.R. 1987. Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning. Aptitude, learning and instruction III: Cognitive and affective process analysis. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 223-253.
18. McNamara, D.S., Jackson, G.T., Graesser, A.C. 2009. Intelligent tutoring and games (iTaG). Workshop on Intelligent Educational Games. AIED. Brighton, UK, pp. 1-10.
19. Prensky, M. 2001. Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw Hill.
20. Putman, P., van Peer, J., Maimari, I., van der Werff, S. 2010. EEG theta/beta ratio in relation to fear-modulated response-inhibition, attentional control, and affective traits. Biological Psychology 83, 73-78.
21. Rebolledo-Mendez, G., de Freitas, S., Rojano-Caceres, R., Gaona-Garcia, A.R. 2010. An empirical examination of the relation between attention and motivation in computer-based education: A modeling approach. FLAIRS. USA, pp. 74-79.
22. Rovai, A.P., Lucking, R. 2003. Sense of community in a higher education television-based distance education program. Educational Technology Research & Development 51, 5-16.
23. Ryan, R.M., Rigby, C., Przybylski, A. 2006. The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation & Emotion 30, 344-360.
24. Williams, M., Robert, L.B. 1997. Psychology for language teachers: a social constructivist approach. New York: Cambridge.
25. Wilson, G.F., Fisher, F. 1995. Cognitive task classification based upon topographic EEG data. Biological Psychology 40, 239-250.