An empirical examination of the relation between attention and motivation in computer-based education: A modeling approach

Proceedings of the 23rd International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-23

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 74-79

  Rebolledo Méndez, Genaro ^a   De Freitas, Sara ^b   Rojano Caceres, Jose Rafael ^a   Garcia Gaona, Alma Rosa ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD VERACRUZANA   (Mexico)

^b Institute for Clean Growth and Future Mobility   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION LEVEL; ATTENTION MODEL; COMPUTER-BASED EDUCATIONS; EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION; LOW LEVEL; MODEL OF ATTENTION; MODELING APPROACH; NEW MODEL; SPECIALIZED EQUIPMENT; VIRTUAL WORLDS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOELECTRIC PHENOMENA; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MOTIVATION; STUDENTS; TEACHING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 77957884286     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. American Psychiatric Association (APA) 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Press.
2. Amershi, S., Conati, C. and McLaren H. 2006. Using Feature Selection and Unsupervised Clustering to Identify Affective Expressions in Educational Games. In Rebolledo-Mendez et al. (Eds) Workshop in Motivational and Affective Issues in ITS, collocated with the eight International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
3. de Vicente, A. and Pain H. 2002. Informing the Detection of the Student's Motivational State: An empirical Study. In Cerri, S.A. et al (Eds), Proceedings of the sixth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 933-943. Springer-Verlag.
4. del Soldato, T. and du Boulay B. 1995. Implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 6: 337-378.
5. Harter, S. 1981 A new self report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology 17(3): 300-312.
6. Keller, J.M. 1983. Motivational Design of Instruction. In Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed) Instructional-Design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 383-434.
7. Keller, J.M. 1987. Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction Journal 26(8): 1-7.
8. Linden, M., Habib, T. and Radojevic, V. 1996. A controlled study of the effects of EEG biofeedback on cognition and behavior of children with attention deficit disorder and learning disabilities. Applied Psychophysiology andBiofeedback 21 (1): 35-49.
9. Manské, M. and C. Conati. 2005. Modelling Learning in an Educational Game. In Chee-Kit, L. et al (Eds.) Proceedings of the twelfth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 411-418. IOS Press.
10. Rebolledo-Mendez, G., B. du Boulay, and R. Luckin. Motivating the learner: an empirical evaluation, in 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. 2006: Springer-Verlag.
11. Rebolledo-Mendez, G. and de Freitas, S. 2008. Attention modeling using inputs from a Brain Computer Interface and user-generated data in Second Life. In Proceedings of AFFINE Workshop co-located with The Tenth International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces.
12. Song, S.H. and Keller, J.M. 2001. Effectiveness of Motivationlly Adaptive Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Dynamic Aspect of Motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development 49(2): 5-22. (Pubitemid 33294788)