Effective stimuli for constructing reliable neuron models

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2011, Pages

  Druckmann, Shaul ^a   Berger, Thomas K ^b   Schürmann, Felix ^b   Hill, Sean ^b   Markram, Henry ^b   Segev, Idan ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICS; NEURAL NETWORKS;

'CURRENT; LEARNING THEORY; MEMBRANE PROPERTIES; NEURON DYNAMICS; NEURON MODELING; NONLINEAR MEMBRANE; PARAMETER SPACES; TECHNICAL CHALLENGES; THEORETICAL STUDY; WAVEFORMS;

NEURONS;

CALCIUM CHANNEL; POTASSIUM CHANNEL;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BRAIN CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; GENETIC ALGORITHM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEMBRANE CHANNEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOUSE; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; NERVE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS MODEL; RAT; RELIABILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STIMULUS RESPONSE; ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; INTERNEURON; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL; PATCH CLAMP; PHYSIOLOGY; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; WISTAR RAT;

ANIMALIA;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; INTERNEURONS; MICE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; PATCH-CLAMP TECHNIQUES; PYRAMIDAL CELLS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR;

EID: 80052319761     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002133     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF, (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117: 500-544.
2. Rall W, Burke RE, Smith TG, Nelson PG, Frank K, (1967) Dendritic location of synapses and possible mechanisms for the monosynaptic EPSP in motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 30: 1169-1193.
3. Rall W, United States. Air Force. Office of Scientific Research., General Precision Inc., editors (1964) Theoretical significance of dendritic trees for neuronal input-output relations. In: Reiss RF, editors. Neural theory and modeling; proceedings of the 1962 Ojai symposium Stanford, Calif. Stanford University Pressviii, 427.
4. Vetter P, Roth A, Hausser M, (2001) Propagation of action potentials in dendrites depends on dendritic morphology. J Neurophysiol 85: 926-937.
5. Roth A, Hausser M, (2001) Compartmental models of rat cerebellar Purkinje cells based on simultaneous somatic and dendritic patch-clamp recordings. J Physiol 535: 445-472.
6. Poirazi P, Brannon T, Mel BW, (2003) Arithmetic of subthreshold synaptic summation in a model CA1 pyramidal cell. Neuron 37: 977-987.
7. Migliore M, Shepherd GM, (2002) Emerging rules for the distributions of active dendritic conductances. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 362-370.
8. Koch C, Segev I, (1998) Methods in neuronal modeling: from ions to networks Cambridge, Mass. MIT Pressxiii, 671.
9. Koch C, Segev I, (2000) The role of single neurons in information processing. Nat Neurosci 3 (Suppl): 1171-1177.
10. Segev I, London M, (2000) Untangling dendrites with quantitative models. Science 290: 744-750.
11. Bekkers JM, Hausser M, (2007) Targeted dendrotomy reveals active and passive contributions of the dendritic tree to synaptic integration and neuronal output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 11447-11452.
12. Nicholson DA, Trana R, Katz Y, Kath WL, Spruston N, et al. (2006) Distance-dependent differences in synapse number and AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Neuron 50: 431-442.
13. Clark BA, Monsivais P, Branco T, London M, Hausser M, (2005) The site of action potential initiation in cerebellar Purkinje neurons. Nat Neurosci 8: 137-139.
14. Nevian T, Larkum ME, Polsky A, Schiller J, (2007) Properties of basal dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons: a direct patch-clamp recording study. Nat Neurosci 10: 206-214.
15. Prinz AA, Bucher D, Marder E, (2004) Similar network activity from disparate circuit parameters. Nat Neurosci 7: 1345-1352.
16. London M, Hausser M, (2005) Dendritic computation. Annu Rev Neurosci 28: 503-532.
17. Jarsky T, Roxin A, Kath WL, Spruston N, (2005) Conditional dendritic spike propagation following distal synaptic activation of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Nat Neurosci 8: 1667-1676.
18. Vervaeke K, Hu H, Graham LJ, Storm JF, (2006) Contrasting effects of the persistent Na+ current on neuronal excitability and spike timing. Neuron 49: 257-270.
19. Borg-Graham LJ, (2001) The computation of directional selectivity in the retina occurs presynaptic to the ganglion cell. Nat Neurosci 4: 176-183.
20. Katz Y, Menon V, Nicholson DA, Geinisman Y, Kath WL, et al. (2009) Synapse distribution suggests a two-stage model of dendritic integration in CA1 pyramidal neurons. Neuron 63: 171-177.
21. Watt AJ, Cuntz H, Mori M, Nusser Z, Sjostrom PJ, et al. (2009) Traveling waves in developing cerebellar cortex mediated by asymmetrical Purkinje cell connectivity. Nat Neurosci 12: 463-473.
22. Larkum ME, Nevian T, Sandler M, Polsky A, Schiller J, (2009) Synaptic integration in tuft dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons: a new unifying principle. Science 325: 756-760.
23. Hille B, (2001) Ion channels of excitable membranes Sunderland, Mass. Sinauerxviii, 814.
24. Shen GY, Chen WR, Midtgaard J, Shepherd GM, Hines ML, (1999) Computational analysis of action potential initiation in mitral cell soma and dendrites based on dual patch recordings. J Neurophysiol 82: 3006-3020.
25. Mainen ZF, Joerges J, Huguenard JR, Sejnowski TJ, (1995) A model of spike initiation in neocortical pyramidal neurons. Neuron 15: 1427-1439.
26. De Schutter E, Bower JM, (1994) An active membrane model of the cerebellar Purkinje cell. I. Simulation of current clamps in slice. J Neurophysiol 71: 375-400.
27. Druckmann S, Banitt Y, Gidon A, Schuermann F, Markram H, et al. (2007) A novel multiple objective optimization framework for constraining conductance-based neuron models by experimental data. Front Neurosci 1: 7-18.
28. Vapnik VN, (2000) The nature of statistical learning theory New York Springerxix, 314.
29. Prinz AA, Billimoria CP, Marder E, (2003) Alternative to hand-tuning conductance-based models: construction and analysis of databases of model neurons. J Neurophysiol 90: 3998-4015.
30. Gerstner W, Kistler WM, (2002) Spiking neuron models: single neurons, populations, plasticity Cambridge, U.K.; New York Cambridge University Pressxiv, 480.
31. Jolivet R, Rauch A, Luscher HR, Gerstner W, (2006) Predicting spike timing of neocortical pyramidal neurons by simple threshold models. J Comput Neurosci 21: 35-49.
32. Arsiero M, Luscher HR, Lundstrom BN, Giugliano M, (2007) The impact of input fluctuations on the frequency-current relationships of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the rat medial prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 27: 3274-3284.
33. Achard P, De Schutter E, (2006) Complex parameter landscape for a complex neuron model. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e94.
34. Keren N, Peled N, Korngreen A, (2005) Constraining compartmental models using multiple voltage recordings and genetic algorithms. J Neurophysiol 94: 3730-3742.
35. Van Geit W, De Schutter E, Achard P, (2008) Automated neuron model optimization techniques: a review. Biol Cybern 99: 241-251.
36. Vanier MC, Bower JM, (1999) A comparative survey of automated parameter-search methods for compartmental neural models. J Comput Neurosci 7: 149-171.
37. Keren N, Bar-Yehuda D, Korngreen A, (2009) Experimentally guided modelling of dendritic excitability in rat neocortical pyramidal neurones. J Physiol 587: 1413-1437.
38. Huys QJ, Ahrens MB, Paninski L, (2006) Efficient estimation of detailed single-neuron models. J Neurophysiol 96: 872-890.
39. Badel L, Lefort S, Berger TK, Petersen CC, Gerstner W, et al. (2008) Extracting non-linear integrate-and-fire models from experimental data using dynamic I-V curves. Biol Cybern 99: 361-370.
40. Lathi BP, (2005) Linear systems and signals New York Oxford University Pressxvi, 975.
41. Kondgen H, Geisler C, Fusi S, Wang XJ, Luscher HR, et al. (2008) The dynamical response properties of neocortical neurons to temporally modulated noisy inputs in vitro. Cereb Cortex 18: 2086-2097.
42. Lundstrom BN, Higgs MH, Spain WJ, Fairhall AL, (2008) Fractional differentiation by neocortical pyramidal neurons. Nat Neurosci 11: 1335-1342.
43. Jolivet R, Schurmann F, Berger TK, Naud R, Gerstner W, et al. (2008) The quantitative single-neuron modeling competition. Biol Cybern 99: 417-426.
44. Ma Y, Hu H, Berrebi AS, Mathers PH, Agmon A, (2006) Distinct subtypes of somatostatin-containing neocortical interneurons revealed in transgenic mice. J Neurosci 26: 5069-5082.
45. Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ, (2001) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates San Diego, Calif. London Academicxxv, [264].
46. Paxinos G, Watson C, (1998) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates San Diego Academic Press [237] p.
47. Sherwood NM, Timiras PS, (1970) A stereotaxic atlas of the developing rat brain Berkeley University of California Press (p. 214-203 illus.) p.
48. Le Be JV, Silberberg G, Wang Y, Markram H, (2007) Morphological, electrophysiological, and synaptic properties of corticocallosal pyramidal cells in the neonatal rat neocortex. Cereb Cortex 17: 2204-2213.
49. Uhlenbeck G, Ornstein L, (1930) On the theory of the brownian motion. Physical Review 36: 823-841.
50. Badel L, Lefort S, Brette R, Petersen CC, Gerstner W, et al. (2008) Dynamic I-V curves are reliable predictors of naturalistic pyramidal-neuron voltage traces. J Neurophysiol 99: 656-666.
51. Carnevale NT, Hines ML, (2005) The NEURON book Cambridge, New York Cambridge University Pressxix, 457.
52. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T, (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Ieee Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6: 182-197.
53. Cohon JL, (1985) Multicriteria programming: Brief review and application. In: Gero JS, editors. Design Optimization New York Academic Press.