Agreement to detect glaucomatous visual field progression by using three different methods: A multicentre study

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 95, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1276-1283

  Iester, Michele ^a   Capris, E ^a   De Feo, F ^b   Polvicino, M ^b   Brusini, P ^c   Capris, P ^d   Corallo, G ^a   Figus, M ^e   Fogagnolo, P ^f   Frezzotti, P ^g   Manni, G ^h   Perdicchi, A ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^b IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini   (Italy)

^c SANTA MARIA DELLA MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d G GASLINI INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^f IRCCS FONDAZIONE BIETTI   (Italy)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

ⁱ SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GUIDED PROGRESSION ANALYSIS; GUIDED PROGRESSION ANALYSIS 2; HUMAN; HUMPHREY OVERVIEW PRINTOUT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

AGED; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 80052120920     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2010.189456     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, et al. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: The early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:48-56. (Pubitemid 36401765)
2. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS), 7: The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:429-40.
3. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268-79. (Pubitemid 36105431)
4. Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:1419-28. (Pubitemid 26177317)
5. Chauhan BC, Drance SM, Douglas GR. The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:512-20. (Pubitemid 20117068)
6. Viswanathan AC, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: A comparison of PROGRESSOR and STATPAC 2. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:1037-42. (Pubitemid 27526819)
7. Chauhan BC, Drance SM, LeBlanc RP, et al. Technique for determining glaucomatous visual field progression by using animation graph. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;118:485-91. (Pubitemid 24307217)
8. Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Poinoososawmy D, et al. Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:40-8. (Pubitemid 26017558)
9. Flammer J, Drance SM, Zulauf M. Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls and patients with suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:704-6. (Pubitemid 14138703)
10. Boeglin RJ, Caprioli J, Zulauf M. Long-term fluctuation of visual field in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1992;113:396-400.
11. Katz J. Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Ophthalmology 1999;106;391-5. (Pubitemid 30191643)
12. Viswanathan AC, Crabb DP, McNaught AI, et al. Inter-observer agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison methods. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:726-30. (Pubitemid 36649225)
13. Werner EB, Bishop KI, Koelle J, et al. A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:619-23.
14. European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma 2008. 3rd ed. Savona: Dogma, 2008;(Ch 2):86-7.
15. Iester M, Swindale NV, Mikelberg FS. Sector-based analysis of optic Nerve head shape parameters and visual field indices in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma 1997;6:371-6. (Pubitemid 28051072)
16. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J, et al. Visual field interpretation with empiric probability maps. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:204-8. (Pubitemid 19055338)
17. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;45:343-53.
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 1977;33:363-74. (Pubitemid 8131514)
19. Grødum K, Heijl A, Bengtsson B. A comparison of glaucoma patients identified through mass screening and in routine clinical practice. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002;80:627-31. (Pubitemid 36024476)
20. Arnalich-Montiel F, Casas-Llera P, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, et al. Performance of glaucoma progression analysis software in a glaucoma population. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009;247:391-7.
21. Diaz-Aleman VT, Anton A, De la Rosa MG, et al. Detection of visual-field deterioration by Glaucoma Progression Analysis and Threshold Noiseless Trend programs. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:322-8.
22. Casas-Llera P, Rebolleda G, Munoz-Negrete FJ, et al. Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: comparison in a glaucoma population. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1576-9.
23. Perdicchi A, Iester M, Scuderi G, et al. Visual field damage and progression in glaucomatous myopic eyes. Eur J Ophthalmol 2007;17:534-7. (Pubitemid 47605760)
24. Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goñi FJ, et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:569-73. (Pubitemid 351497993)