Laypeople's preferences regarding frontal dentofacial esthetics: Periodontal factors

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 142, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 925-937

  Witt, Matthew ^a   Flores Mir, Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Buccal corridors; Gingival architecture; Gingival display; Laypeople; Midline deviation; Smile arc; Smile esthetics

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052103738     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0299     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Dipboye RL, Arvey RD, Terpstra DE. Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumg evaluations. J Appl Psychol 1976;62(3):288-294. (Pubitemid 8278127)
2. Klages U, Bruckner A, Zentner A. Dental aesthetics, self-awareness, and oral health-related quality of life in young adults. Eur J Orthod 2004;26(5):507-514. (Pubitemid 41296627)
3. Beall AE. Can a new smile make you look more intelligent and successful? Dent Clin North Am 2007;51(2):289-297, vii.
4. Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod 1999;21(5):517-522.
5. Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Public preferences for anterior tooth variations: a web-based study. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14(2):97-106. (Pubitemid 43020818)
6. Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Qian F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127(2):208-213. (Pubitemid 40327139)
7. Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod 2006;76(4):557-563. (Pubitemid 44066008)
8. Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(6):311-324.
9. Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130(2):141-151. (Pubitemid 44176322)
10. Martin AJ, Buschang PH, Boley JC, Taylor RW, McKinney TW. The impact of buccal corridorB on smile attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 2007;29(5):530-537.
11. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, Lagravere MO, Major PW. Lay person's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Orthod 2004;31(3):204-209; discussion 201.
12. Witt M, Flores-Mir C. Laypeople's preferences regarding frontal dentofacial esthetics: tooth-related factors. JADA 2011;142(6):635-645.
13. Ngom PI, Diagne F, Diop Ba K, Niang A, Normand F. Comparison of the perception of esthetic and orthodontic treatment need between an African and a Caucasian population (in French). Dakar Med 2006;51(1):10-16.
14. Cunliffe J, Pretty I. Patients' ranking of interdental "black triangles" against other common aesthetic problems. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2009;17(4):177-181.
15. Riakhovskil AN, Usanova EV. Peculiarities of visual perception of dentition and smile aesthetic parameters (in Russian). Stomatologiia (Mosk) 2007;86(6):56-59.
16. An KY, Lee JY, Kim SJ, Choi JI. Perception of maxillary anterior esthetics by dental professionals and laypeople and survey of gingival topography in healthy young subjects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29(5):535-541.
17. Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod 1998;4(3):146-152.
18. Carlsson GE, Wagner IV, Odman P, et al. An international comparative multicenter study of assessment of dental appearance using computer-aided image manipulation. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11(3):246-254. (Pubitemid 128505808)
19. Dunn WJ, Murchison DF, Broome JC. Esthetics: patients' perceptions of dental attractiveness. J Prosthodont 1996;5(3):166-171. (Pubitemid 126734281)
20. Geron S, Atalia W. Influence of sex on the perception of oral and smile esthetics with different gingival display and incisal plane inclination. Angle Orthod 2005;75(5):778-784. (Pubitemid 41297041)
21. Gracco A, Cozzani M, D'Elia L, Manfrini M, Peverada C, Siciliani G. The smile buccal corridors: aesthetic value for dentists and laypersons (in English, Italian). Prog Orthod 2006;7(1):56-65.
22. Gul-e-Erum, Fida M. Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople. World J Orthod 2008;9(2):132-140.
23. Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970;57(2):132-144.
24. Hunt O, Johnston C, Hepper P, Burden D, Stevenson M. The influence of maxillary gingival exposure on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod 2002;24(2):199-204.
25. Isiksal E, Hazar S, Akyalçin S. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129(1):8-16. (Pubitemid 43155742)
26. Jahanbin A, Pezeshkirad H. The effects of upper lip height on smile esthetics perception in normal occlusion and nonextraction, orthodontically treated females. Indian J Dent Res 2008;19(3):204-207.
27. Johnson DK, Smith RJ. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108(2):162-167.
28. Ker AJ, Chan R, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson's perspective: a computer-based survey study. JADA 2008;139(10):1318-1327.
29. Kerns LL, Silveira AM, Kerns DG, Regennitter FJ. Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile. J Esthet Dent 1997;9(2):76-85. (Pubitemid 127789561)
30. Kim E, Gianelly AA. Extraction vs nonextraction: arch widths and smile esthetics. Angle Orthod 2003;73(4):354-358. (Pubitemid 38968897)
31. Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133(4):515-523.
32. LaVacca MI, Tarnow DP, Cisneros GJ. Interdental papilla length and the perception of aesthetics. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005;17(6):405-412.
33. Mackley RJ. An evaluation of smiles before and after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1993;63(3):183-189; discussion 190.
34. McNamara L, McNamara JA Jr, Ackerman MB, Baccetti T. Hard-and soft-tissue contributions to the esthetics of the posed smile in growing patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133(4):491-499.
35. Parekh S, Fields HW, Beck FM, Rosenstiel SF. The acceptability of variations in smile arc and buccal corridor space. Orthod Craniofac Res 2007;10(1):15-21.
36. Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132(6):748-753.
37. Ritter DE, Gandini LG, Pinto Ados S, Locks A. Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling. Angle Orthod 2006;76(2):198-203. (Pubitemid 43326934)
38. Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127(3):343-350. (Pubitemid 40386460)
39. Rodrigues C de D, Magnani R, Machado MS, Oliveira OB Jr. The perception of smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod 2009;79(4):634-639.
40. Wagner IV, Carlsson GE, Ekstrand K, Odman P, Schneider N. A comparative study of assessment of dental appearance by dentists, dental technicians, and laymen using computer-aided image manipulation. J Esthet Dent 1996;8(5):199-205. (Pubitemid 126799150)