Public preferences for anterior tooth variations: A web-based study

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 97-106

  Rosenstiel, Stephen F ^a   Rashid, Robert G ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; CAUCASIAN; DENTAL CARE; DIASTEMA; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC OPINION; RACE; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOOTH; TOOTH DISCOLORATION; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; DENTAL CARE; DIASTEMA; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; ETHNIC GROUPS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC OPINION; SEX FACTORS; TOOTH; TOOTH DISCOLORATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036371263     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00158.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Berland L, Westbrook P. New techniques create a new smile. Dent Today 1998; 17:70-73.
2. Morley J. The role of cosmetic dentistry in restoring a youthful appearance. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130:1166-1172.
3. Kokich VO, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:311-324.
4. Carlsson GE, Wagner IV, Odman P, et al. An international comparative multicenter study of assessment of dental appearance using computer-aided image manipulation. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:246-254.
5. Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21:517-522.
6. Otuyemi OD, Ogunyinka A, Dosumu O, et al. Perceptions of dental aesthetics in the United States and Nigeria. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998; 26:418-420.
7. Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists' preferences of anterior tooth proportion: a Web-based study. J Prosthodont 2000; 9:123-136.
8. Preston JD. The golden proportion revisited. J Esthet Dent 1993; 5:247-251.
9. Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Visual assessment of occlusal caries: a Web-based dentists' survey. J Dent Res 2001; 80:229. (Abstr)
10. Buchanan T, Smith JL. Using the Internet for psychological research: personality testing on the World Wide Web. Br J Psychol 1999; 90:125-144.
11. Jones R, Pitt N. Health surveys in the workplace: comparison of postal, e-mail and World Wide Web methods. Occup Med 1999; 49:556-558.
12. Houston JD, Fiore DC. Online medical surveys: using the Internet as a research tool. MD Comput 1998; 15:116-120.
13. Wright S, Neill K. Using the World Wide Web for research data collection. Clin Excell Nurse Pract 1999; 3:362-365.
14. Alves DW, Szucs PA. The demographics of e-mail for emergency medicine research. Am J Emerg Med 2001; 19:192-195.
15. Conboy L, Domar A, O'Connell E. Women at mid-life: symptoms, attitudes, and choices, an Internet based survey. Maturitas 2001; 38:129-136.
16. Klapper JA, Klapper A, Voss T. The misdiagnosis of cluster headache: a nonclinic, population-based, Internet survey. Headache 2000; 40:730-735.
17. Torres R. Harmonious development and the Divine Proportion. Divulg Cult Odontol 1970; 162:3-13.
18. Levin EI. Dental esthetics and the Golden Proportion. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40:244-252.
19. Ricketts RM. The biologic significance of the Divine Proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 1982; 81:351-370.
20. Shoemaker WA. How to take the guess-work out of dental esthetics and function. Fla Dent J 1987; 58:35-39.