Laypeople's preferences regarding frontal dentofacial esthetics: Tooth-related factors

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 142, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 635-645

  Witt, Matthew ^a   Flores Mir, Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dentofacial esthetics; Laypeople; Smile; Tooth

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960089656     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0245     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod 1999;21(5):517-522.
2. Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Public preferences for anterior tooth variations: a Web-based study. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14(2):97-106. (Pubitemid 43020818)
3. Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Qian F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127(2):208-213. (Pubitemid 40327139)
4. Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod 2006;76(4):557-563. (Pubitemid 44066008)
5. Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(6):311-324.
6. Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130(2):141-151. (Pubitemid 44176322)
7. Martin AJ, Buschang PH, Boley JC, Taylor RW, McKinney TW. The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 2007;29(5):530-537.
8. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, Lagravere MO, Major PW. Lay person's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Orthod 2004;31(3):204-209; discussion 201.
9. Ngom PI, Diagne F, Diop Ba K, Niang A, Normand F. Comparison of the perception of esthetic and orthodontic treatment need between an African and a Caucasian population (in French). Dakar Med 2006;51(1):10-16.
10. Cunliffe J, Pretty I. Patients' ranking of interdental "black triangles" against other common aesthetic problems. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2009;17(4):177-181.
11. Riakhovski AN, Usanova EV. Peculiarities of visual perception of dentition and smile aesthetic parameters (in Russian). Stomatologiia (Mosk) 2007;86(6):56-59.
12. Anderson KM, Behrents RG, McKinney T, Buschang PH. Tooth shape preferences in an esthetic smile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128(4):458-465. (Pubitemid 41427092)
13. Brisman AS. Esthetics: a comparison of dentists' and patients' concepts. JADA 1980;100(3):345-352.
14. Carlsson GE, Wagner IV, Odman P, et al. An international comparative multicenter study of assessment of dental appearance using computer-aided image manipulation. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11(3):246-254. (Pubitemid 128505808)
15. Geron S, Alalia W. Influence of sex on the perception of oral and smile esthetics with different gingival display and incisal plane inclination. Angle Orthod 2005;75(5):778-784. (Pubitemid 41297041)
16. Gul-e-Erum, Fida M. Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople. World J Orthod 2008;9(2):132-140.
17. Ker AJ, Chan R, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson's perspective: a computer-based survey study. JADA 2008;139(10):1318-1327.
18. King KL, Evans CA, Viana G, BeGole E, Obrez A. Preferences for vertical position of the maxillary lateral incisors. World J Orthod 2008;9(2):147-154.
19. Ong E, Brown RA, Richmond S. Peer assessment of dental attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130(2):163-169. (Pubitemid 44202654)
20. Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132(6):748-753.
21. Rodrigues Cde D, Magnani R, Machado MS, Oliveira OB. The perception of smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod 2009;79(4):634-639.
22. Thomas JL, Hayes C, Zawaideh S. The effect of axial midline angulation on dental esthetics. Angle Orthod 2003;73(4):359-364. (Pubitemid 38968898)
23. Wagner IV, Carlsson GE, Ekstrand K, Odman P, Schneider N. A comparative study of assessment of dental appearance by dentists, dental technicians, and laymen using computer-aided image manipulation. J Esthet Dent 1996;8(5):199-205. (Pubitemid 126799150)
24. Wolfart S, Thormann H, Freitag S, Kern M. Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor proportions. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113(2):159-165. (Pubitemid 40592283)
25. Wolfart S, Brunzel S, Freitag S, Kern M. Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor angulation. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(2):150-154. (Pubitemid 38490975)
26. Gracco A, Cozzani M, D'Elia L, Manfrini M, Peverada C, Siciliani G. The smile buccal corridors: aesthetic value for dentists and laypersons (in English, Italian). Prog Orthod 2006;7(1):56-65.
27. Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127(3):343-350. (Pubitemid 40386460)
28. Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133(4):515-523.
29. Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970;57(2):132-144.