The perception of smile attractivenessvariations from esthetic norms, photographic framing and order of presentation

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 634-639

  De Deus Tupinambá Rodrigues, Caroline ^a   Magnani, Romeu ^a   Machado, Maria Salete Candido ^a   Oliveira Jr , Osmir Batista ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Esthetic; Perception; Smile

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; DIASTEMA; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; PILOT STUDY; STANDARD; VISION;

ADULT; DIASTEMA; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; PILOT PROJECTS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SMILING; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68149182747     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/030508-131.1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Quian F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetic. Am J Orthod Dentofa-cial Orthop. 2005;127:208-213.
2. Rufenacht CR. Fundamentals of Esthetics. 2nd ed. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing; 1990.
3. Vegter F, Hage J. Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106:1090-1096.
4. Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetic. Angle Orthod. 1970;40:284-318.
5. Philips C, Tulloch C, Dann C IV. Rating of facial attractiveness. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992;20:214-220.
6. Oumeish OY. The cultural and philosophical concepts of cosmetic in beauty and art through the medical history of mankind. Clin Dermatol. 2001;19:379-386.
7. Chew MT, Sansham A, Soh J, Wong BH. Outcome of or-thognathic surgery in Chinese patients. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77:845-850.
8. Kokich VO, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentist and lay people to altered dental esthetic. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11:311-324.
9. Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:141-151.
10. Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:116-127.
11. Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29:358-382.
12. Matthews TG. The anatomy of a smile. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39:128-134.
13. Wolfart S, Brunzel S, Freitag S, Kern M. Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor angulations. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:150-154.
14. Geron S, Atalia W. Influence of sex on the perception of oral and smile esthetics with different gingival and incisal plane inclination. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:778-784.
15. Kerosuo K, Al Enezi S, Kerosuo E, Abdulkarim E. Association between normative and self-perceived orthodontic treatment need among Arab high school students. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125:373-378.
16. Thomas JL, Hayes C, Zawaideh S. The effect of axial mid-line angulation on dental esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2003;3: 359-364.
17. Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod. 1998;4:395-411.
18. Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 120:98-111.
19. Valo TS, Ohio S. Anterior esthetics and visual arts: beauty, elements of composition, and their clinical application to dentistry. Curr Opin Cosmet Dent. 1995;3:24-32.
20. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, Lagravère MO, Major PW. Lay person's perception of smile in dental and face views. J Orthodont. 2004;31:204-209.
21. Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:517-522.
22. Kerns LL, Silveira AM, Kerns DG, Regenitter FJ. Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile. J Esthetic Dent. 1997;9:76-85.