Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 58, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1016-1024

  Kalavrouziotis, Dimitri ^a   Rodés Cabau, Josep ^a   Bagur, Rodrigo ^a   Doyle, Daniel ^a   De Larochellèire, Robert ^a   Pibarot, Philippe ^a   Dumont, Eric ^a  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

aortic annulus; aortic stenosis; prosthesispatient mismatch; transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; ARTICLE; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; MALE; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SMALL AORTIC ANNULUS; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 80052088476     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.026     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. S.H. Rahimtoola The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch Circulation 58 1978 20 24 (Pubitemid 8376654)
2. P. Pibarot, and J.G. Dumesnil Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention Heart 92 2006 1022 1029 (Pubitemid 44125207)
3. P. Pibarot, and J.G. Dumesnil Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management Circulation 119 2009 1034 1048
4. T. Walther, A. Rastan, and V. Falk Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30 2006 15 19 (Pubitemid 44183638)
5. S. Bleiziffer, W.B. Eichinger, and I. Hettich Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on exercise capacity in patients after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement Heart 94 2008 637 641 (Pubitemid 351580141)
6. F. Bakhtiary, M. Schiemann, and O. Dzemali Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch and aortic valve design on coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement J Am Coll Cardiol 49 2007 790 796 (Pubitemid 46240712)
7. G. Tasca, Z. Mhagna, and S. Perotti Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis Circulation 113 2006 570 576
8. J. Dhareshwar, T.M. Sundt, J.A. Dearani, H.V. Schaff, D.J. Cook, and T.A. Orszulak Aortic root enlargement: what are the operative risks? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134 2007 916 924 (Pubitemid 47445604)
9. M.D. Peterson, M.A. Borger, C.M. Feindel, and T.E. David Aortic annular enlargement during aortic valve replacement: improving results with time Ann Thorac Surg 83 2007 2044 2049 (Pubitemid 46805079)
10. A. Cribier, H. Eltchaninoff, and C. Tron Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve Mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience J Am Coll Cardiol 47 2006 1214 1223
11. J.G. Webb, S. Pasupati, and K. Humphries Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis Circulation 116 2007 755 763 (Pubitemid 47255993)
12. J. Rodés-Cabau, E. Dumont, and R. DeLarochellèire Feasibility and initial results of percutaneous aortic valve implantation including selection of the transfemoral or transapical approach in patients with severe aortic stenosis Am J Cardiol 102 2008 1240 1246
13. M.A. Clavel, J.G. Webb, and P. Pibarot Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis J Am Coll Cardiol 53 2009 1883 1891
14. J. Rodés-Cabau, J.G. Webb, and A. Cheung Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk: acute and late outcomes of the multicenter Canadian experience J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 1080 1090
15. D. Messika-Zeitoun, J.M. Serfaty, and E. Brochet Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 186 194
16. M.A. Clavel, J. Rodés-Cabau, and E. Dumont Method to measure the valve effective orifice area following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (abstr) Circulation 122 2010 A10394
17. J.G. Dumesnil, G.N. Honos, M. Lemieux, and J. Beauchemin Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography J Am Coll Cardiol 16 1990 637 643 (Pubitemid 20296128)
18. W.A. Zoghbi, J.B. Chambers, and J.G. Dumesnil Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22 2009 975 1014
19. R. Nicks, T. Cartmill, and L. Bernstein Hypoplasia of the aortic root The problem of aortic valve replacement Thorax 25 1970 339 346
20. S. Manouguian, and W. Seybold-Epting Patch enlargement of the aortic valve ring by extending the aortic incision into the anterior mitral leaflet New operative technique J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78 1979 402 412 (Pubitemid 10159629)
21. A. Kulik, M. Al-Saigh, and V. Chan Enlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: is there a benefit? Ann Thorac Surg 85 2008 94 100 (Pubitemid 350284578)
22. H. Okamura, A. Yamaguchi, K. Noguchi, K. Naito, K. Yuri, and H. Adachi Hemodynamics and outcomes of aortic valve replacement with a 17- or 19-mm valve Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 18 2010 450 455
23. M. Vicchio, A. Della Corte, and L.S. De Santo Prosthesis-patient mismatch in the elderly: survival, ventricular mass regression, and quality of life Ann Thorac Surg 86 2008 1791 1797
24. G. Cohen, B. Zagorski, and G.T. Christakis Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve with the Toronto Stentless Porcine Valve J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139 2010 848 859
25. P. Pibarot, J.G. Dumesnil, J. Jobin, P. Cartier, G. Honos, and L.G. Durand Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses J Am Coll Cardiol 34 1999 1609 1617 (Pubitemid 29528678)
26. I. Florath, A. Albert, U. Rosendahl, T. Alexander, I.C. Ennker, and J. Ennker Mid-term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves Heart 91 2005 1023 1029 (Pubitemid 41060007)
27. V. Chan, W.R.E. Jamieson, and E. Germann Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after aortic valve replacement J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131 2006 1267 1273 (Pubitemid 43776088)
28. R.O. Bonow, B.A. Carabello, and K. Chatterjee 2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) J Am Coll Cardiol 52 2008 e1 e142
29. P.S. Risteski, S. Martens, A. Rouhollahpour, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, A. Moritz, and M. Doss Prospective randomized evaluation of stentless vs. stented aortic biologic prosthetic valves in the elderly at five years Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 8 2009 449 453
30. S. Narang, D.K. Satsangi, A. Banerjee, and M.A. Geelani Stentless valves versus stented bioprostheses at the aortic position: midterm results J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136 2008 943 947
31. C.F. Sintek, A.D. Fletcher, and S. Khonsari Small aortic root in the elderly: use of stentless bioprosthesis J Heart Valve Dis 5 Suppl 3 1996 S308 S313
32. S. Lopez, P. Mathieu, and P. Pibarot Does the use of stentless aortic valves in a subcoronary position prevent patient-prosthesis mismatch for small aortic annulus? J Card Surg 23 2008 331 335 (Pubitemid 351852570)
33. D.S. Bach, P.C. Cartier, N.D. Kon, K.G. Johnson, G.M. Deeb, and D.B. Doty Impact of implant technique following freestyle stentless aortic valve replacement Ann Thorac Surg 74 2002 1107 1113 (Pubitemid 35176727)
34. M.B. Leon, C.R. Smith, and M. Mack Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery N Engl J Med 363 2010 1597 1607
35. H. Jilaihawi, D. Chin, and T. Spyt Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic-CoreValve bioprosthesis Eur Heart J 31 2010 857 864
36. D. Détaint, L. Lepage, and D. Himbert Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact of device and annulus discongruence J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2 2009 821 827
37. A. Colli, E.F. Nofrerias, and A. Escudero Aortic root rupture during trans-catheter aortic valve implantation Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 39 2011 788
38. M. Pasic, S. Buz, and S. Dreysse Transapical aortic valve implantation in 194 patients: problems, complications, and solutions Ann Thorac Surg 90 2010 1463 1469
39. L.F. Tops, D.A. Wood, and V. Delgado Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement J Am Coll Cardiol Img 1 2008 321 330 (Pubitemid 351681425)