Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 1609-1617

  Pibarot, Philippe ^a,b   Dumesnil, Jean G ^a   Jobin, Jean ^a   Cartier, Paul ^a,b,c   Honos, George ^c   Durand, Louis Gilles ^b  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CLIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY STENT; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENT;

BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; STENTS; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 0033231145     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00360-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Dumesnil J.G., LeBlanc M.H., Cartier P., et al. Hemodynamic features of the Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis as compared to stented bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 66:(Suppl S):1999;S130-S133.
2. Jin X.Y., Zhang Z.M., Gibson D.G., et al. Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 62:1996;683-690.
3. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Jobin J, et al. Usefulness of the indexed effective orifice area at rest in predicting an increase in gradient during maximal exercise in patients with a bioprosthesis in the aortic valve position [In press]. Am J Cardiol 1999;83.
4. Donatelli F., Triggiani M., Mariani M.A., et al. Rest and exercise hemodynamics of stentless porcine bioprostheses in aortic position. Cardiologia. 39:1994;41-47.
5. Eriksson M.J., Brodin L.A., Dellgren G.N., Radegran K. Rest and exercise hemodynamics of an extended stentless aortic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 6:1997;653-660.
6. Devereux R.B., Alonso D.R., Lutas E.M., et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy comparison to necropsy findings . Am J Cardiol. 57:1986;450-458.
7. Dumesnil J.G., Shoucri R.M., Laurenceau J.L., Turcot J. A mathematical model of the dynamic geometry of the intact left ventricle and its application to clinical data. Circulation. 59:1979;1024-1034.
8. Dumesnil J.G., Shoucri R.M. Effect of the geometry of the left ventricle on the calculation of ejection fraction. Circulation. 65:1982;91-98.
9. Grossman W., Jones D., McLaurin L.P. Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle. J Clin Invest. 56:1975;56-64.
10. Jones N.L., Makrides L., Hitchock C., McCartney N. Normal standard for an incremental progressive cycle ergometer test. Am Rev Respir Dis. 131:1985;700-708.
11. Nishijima H., Sato I., Matsumura N., et al. Ventilatory anaerobic threshold before and after cardiac valve surgery. Jpn Circ J. 57:1993;208-214.
12. Mahler D.A. American College of Sport Medicine Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 1995;Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
13. Dumesnil J.G., Honos G.N., Lemieux M., Beauchemin J. Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 16:1990;637-643.
14. Pibarot P., Honos G.N., Durand L.G., Dumesnil J.G. Substitution of left ventricular outflow tract diameter with prosthesis size is inadequate for calculation of the aortic prosthetic valve area by the continuity equation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 8:1995;511-517.
15. Rassi A., Crawford M.H., Richards K.L., Miller J.F. Differing mechanisms of exercise flow augmentation at the mitral and aortic valves. Circulation. 77:1988;543-551.
16. Shively B.K., Charlton G.A., Crawford M.H., Chaney R.K. Flow dependence of valve area in aortic stenosis relation to valve morphology . J Am Coll Cardiol. 31:1998;654-660.
17. Takeda S., Rimington H.M., Chambers J.B. The use of the pressure drop-flow slope as a measure of severity in patients with aortic stenosis (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol. 31:(Suppl A):1998;A246.
18. Burwash I.G., Pearlman A.S., Kraft C.D., et al. Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 24:1994;1342-1350.
19. Devereux R.B. Detection of left ventricular hypertrophy by M-mode echocardiography. Anatomic validation, standardization, and comparison to other methods. Hypertension. 9:(Suppl II):1987;II19-II26.
20. Jaffe W.M., Coverdale H.A., Roche A.H.G., et al. Rest and exercise hemodynamics of 20 to 23 mm allograft, Medtronic Intact (porcine), and St. Jude medical valves in the aortic position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 100:1990;167-174.
21. Van den Brink R.B.A., Verheul H.A., Visser C.A., et al. Value of exercise Doppler echocardiography in patients with prosthetic or bioprosthetic cardiac valves. Am J Cardiol. 69:1992;367-372.
22. Wiseth R., Levang O.W., Tangen G., et al. Exercise hemodynamics in small (≤21 mm) aortic valve prostheses assessed by Doppler echocardiography. Am Heart J. 125:1993;138-146.
23. Munt B.I., Legget M.E., Healy N.L., et al. Effects of aortic valve replacement on exercise duration and functional status in adults with valvular aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol. 13:1997;346-350.
24. Del Rizzo D.F., Goldman B.S., Joyner C.P., et al. Initial clinical experience with the Toronto stentless porcine valve. J Cardiac Surg. 9:1994;379-385.
25. Westaby S., Amarasena N., Long V., et al. Time-related hemodynamic changes after aortic replacement with the Freestyle stentless xenograft. Ann Thorac Surg. 60:1995;1633-1639.