Impact of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch and Aortic Valve Design on Coronary Flow Reserve After Aortic Valve Replacement

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 49, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 790-796

  Bakhtiary, Farhad ^a   Schiemann, Mirko ^a   Dzemali, Omer ^a   Dogan, Selami ^a   Schächinger, Volker ^a   Ackermann, Hans ^a   Moritz, Anton ^a   Kleine, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MORTALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZATION; SURVIVAL;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD PRESSURE; CORONARY CIRCULATION; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FITTING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33846929938     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.052     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kume T., Akasaka T., Kawamoto T., et al. Mechanisms of impaired coronary flow reserve in patients with aortic stenosis: transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic study. J Cardiol 43 (2004) 173-178
2. Britten M.B., Zeiher A.M., and Schachinger V. Microvascular dysfunction in angiographically normal or mildly diseased coronary arteries predicts adverse cardiovascular long-term outcome. Coron Artery Dis 15 (2004) 259-264
3. Emery R.W., Erickson C.A., Arom K.V., et al. Replacement of the aortic valve in patients under 50 years of age: long-term follow-up of the St. Jude Medical prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 75 (2003) 1815-1819
4. Dellgren G., Eriksson M.J., Brodin L.A., and Radegran K. Eleven years' experience with the Biocor stentless aortic bioprosthesis: clinical and hemodynamic follow-up with long-term relative survival rate. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22 (2002) 912-921
5. David T.E., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., Feindel C.M., and Cohen G. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121 (2001) 268-277
6. Dellgren G., David T.E., Raanani E., Armstrong S., Ivanov J., and Rakowski H. Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124 (2002) 146-154
7. Blackstone E.H., Cosgrove D.M., Jamieson W.R., et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126 (2003) 783-796
8. Blais C., Dumesnil J.G., Baillot R., Simard S., Doyle D., and Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108 (2003) 983-988
9. Kleine P., Klesius A.A., Scherer M., Abdel-Rahman U., and Moritz A. Initial in vivo results of the new Medtronic Advantage™ bileaflet valve in aortic position and comparison to the SJM. Cardiovasc Surg 10 (2002) 494
10. Kleine P., Abdel-Rahman U., Klesius A.A., Scherer M., and Moritz A. Comparison of hemodynamic performance of: Medtronic Hall 21 mm versus St. Jude Medical 23 mm prostheses in pigs. J Heart Valve Dis 11 (2002) 857-863
11. Kleine P., Scherer M., Abdel-Rahman U., Klesius A.A., and Moritz A. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124 (2002) 925-932
12. Scherer M., Abdel-Rahman U., Dzemali O., et al. Pathophysiology of coronary artery flow during extracorporeal circulation (ECC), myocardial ischemia and mechanical aortic valve replacement-an experimental study. Cardiology 1 (2005) 30-35
13. Stauder N.I., Stauder H., Fenchel M., et al. MR angiography and determination of the flow reserve after minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery of the left internal mammary artery in comparison to multirow CT. Rofo 177 (2005) 1094-1102
14. Schiemann M., Bakhtiary F., Hietschold V., et al. MR-based coronary artery blood velocity measurements in patients without coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 1124-1130
15. Dalla G.E., and Wilkinson L. An analytic approximation to the distribution of Lilliefors' test statistic for normality. Am Stat 40 (1986) 294-296
16. Kleine P., Perthel M., Nygaard H., et al. Medtronic Hall versus St. Jude Medical mechanical aortic valve: downstream turbulences with respect to rotation in swine. J Heart Valve Dis 7 (1998) 548-555
17. Seitelberger R., Bialy J., Gottardi R., et al. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25 (2004) 358-363
18. Mistiaen W.P., Van Cauwelaert P., Muylaert P., Wuyts F., and Bortier H. Risk factors for congestive heart failure after aortic valve replacement with a Carpentier-Edwards pericardial prosthesis in the elderly. J Heart Valve Dis 14 (2005) 774-779
19. Neglia D., Michelassi C., Trivieri M.G., et al. Prognostic role of myocardial blood flow impairment in idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 105 (2002) 186-193
20. Kleine P., Hasenkam J.M., Nygaard H., Perthel M., Wesemeyer D., and Laas J. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes-intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in human. J Heart Valve Dis 9 (2000) 308-312
21. Markl M., Draney M.T., Miller D.C., et al. Time-resolved 3-D magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healty volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130 (2005) 456-463
22. Lansac E., Lim H.S., Shomura Y., et al. A four dimensional study of the aortic root dynamics. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 22 (2002) 497-503
23. Ennker J., Rosendahl U., Albert A., Dumlu E., Ennker I.C., and Florath I. Stentless bioprostheses in small aortic roots: impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on survival and quality of life. J Heart Valve Dis 14 (2005) 523-530