Adult spiders use tougher silk: Ontogenetic changes in web architecture and silk biomechanics in the orb-weaver spider

Journal of Zoology

Volumn 285, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 28-38

  Sensenig, A T ^a   Agnarsson, I ^b   Blackledge, T A ^c  

^a Tabor College   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RIO PIEDRAS   (Puerto Rico)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthropod; Development; Foraging; Scaling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; BODY SIZE; EMERGENCE; FECUNDITY; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HOMOGENEITY; MAGNITUDE; ONTOGENY; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SPIDER; VOLUME;

ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; ARANEIDAE; ARTHROPODA; NEOSCONA;

EID: 80051926941     PISSN: 09528369     EISSN: 14697998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00809.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Agnarsson, I. & Blackledge, T.A. (2009). Can a spider web be too sticky? Tensile mechanics constrains the evolution of capture spiral stickiness in orb weaving spiders. J. Zool. (Lond.) 278, 134-140.
2. Agnarsson, I., Boutry, C. & Blackledge, T.A. (2008). Spider silk aging: initial improvement in a high performance material followed by slow degradation. J. Exp. Zool. 309A, 494-504.
3. Altig, R., Whiles, M.R. & Taylor, C.L. (2007). What do tadpoles really eat? Assessing the trophic status of an understudied and imperiled group of consumers in freshwater habitats. Freshw. Biol. 52, 386-395.
4. ap Rhisiart, A. & Vollrath, F. (1994). Design features of the orb web of the spider, Araneus diadematus. Behav. Ecol. 5, 280-287.
5. Blackledge, T.A. (2011). Prey capture in orb weaving spiders: are we using the best metric? J. Arachnol., 39, in press.
6. Blackledge, T.A., Cardullo, R.A. & Hayashi, C.Y. (2005). Polarized light microscopy, variability in spider silk diameters, and the mechanical characterization of spider silk. Invertebr. Biol. 124, 165-173.
7. Blackledge, T.A. & Eliason, C.M. (2007). Functionally independent components of prey capture are architecturally constrained in spider orb webs. Biol. Lett. 3, 456-458.
8. Blackledge, T.A. & Gillespie, R.G. (2002). Estimation of capture areas of spider webs in relation to web asymmetry. J. Arachnol. 30, 70-77.
9. Blackledge, T.A. & Hayashi, C.Y. (2006). Silken toolkits: biomechanics of silk fibers spun by the orb web spider Argiope argentata. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 2452-2461.
10. Blackledge, T.A., Swindeman, J.E. & Hayashi, C.Y. (2005). Quasistatic and continuous dynamic characterization of the mechanical properties of silk from the cobweb of the black widow spider Latrodectus hesperus. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 1937-1949.
11. Blackledge, T.A. & Zevenbergen, J.M. (2006). Mesh width influences prey retention in spider orb webs. Ethology 112, 1194-1201.
12. Boggs, C. & Freeman, K. (2005). Larval food limitation in butterflies: effects on adult resource allocation and fitness. Oecologia 144, 353-361.
13. Boutry, C. & Blackledge, T.A. (2008). The common house spider alters the material and mechanical properties of cobweb silk in response to different prey. J. Exp. Zool. 309A, 542-552.
14. Brandwood, A. (1985). Mechanical properties and factors of safety of spider drag-lines. J. Exp. Biol. 116, 141-151.
15. Comstock, J.H. (1940). The spider book. Ithaca: Comstock Publishers.
16. Craig, C.L. (1987). The significance of spider size to the diversification of spider-web architectures and spider reproductive modes. Am. Nat. 129, 47-68.
17. Denny, M. (1976). Physical properties of spider's silks and their role in design of orb-webs. J. Exp. Biol. 65, 483-506.
18. Diamond, J.M. (1984). Behavioral ecology - optimal foraging theory tested. Nature 311, 603-604.
19. Eberhard, W., Barrantes, G. & Madrigal-Brenes, R. (2008). Vestiges of an orb-weaving ancestor? The "biogenetic law" and ontogenetic changes in the webs and building behavior of the black widow spider Latrodectus geometricus (Araneae Theridiidae). Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 20, 211-244.
20. Eberhard, W.G. (1985). The "sawtoothed" orb web of Eustala sp. (Araneae, Araneidae) with a discussion of ontogenetic changes in spiders' web-building behavior. Psyche 92, 105-117.
21. Eberhard, W.G. (1986). Ontogenic changes in the web of Epeirotypus sp. (Araneae, Theridiosomatidae). J. Arachnol. 14, 125-128.
22. Eberhard, W.G. (1990a). Early stages of orb construction by Philoponella vicina, Leucauge mariana, and Nephila clavipes (Araneae, Uloboridae and Tetragnathidae), and their phylogenetic implications. J. Arachnol. 18, 205-234.
23. Eberhard, W.G. (1990b). Function and phylogeny of spider webs. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 341-372.
24. Edmunds, J. (1993). The development of the asymetrical web of Nephilengys cruentata (Fabricius). Mem. Queensl. Mus. 33, 503-506.
25. Garcia-Berthou, E. (2001). On the misuse of residuals in ecology: testing regression residuals vs. the analysis of covariance. J. Anim. Ecol. 70, 708-711.
26. Gosline, J.M., Guerette, P.A., Ortlepp, C.S. & Savage, K.N (1999). The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 3295-3303.
27. Gould, S.J. (1966). Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41, 587-638.
28. Griswold, C.E., Coddington, J.A., Hormiga, G. & Scharff, N. (1998). Phylogeny of the orb-web building spiders (Araneae, Orbiculariae: Deinopoidea, Araneoidea). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 123, 1-99.
29. Guinea, G.V., Pérez-Rigueiro, J., Plaza, G.R. & Elices, M. (2006). Volume constancy during stretching of spider silk. Biomacromolecules 7, 2173-2177.
30. Harmer, A.M.T., Blackledge, T.A., Madin, J.S. & Herberstein, M.E. (2011). High-performance spider webs: integrating biomechanics, ecology and behaviour. J. Roy. Soc. Inter. 8, 457-471.
31. Heiling, A.M. (2004). Effect of spider position on prey capture success and orb-web design. Acta Zool. Sin. 50, 554-565.
32. Heiling, A.M. & Herberstein, M.E. (1999). The role of experience in web-building spiders (Araneidae). Anim. Cogn. 2, 171-177.
33. Herberstein, M.E. & Heiling, A.M. (1998). Does mesh height influence prey length in orb-web spiders (Araneae)? Eur. J. Entomol. 95, 367-371.
34. Herberstein, M.E. & Heiling, A.M. (1999). Asymmetry in spider orb webs: a result of physical constraints? Anim. Behav. 58, 1241-1246.
35. Herberstein, M.E. & Tso, I.M. (2000). Evaluation of formulae to estimate the capture area and mesh height of orb webs (Araneoidea, Araneae). J. Arachnol. 28, 180-184.
36. Hesselberg, T. (2010). Ontogenetic changes in web design in two orb-web spiders. Ethology 116, 535-545.
37. Higgins, L. (1990). Variation in foraging investment during the intermolt interval and before egg-laying in the spider Nephila clavipes. J. Insect Behav. 3, 773-783.
38. Higgins, L.E. (1995). Direct evidence for trade-offs between foraging and growth in a juvenile spider. J. Arachnol. 23, 37-43.
39. Jakob, E.M., Marshall, S.D. & Uetz, G.W. (1996). Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices. Oikos 77, 61-67.
40. Japyassu, H.F. & Ades, C. (1998). From complete orb to semi-orb webs: Developmental transitions in the web of Nephilengys cruentata (Araneae Tetragnathidae). Behaviour 135, 931-956.
41. Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. (1997). Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Malden: Blackwell Science Ltd.
42. Krink, T. & Vollrath, F. (2000). Optimal area use in orb webs of the spider. Araneus diadematus. Naturwissenschaften 87, 90-93.
43. Kuntner, M. & Agnarsson, I. (2009). Phylogeny accurately predicts behaviour in Indian Ocean Clitaetra spiders (Araneae: Nephilidae). Invertebr. Syst. 23, 193-204.
44. Kuntner, M., Haddad, C.R., Aljancic, G. & Blejec, A. (2008). Ecology and web allometry of Clitaetra irenae, an arboricolous african orb-weaving spider (Araneae, Araneoidea, Nephilidae). J. Arachnol. 36, 583-594.
45. Kuntner, M., Kralj-Fišer, S. & Gregorič, M. (2010). Ladder webs in orb-web spiders: ontogenetic and evolutionary patterns in Nephilidae. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 99, 849-866.
46. Langer, R.M. & Eberhard, W. (1969). Laboratory photography of spider silk. Am. Zool. 9, 97-101.
47. Lohman, D.J. & Samarita, V.U. (2009). The biology of carnivorous butterfly larvae (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Miletinae: Miletini) and their ant-tended hemipteran prey in Thailand and the Philippines. J. Nat. Hist. 43, 569-581.
48. Masters, W.M. & Moffat, A.J.M. (1983). A functional explanation of top-bottom asymmetry in vertical orb webs. Anim. Behav. 31, 1043-1046.
49. Miyashita, T. (1997). Factors affecting the difference in foraging success in three co-existing Cyclosa spiders. J. Zool. 242, 137-149.
50. Nakata, K. (2010). Does ontogenetic change in orb web asymmetry reflect biogenetic law? Naturwissenschaften 97, 1029-1032.
51. Nakata, K. & Zschokke, S. (2010). Upside-down spiders build upside-down orb webs: web asymmetry, spider orientation and running speed in Cyclosa. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 277, 3019-3025.
52. Nentwig, W. (1985a). Prey analysis of four species of tropical orb-weaving spiders (Araneae, Araneidae) and a comparison with araneids of the temperate zone. Oecologia 66, 580-594.
53. Nentwig, W. (1985b). Top-bottom asymmetry in vertical orbwebs: a functional explanation and attendant complications. Oecologia 67, 111-112.
54. Opell, B.D. (1996). Functional similarities of spider webs with diverse architectures. Am. Nat. 148, 630-648.
55. Opell, B.D. & Bond, J.E. (2001). Changes in the mechanical properties of capture threads and the evolution of modern orb-weaving spiders. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 567-581.
56. Opell, B.D. & Hendricks, M.L. (2007). Adhesive recruitment by the viscous capture threads of araneoid orb-weaving spiders. J. Exp. Biol. 210, 553-560.
57. Opell, B.D., Markley, B.J., Hannum, C.D. & Hendricks, M.L. (2008). The contribution of axial fiber extensibility to the adhesion of viscous capture threads spun by orb-weaving spiders. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 2243-2251.
58. Opell, B.D. & Schwend, H.S. (2007). The effect of insect surface features on the adhesion of viscous capture threads spun by orb-weaving spiders. J. Exp. Biol. 210, 2352-2360.
59. Ortlepp, C. & Gosline, J.M. (2008). The scaling of safety factor in spider draglines. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 2832-2840.
60. Osaki, S. (1999). Is the mechanical strength of spider's drag-lines reasonable as lifeline? Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 24, 283-287.
61. Prenter, J., Elwood, R.W. & Montgomery, W.I. (1999). Sexual size dimorphism and reproductive investment by female spiders: a comparative analysis. Evolution 53, 1987-1994.
62. Sandoval, C.P. (1994). Plasticity in web design in the spider Parawixia bistriata- a response to variable prey type. Funct. Ecol. 8, 701-707.
63. Sensenig, A., Agnarsson, I. & Blackledge, T.A. (2010). Behavioural and biomaterial coevolution in spider orb webs. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 1839-1856.
64. Sherman, P.M. (1994). The orb web - an energetic and behavioral estimator of a spiders dynamic foraging and reproductive strategies. Anim. Behav. 48, 19-34.
65. StatSoft Inc. (2009). STATISTICA (data analysis software system). Tulsa: StatSoft Inc.
66. Swanson, B.O., Blackledge, T.A. & Hayashi, C.Y. (2007). Spider capture silk: performance implications of variation in an exceptional biomaterial. J. Exp. Zool. A: Ecol. Gen. Phys. 307A, 654-666.
67. Venner, S. & Casas, J. (2005). Spider webs designed for rare but life-saving catches. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 272, 1587-1592.
68. Vollrath, F. & Köhler, T. (1996). Mechanics of silk produced by loaded spiders. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 263, 387-391.
69. Vollrath, F., Madsen, B. & Shao, Z.Z. (2001). The effect of spinning conditions on the mechanics of a spider's dragline silk. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 268, 2339-2346.
70. Warton, D.I., Wright, I.J., Falster, D.S. & Westoby, M. (2006). Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol. Rev. 81, 259-291.
71. Witt, P.N., Rawlings, J.O. & Reed, C.F. (1972). Ontogeny of web-building behavior in two orb-weaving spiders. Am. Zool. 12, 445-454.
72. Zschokke, S. & Herberstein, M.E. (2005). Laboratory methods for maintaining and studying web-building spiders. J. Arachnol. 33, 205-213.
73. Zschokke, S. & Nakata, K. (2010). Spider orientation and hub position in orb webs. Naturwissenschaften 97, 43-52.