Behavioural and biomaterial coevolution in spider orb webs

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1839-1856

  Sensenig, A ^a   Agnarsson, I ^a,b   Blackledge, T A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RIO PIEDRAS   (Puerto Rico)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Functional morphology; Silk; Tensile properties; Web

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL;

BIOENERGETICS; BIOMECHANICS; BIRD; BODY SIZE; COEVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FECUNDITY; FLY; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; PREY CAPTURE; PROTEIN; SELECTION; SPIDER; SPIDER WEB; STEREOTYPIC BEHAVIOR; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SILK; SPIDER;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SILK; SPIDERS;

ARANEAE; AVES; CHIRONOMIDAE; HEXAPODA; MOLLUSCA;

EID: 77955933637     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02048.x     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Ackerly DD, Donoghue MJ. Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner's rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (Acer). Am. Nat. 1998, 152:767-791.
2. Agnarsson I, Blackledge TA. Can a spider web be too sticky? Tensile mechanics constrains the evolution of capture spiral stickiness in orb weaving spiders. J. Zool. (Lond.) 2009, 278:134-140.
3. Alexander RM. Elastic energy stores in running vertebrates. Am. Zool. 1984, 24:85-94.
4. Anderson JF, Rahn H, Prange HD. Scaling of supportive tissue mass. Q. Rev. Biol. 1979, 54:139-148.
5. Arnold SJ. Morphology, performance, and fitness. Am. Zool. 1983, 23:347-361.
6. Bell E, Gosline J. Mechanical design of mussel byssus: material yield enhances attachment strength. J. Exp. Biol. 1996, 199:1005-1017.
7. Bell EC, Gosline JM. Strategies for life in flow: tenacity, morphometry, and probability of dislodgment of two Mytilus species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1997, 159:197-208.
8. Bennett AF, Huey RB. Studying the evolution of physiological performance. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 1990, 7:251-284.
9. Bertram JEA, Gosline JM. Functional design of horse hoof keratin: the modulation of mechanical properties through hydration effects. J. Exp. Biol. 1987, 130:121-136.
10. Blackledge TA, Eliason CM. Functionally independent components of prey capture are architecturally constrained in spider orb webs. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3:456-458.
11. Blackledge TA, Gillespie RG. Estimation of capture areas of spider webs in relation to web asymmetry. J. Arachnol. 2002, 30:70-77.
12. Blackledge TA, Gillespie RG. Convergent evolution of behavior in an adaptive radiation of Hawaiian web-building spiders. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:16228-16233.
13. Blackledge TA, Hayashi CY. Silken toolkits: biomechanics of silk fibers spun by the orb web spider Argiope argentata. J. Exp. Biol. 2006, 209:2452-2461.
14. Blackledge TA, Zevenbergen JM. Mesh width influences prey retention in spider orb webs. Ethology 2006, 112:1194-1201.
15. Blackledge TA, Binford GJ, Gillespie RG. Resource use within a community of Hawaiian spiders (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2003, 40:293-303.
16. Blackledge TA, Cardullo RA, Hayashi CY. Polarized light microscopy, variability in spider silk diameters, and the mechanical characterization of spider silk. Invertebr. Biol. 2005a, 124:165-173.
17. Blackledge TA, Swindeman JE, Hayashi CY. Quasistatic and continuous dynamic characterization of the mechanical properties of silk from the cobweb of the black widow spider Latrodectus hesperus. J. Exp. Biol. 2005b, 208:1937-1949.
18. Blackledge TA, Coddington JA, Agnarsson I. Fecundity increase supports adaptive radiation hypothesis in spider web evolution. Commun. Integr. Biol 2009a, 2:459-463.
19. Blackledge TA, Scharff N, Coddington JA, Szuts T, Wenzel JW, Hayashi CY, Agnarsson I. Reconstructing web evolution and spider diversification in the molecular era. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2009b, 106:5229-5234.
20. Bonser R, Purslow P. The Young's modulus of feather keratin. J. Exp. Biol. 1995, 198:1029-1033.
21. Boutry C, Blackledge TA. The common house spider alters the material and mechanical properties of cobweb silk in response to different prey. J. Exp. Zool. 2008, 309A:542-552.
22. Brazee SL, Carrington E. Interspecific comparison of the mechanical properties of mussel byssus. Biol. Bull. 2006, 211:263-274.
23. Cameron GJ, Wess TJ, Bonser RHC. Young's modulus varies with differential orientation of keratin in feathers. J. Struct. Biol. 2003, 143:118-123.
24. Carrano MT. Locomotion in non-avian dinosaurs: integrating data from hindlimb kinematics, in vivo strains, and bone morphology. Paleobiology 1998, 24:450-469.
25. Comstock JH. The Spider Book 1940, Comstock Publishers, Ithaca
26. Craig CL. Orb-web visibility - the influence of insect flight behavior and visual physiology on the evolution of web designs within the Araneoidea. Anim. Behav. 1986, 34:54-68.
27. Craig CL. The significance of spider size to the diversification of spider-web architectures and spider reproductive modes. Am. Nat. 1987, 129:47-68.
28. Eberhard WG. Effects of orb-web geometry on prey interception and retention. Spiders, Webs, Behavior and Evolution 1986a, 70-100. Shear WA. ed, Stanford University Press, Stanford
29. Eberhard WG. Ontogenic changes in the web of Epeirotypus sp. (Araneae, Theridiosomatidae). J. Arachnol. 1986b, 14:125-128.
30. Eberhard WG. Behavioral flexibility in orb web construction - effects of supplies in different silk glands and spider size and weight. J. Arachnol. 1988, 16:295-302.
31. Eberhard WG. Effects of orb-web orientation and spider size on prey retention. Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc. 1989, 8:45-48.
32. Eberhard WG. Function and phylogeny of spider webs. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1990, 21:341-372.
33. Emmanuel De M, Sophie S, Jorge C, Jacques C. Torsional resistance as a principal component of the structural design of long bones: comparative multivariate evidence in birds. Anat. Rec. A Discov. Mol. Cell. Evol. Biol 2005, 282A:49-66.
34. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 1985, 125:1-15.
35. Galilei G. Discourses and mathematical demonstrations concerning two new sciences. Two New Sciences 1638, 169-170. Drake S. ed, University of Wisconsin Press Ltd., Madison
36. Garland T, Ives AR. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 2000, 155:346-364.
37. Garland TJ, Losos JB. Ecological morphology of locomotor performance in reptiles. Ecological Morphology: Integrative Organismal Biology 1994, 240-302. Wainwright P, Reilly S. eds, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
38. Garland T, Harvey PH, Ives AR. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 1992, 41:18-32.
39. Garland T, Midford PE, Ives AR. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral states. Am. Zool. 1999, 39:374-388.
40. Goloboff P, Ferris J, Nixon K. T.N.T.: tree analysis using new technology. 2003, http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny/TNT, Program and documentation available from the authors and at
41. Gosline JM, Guerette PA, Ortlepp CS, Savage KN. The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. J. Exp. Biol. 1999, 202:3295-3303.
42. Griswold CE, Coddington JA, Hormiga G, Scharff N. Phylogeny of the orb-web building spiders (Araneae, Orbiculariae Deinopoidea, Araneoidea). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1998, 123:1-99.
43. Guinea GV, Pérez-Rigueiro J, Plaza GR, Elices M. Volume constancy during stretching of spider silk. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7:2173-2177.
44. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41:95-98.
45. Herberstein ME, Heiling AM. Does mesh height influence prey length in orb-web spiders (Araneae)? Eur. J. Entomol. 1998, 95:367-371.
46. Herberstein ME, Tso IM. Evaluation of formulae to estimate the capture area and mesh height of orb webs (Araneoidea, Araneae). J. Arachnol. 2000, 28:180-184.
47. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist R. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinfomatics 2001, 17:754-755.
48. Japyassu HF, Ades C. From complete orb to semi-orb webs: developmental transitions in the web of Nephilengys cruentata (Araneae Tetragnathidae). Behaviour 1998, 135:931-956.
49. Krink T, Vollrath F. Optimal area use in orb webs of the spider Araneus diadematus. Naturwissenschaften 2000, 87:90-93.
50. Kuntner M, Agnarsson I. Phylogeny accurately predicts behaviour in Indian Ocean Clitaetra spiders (Araneae: Nephilidae). Invertebr. Syst. 2009, 23:193-204.
51. Langer RM, Eberhard W. Laboratory photography of spider silk. Am. Zool. 1969, 9:97-101.
52. Lin LH, Edmonds DT, Vollrath F. Structural engineering of an orb-spider's web. Nature (London) 1995, 373:146-148.
53. Losos JB. Ecomorphology, performance capability, and scaling of West-Indian Anolis lizards - an evolutionary analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 1990a, 60:369-388.
54. Losos JB. The evolution of form and function: morphology and locomotor performance ability in West Indian Anolis lizards. Evolution 1990b, 44:1189-1203.
55. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. 2008, http://mesquiteproject.org, pp
56. Madrell S. Bone design and biomechanics. Principles of Animal Design: The Optimization and Symmorphosis Debate 1998, 63-86. Ewald CRTWeibel RBolis L. eds), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
57. Midford PE, Garland TJ, Maddison WP. PDAP Package of Mesquite. 2005, pp
58. Opell BD. Estimating the stickiness of individual adhesive capture threads in spider orb webs. J. Arachnol. 2002, 30:494-502.
59. Opell BD, Bond JE. Changes in the mechanical properties of capture threads and the evolution of modern orb-weaving spiders. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2001, 3:567-581.
60. Opell BD, Hendricks ML. Adhesive recruitment by the viscous capture threads of araneoid orb-weaving spiders. J. Exp. Biol. 2007, 210:553-560.
61. Opell BD, Schwend HS. The effect of insect surface features on the adhesion of viscous capture threads spun by orb-weaving spiders. J. Exp. Biol. 2007, 210:2352-2360.
62. Opell BD, Lipkey GK, Hendricks ML, Vito ST. Daily and seasonal changes in the stickiness of viscous capture threads in Argiope aurantia and Argiope trifasciata orb-webs. J. Exp. Zool. A Ecol. Genet. Physiol. 2009, 311A:217-225.
63. Ortlepp C, Gosline JM. The scaling of safety factor in spider draglines. J. Exp. Biol. 2008, 211:2832-2840.
64. Osaki S. Is the mechanical strength of spider's drag-lines reasonable as lifeline? Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1999, 24:283-287.
65. Pollock CM, Shadwick RE. Relationship between body mass and biomechanical properties of limb tendons in adult mammals. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 1994, 266:R1016-R1021.
66. Posada D, Crandall KA. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinfomatics 1998, 14:817-818.
67. Prenter J, Elwood RW, Montgomery WI. Sexual size dimorphism and reproductive investment by female spiders: a comparative analysis. Evolution 1999, 53:1987-1994.
68. Revell LJ. Size-correction and principle components for interspecific comparative studies. Evolution 2009, 63:3258-3268.
69. Sandoval CP. Plasticity in web design in the spider Parawixia bistriata- a response to variable prey type. Funct. Ecol 1994, 8:701-707.
70. Sherman PM. The orb web - an energetic and behavioral estimator of a spiders dynamic foraging and reproductive strategies. Anim. Behav. 1994, 48:19-34.
71. Summers AP, Koob TJ. The evolution of tendon -- morphology and material properties. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2002, 133:1159-1170.
72. Swanson BO, Blackledge TA, Hayashi CY. Spider capture silk: performance implications of variation in an exceptional biomaterial. J. Exp. Zool. A Ecol. Genet. Physiol. 2007, 307A:654-666.
73. Swartz SM, Bennett MB, Carrier DR. Wing bone stresses in free flying bats and the evolution of skeletal design for flight. Nature 1992, 359:726-729.
74. Tritton DJ. Physical Fluid Dynamics 1988, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
75. Venner S, Casas J. Spider webs designed for rare but life-saving catches. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 272:1587-1592.
76. Vogel S. Comparative Biomechanics: Life's Physical World 2003, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
77. Vollrath F, Madsen B, Shao ZZ. The effect of spinning conditions on the mechanics of a spider's dragline silk. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2001, 268:2339-2346.
78. Wheeler TJ, Kececioglu JD. Multiple alignment by aligning alignments. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:559-568.
79. Wirth E, Barth FG. Forces in the spider orb web. J. Comp. Physiol. A 1992, 171:359-371.
80. Zschokke S, Herberstein ME. Laboratory methods for maintaining and studying web-building spiders. J. Arachnol. 2005, 33:205-213.
81. Zwickl DJ. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. School of Biological Sciences 2006, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin